Nintex Process Platform vs ProcessMaker comparison

Nintex and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.1, while ProcessMaker is ranked #37. Nintex holds a 2.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

3,023 Views
1,729 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

529 Views
414 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

ProcessMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and ProcessMaker compete in business process management, each with unique advantages. Nintex is more flexible with integrations, while ProcessMaker offers cost-effectiveness and intuitive design.

Features: Nintex Process Platform supports a wide range of automation tools with seamless integration to platforms like Microsoft 365 and Salesforce. It’s ideal for organizations needing strong connectivity. ProcessMaker provides efficient process mapping tools and a low-code development environment. Its focus is on providing accessible and straightforward solutions. Nintex emphasizes integration capabilities, whereas ProcessMaker prioritizes user-friendly functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ProcessMaker offers cloud-based deployment, simplifying installation with minimal IT needs. Its customer service is responsive and helpful. Nintex offers both cloud and on-premise deployment but may take longer to set up. It has extensive documentation and troubleshooting resources. The ease of cloud deployment is a highlight for ProcessMaker, while Nintex benefits from dual deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform usually involves higher initial costs, focusing on long-term value through integrations and advanced features. ProcessMaker presents a budget-friendly pricing model, enabling faster ROI for organizations. While Nintex justifies its pricing with robust capabilities, ProcessMaker attracts budget-conscious buyers by balancing affordability with essential functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (9th), Workload Automation (11th)

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

37th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.0%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Damilola Adeleye

Business Automation Developer at Polaris Bank Nigeria Plc

Straightforward interface and user-friendly

There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.

Read full review

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very easy to use."

"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."

"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."

"Allows us to provide desktop/laptop and mobile solutions to our users."

"It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention."

"It is a scalable product."

"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

Cons

"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."

"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."

"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."

"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."

"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."

"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."

"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"

"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

13%

Educational Organization

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 29% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Appian vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Ivanti Automation vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Camunda vs ProcessMaker

Compared 60% of the time

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 19% of the time

Bizagi vs ProcessMaker

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs ProcessMaker

Compared 10% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

February 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

February 2025

Download ProcessMaker product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Overview

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

ProcessMaker

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker

January 2025

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.