Nintex Process Platform vs ProcessMaker comparison

Nintex and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while ProcessMaker is ranked #37. Nintex holds a 2.1% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

3,238 Views
1,844 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

560 Views
434 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

ProcessMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and ProcessMaker compete in business process management, each with unique advantages. Nintex is more flexible with integrations, while ProcessMaker offers cost-effectiveness and intuitive design.

Features: Nintex Process Platform supports a wide range of automation tools with seamless integration to platforms like Microsoft 365 and Salesforce. It’s ideal for organizations needing strong connectivity. ProcessMaker provides efficient process mapping tools and a low-code development environment. Its focus is on providing accessible and straightforward solutions. Nintex emphasizes integration capabilities, whereas ProcessMaker prioritizes user-friendly functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ProcessMaker offers cloud-based deployment, simplifying installation with minimal IT needs. Its customer service is responsive and helpful. Nintex offers both cloud and on-premise deployment but may take longer to set up. It has extensive documentation and troubleshooting resources. The ease of cloud deployment is a highlight for ProcessMaker, while Nintex benefits from dual deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform usually involves higher initial costs, focusing on long-term value through integrations and advanced features. ProcessMaker presents a budget-friendly pricing model, enabling faster ROI for organizations. While Nintex justifies its pricing with robust capabilities, ProcessMaker attracts budget-conscious buyers by balancing affordability with essential functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (8th), Workload Automation (11th)

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

37th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.1%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Damilola Adeleye

Business Automation Developer at Polaris Bank Nigeria Plc

Straightforward interface and user-friendly

There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.

Read full review

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I think the initial setup is fine."

"The technical support provided by Nintex is very helpful."

"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."

"Allows to use workflow for simple approvals and LazyApproval. The feature is easy to implement for mobile approval."

"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."

"The technical support is very good."

"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

Cons

"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."

"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."

"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."

"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."

"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."

"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."

"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."

"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"The product’s price is competitive compared to other vendors."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 29% of the time

Appian vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Camunda vs ProcessMaker

Compared 60% of the time

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 17% of the time

Apache Airflow vs ProcessMaker

Compared 13% of the time

Bizagi vs ProcessMaker

Compared 10% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

January 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

December 2024

Download ProcessMaker product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Learn More

Nintex

ProcessMaker

Overview

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker

January 2025

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.