Camunda and WorkFusion compete in the business process management and automation sectors. Camunda appears to have the upper hand due to its open-source model and broad standard support, allowing extensive customization and process management.
Features: Camunda is notable for its flexibility, offering BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards, and strong REST API integration for service architectures. It is open-source, which allows for customization and modification. Non-programmers can use it for process modeling with drag-and-drop capabilities and its microservices and automated workflows support. WorkFusion is strong in RPA and machine learning, offering document processing and prebuilt automation components. It has robust cognitive feature integration, making it apt for handling large datasets suitable for large-scale automation.
Room for Improvement: Camunda's UI customization is challenging, and improvements are needed in the forms designer and process visualization tools. Better integration with external systems and support for more programming frameworks would enhance usability. WorkFusion needs a more user-friendly interface and better documentation. Improvements in AI-driven automation and OCR functionalities would benefit WorkFusion, as would easier integration processes and execution.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda offers On-premises, Private Cloud, and Hybrid Cloud deployments, catering to various needs, yet community support could be more accessible. Paid support is considered effective. WorkFusion provides On-premises and Hybrid Cloud options, with public cloud offerings favored by large enterprises. While adequate, its customer service could improve in responsiveness and technical guidance.
Pricing and ROI: Camunda's open-source nature means lower upfront costs, though enterprise versions can become expensive as they scale. The initial flexible pricing is attractive, but costs can increase with volume. WorkFusion, despite higher initial costs, offers value through service bundles that are appealing to larger enterprises, yet can be prohibitive for smaller businesses. Both solutions demonstrate potential for ROI through efficiencies in automation, necessitating thoughtful cost planning.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
They respond quickly, collect necessary logs, and sometimes propose new solutions.
Some issues are resolved quickly, while others might take time as they require further analysis.
Initial support often struggles to find solutions, leading to delays until more experienced personnel get involved.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
It allows for easy scaling, especially with ECS service configurations.
WorkFusion is efficient for structured automation tasks with predefined templates and clear documentation.
The number of bots currently running on the platform should be more than 1,000, including RPA and non-RPA bots.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
I frequently face issues with infrastructure and some WorkFusion-related problems, such as login issues.
WorkFusion requires a strong background in Java to meet requirements effectively.
Some stability problems may arise from processes that have not been designed or coded properly, leading to glitches.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
In low-code automation, most parts are not customizable, particularly when Excel is involved, which increases complexity.
WorkFusion requires a high level of Java knowledge for programming, making it quite technical.
For some services, such as hosting databases, Google is really expensive.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
Currently, I would rate their pricing around two, as WorkFusion's cloud version seems costly compared to others.
I am not familiar with the exact pricing, however, it is considered pricey.
It is worth the money as a tool.
EC2 makes scaling horizontally incredibly easy, especially when working under the ECS service.
It also supports reusable code components through Java, making it efficient for developers.
They provide an inbuilt Selenium framework and infrastructure that eases my workload, allowing me to write Java code and embed it within Groovy classes.
The platform now includes auto machine learning and AI capabilities.
Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.
WorkFusion, Inc. is the creator of AI-enabled Digital Workers designed specifically for banking and financial services organizations. Its Digital Workers are true knowledge workers that effectively augment existing teams in functions like anti-money laundering (AML), sanctions, customer onboarding, Know Your Customer (KYC), and customer service. WorkFusion’s digital workforce solutions help solve talent shortages, increase workforce capacity, save money, enhance employee and customer satisfaction, and ensure ongoing compliance. For more information visit workfusion.com.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
