Camunda vs ProcessMaker comparison

Camunda and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while ProcessMaker is ranked #36. Camunda holds a 22.1% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

25,596 Views
16,481 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

599 Views
446 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

ProcessMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Camunda and ProcessMaker are competing in the business process management solutions category, each offering distinct advantages. Camunda appears to have the upper hand due to its enterprise-level features and robust open-source platform, whereas ProcessMaker offers significant value with its accessibility and adaptability.

Features: Camunda features a powerful BPMN engine, open-source flexibility, and seamless integration options ideal for complex processes. ProcessMaker provides an intuitive drag-and-drop process modeling feature, efficient low-code development capabilities, and comprehensive reporting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda supports agile deployment with extensive documentation and community support, which suits tech-savvy teams. ProcessMaker offers streamlined deployment through cloud-based and on-premise options with responsive customer service and technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda's pricing can be higher, targeting complex needs and larger organizations with tailored ROI. ProcessMaker presents a more affordable setup for small to medium-sized businesses, promising quicker cost recovery and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. ProcessMaker

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,129 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (2nd), Process Automation (1st)

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

36th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 22.1%, up from 21.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Peter Broucke

Enterprise Architect at Proximus

Support is good (even the basic one), documentation is readily available and matches the need for agile development

Probably one area I look forward to has to do with AI and how Camunda sees the AI angle on workflow. I know they're working on that or at least communicating about it. They already have versions to run on the cloud, so they've tackled that. We're looking at what they will come up with otherwise. As long as the product gets enough traction and evolves, we're happy. With open source, you can monitor what's happening. If the product is being left by many customers, that's a sign. We're also users of Camunda, and you can watch one of our guides' presentations in the States about one of our implementations. Our focus now is on developing service management and DMN APIs for the platform. AI is something we take into consideration, but we'll see what additional benefits it could bring and how to interconnect it with our data or AI engineering.

Read full review

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."

"Camunda is the best among similar solutions like JBPM and Activiti."

"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."

"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."

"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."

"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."

"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"

"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."

More Camunda pros

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

Cons

"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."

"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."

"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."

"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."

"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."

"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation."

"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."

More Camunda cons

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price depends on the number of processes that need to be automated or where the orchestration part needs to be used. The product is affordable for medium and large enterprises."

"The most attractive feature of the product is that it is open source."

"The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable."

"While the license isn't budget-friendly, careful consideration and calculated planning for a significant number of licenses can make it more cost-effective."

"I use the open-source free version."

"Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective."

"There is a bit of scope for improvement in how the licensing and pricing are done. They are based on the number of processing instances you execute on the cluster... but on the self-hosted mode, the pricing model should be customized."

"We are using the open-source version, free of charge. We didn't bother with the enterprise features."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

University

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 14% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Bonita vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Camunda

Compared 6% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 21% of the time

Apache Airflow vs ProcessMaker

Compared 13% of the time

Bizagi vs ProcessMaker

Compared 8% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

December 2024

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

December 2024

Download ProcessMaker product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Learn More

Video not available

Camunda

ProcessMaker

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. ProcessMaker

December 2024

Free Report: Camunda vs. ProcessMaker

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. ProcessMaker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.