Control-M and Camunda operate within the workflow automation category. While Control-M is suitable for larger enterprises due to its robust integration capabilities and comprehensive support, Camunda seems to have an edge in flexibility and cost-effectiveness for developers.
Features: Control-M provides extensive integration capabilities, making it apt for banking environments where secure processing is essential. Its ability to manage workflows across different platforms with ease is highly valued, alongside robust processing that adds to its appeal. Camunda is recognized for its developer-friendly approach with outstanding open-source features. It adheres to BPMN standards and offers flexibility in modeling processes, which is seen as a huge plus. Additionally, it supports a variety of programming languages and microservices.
Room for Improvement: Control-M can enhance its reporting functionalities and improve integration for dynamic job types. Additionally, adjustments in cost customization and license management could provide more flexibility to users. Camunda, while cost-effective, could work on improving user interface options for low-code development to better meet the needs of complex enterprise environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M is praised for its deployment flexibility in both cloud and on-premises environments, along with reputable customer support, although there is a call for enhanced holistic system support. Camunda's open-source availability and strong community support make it versatile, yet timely enterprise support could be improved for quicker resolutions.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M is often perceived as costly, fit for larger enterprises due to its extensive capabilities that justify the price through operational efficiency and increased ROI. On the other hand, Camunda offers an open-source model and is noted for its cost-effectiveness even in paid versions, providing scalable features at a competitive price.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
It has reduced the total cost of ownership by 30% to 40%.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
If something fails at 3 AM in the morning, you need to fix it and get it back up and working really quickly.
They do not always provide timely support.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
ECS and Fargate make horizontal scalability very easy.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
As the workload on Control-M increases, its scalability is much higher.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The stability of the Helix Control-M solution is good.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
There should be an automation system for developers to set it up more easily and quickly.
What they've done about scheduling, other people are still trying to figure out.
AWS pricing is very competitive compared to Azure and cheap compared to Google.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more.
The best cell phone will always be more expensive.
The pricing is moderate, not too low or too high compared to other solutions.
EC2 makes scaling horizontally incredibly easy, especially when working under the ECS service.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
Control-M provides workflow orchestration, including scheduling, deploying, managing, and monitoring workflows.
Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.
Control-M is used for enterprise workload automation, orchestrating finance, retail, healthcare, and supply chain processes. It handles batch job scheduling, managed file transfers, cloud integrations, and compliance auditing across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
Organizations leverage Control-M to efficiently monitor and manage business-critical processes like payroll, HR, SAP, Informatica, and database tasks. It enhances visibility, security, and error resolution. Automating and optimizing workflows in data centers, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, Control-M supports diverse technological environments. The platform's robust capabilities make it suitable for effective centralized management of applications and data pipelines, ensuring enhanced collaboration and scalability.
What are Control-M's most important features?Control-M is implemented in industries like finance to handle payroll and HR tasks, in retail for inventory management and supply chain processes, and in healthcare for compliance auditing and patient data processing. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows and automated processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, ensuring efficient and secure operations.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
