Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Camunda vs Control-M comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Camunda improves ROI by reducing costs, enhancing efficiency, saving time, and offering robust BPMN and DMN integration tools.
Sentiment score
7.4
Control-M boosts efficiency and reduces costs with enhanced productivity, centralized job management, and improved data handling for enterprises.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Camunda's support is helpful but inconsistent, with enterprise users benefiting more, while smaller businesses face pricing and support challenges.
Sentiment score
7.4
Control-M support is praised for responsiveness and expertise, despite occasional response delays and challenges with ticketing and documentation.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
They do not always provide timely support.
Solutions are available on the web.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Camunda offers scalability with technologies like Spring Boot and Docker, though database dependencies and auto-scaling improvements remain challenges.
Sentiment score
7.7
Control-M offers excellent scalability and adaptability, efficiently handling significant workloads across diverse IT environments for enterprise growth.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
As the workload on Control-M increases, its scalability is much higher.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Camunda is highly stable and reliable, often scoring 7-10 in stability, with minor issues in integrations and configurations.
Sentiment score
7.7
Control-M is praised for its stability, reliability, and improved performance, crucial for handling complex, high-volume operations efficiently.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
 

Room For Improvement

Camunda users seek better navigation, customization, integrations, documentation, security, language support, performance, visualization, and support services improvements.
Control-M needs enhanced reporting, flexibility, automation, integration, reduced costs, and a user-friendly web-based interface for improved usability.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
There should be an automation system for developers to set it up more easily and quickly.
The UI can be challenging for new users due to its learning curve.
 

Setup Cost

Camunda's enterprise version is costly, prompting many to choose the free edition or seek alternatives for advanced features.
Control-M pricing is costly for small enterprises but seen as valuable by larger ones due to its features.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more.
 

Valuable Features

Camunda offers lightweight, flexible BPMN 2.0 compliance, open-source access, microservices orchestration, and user-friendly tools for process automation.
Control-M excels in user-friendly automation, integration, and scheduling, enhancing workflow efficiency and reliability across diverse applications.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
It is integrated into our CI/CD pipeline.
 

Categories and Ranking

Camunda
Ranking in Process Automation
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (2nd), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st)
Control-M
Ranking in Process Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
118
Ranking in other categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT) (4th), Workload Automation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Camunda is 29.1%, up from 27.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Control-M is 4.2%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Peter Broucke - PeerSpot reviewer
Support is good (even the basic one), documentation is readily available and matches the need for agile development
Probably one area I look forward to has to do with AI and how Camunda sees the AI angle on workflow. I know they're working on that or at least communicating about it. They already have versions to run on the cloud, so they've tackled that. We're looking at what they will come up with otherwise. As long as the product gets enough traction and evolves, we're happy. With open source, you can monitor what's happening. If the product is being left by many customers, that's a sign. We're also users of Camunda, and you can watch one of our guides' presentations in the States about one of our implementations. Our focus now is on developing service management and DMN APIs for the platform. AI is something we take into consideration, but we'll see what additional benefits it could bring and how to interconnect it with our data or AI engineering.
Pedro Fuentes - PeerSpot reviewer
Cost-effective, excellent support, and centralized access and control
They have a department that handles requests for enhancements. I talked to Control-M guys back in October or November when they had a gathering here in Atlanta. We talked about not being able to go back in history in Helix Control-M for more than two weeks. We submitted a request for enhancement. They told us that they are working on it, and they are thinking of expanding that to 30 days. We would like to see it expand to 90 days, but they are working on it. In Control-M, we were able to go back 180 days, but that was on-prem. The storage of that data was on our own servers. We know that storage is money, and we do not expect them to store that much of the data, but at least 30 to 60 days seem proper.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...
What do you like most about Control-M?
First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Camunda BPM
Control M
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. Control-M and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.