Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Camunda vs Newgen OmniFlow comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Camunda improves ROI by reducing costs, enhancing efficiency, saving time, and offering robust BPMN and DMN integration tools.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Camunda's support is helpful but inconsistent, with enterprise users benefiting more, while smaller businesses face pricing and support challenges.
Sentiment score
5.6
Newgen OmniFlow's customer service is mixed, praised for dedication but criticized for response times and expertise issues.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Camunda offers scalability with technologies like Spring Boot and Docker, though database dependencies and auto-scaling improvements remain challenges.
Sentiment score
7.1
Newgen OmniFlow scalability is mixed, with satisfactory performance but challenges with process enhancements requiring external support.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Camunda is highly stable and reliable, often scoring 7-10 in stability, with minor issues in integrations and configurations.
Sentiment score
6.6
Newgen OmniFlow is stable but requires monitoring, rated seven out of ten due to security concerns and server issues.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
 

Room For Improvement

Camunda users seek better navigation, customization, integrations, documentation, security, language support, performance, visualization, and support services improvements.
Newgen OmniFlow requires agile teams, better integration, user-friendly interface, customization, automation, and improved reporting and analytics capabilities.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
 

Setup Cost

Camunda's enterprise version is costly, prompting many to choose the free edition or seek alternatives for advanced features.
Newgen OmniFlow licensing is user-based with negotiable elements, seen as cost-effective but cloud options are pricier.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
 

Valuable Features

Camunda offers lightweight, flexible BPMN 2.0 compliance, open-source access, microservices orchestration, and user-friendly tools for process automation.
Newgen OmniFlow offers flexibility, quick integration, user-friendly tools, and customization, making it attractive for diverse organizational needs.
 

Categories and Ranking

Camunda
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (2nd), Process Automation (1st)
Newgen OmniFlow
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
35th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 22.1%, up from 21.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Newgen OmniFlow is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Peter Broucke - PeerSpot reviewer
Support is good (even the basic one), documentation is readily available and matches the need for agile development
Probably one area I look forward to has to do with AI and how Camunda sees the AI angle on workflow. I know they're working on that or at least communicating about it. They already have versions to run on the cloud, so they've tackled that. We're looking at what they will come up with otherwise. As long as the product gets enough traction and evolves, we're happy. With open source, you can monitor what's happening. If the product is being left by many customers, that's a sign. We're also users of Camunda, and you can watch one of our guides' presentations in the States about one of our implementations. Our focus now is on developing service management and DMN APIs for the platform. AI is something we take into consideration, but we'll see what additional benefits it could bring and how to interconnect it with our data or AI engineering.
JJ
Flexible in terms of how the UI assists users working in a variety of roles
Our initial setup was complex because we are guaranteed to have approximately two thousand concurrent users. We began first with a couple of servers, then after a couple of years, as we saw that the usage was going up, we grew both horizontally and vertically. We have a pretty big team here, with fifteen huge processes. I would say that from a development perspective, building one complex process will take a couple of developers, and an additional person is required to exclusively handle the support. There are many factors to it. In our organization, we need 24/7 support because we have trade finances that work in the middle of the night. We require additional support to accommodate people working in shifts. If change requests come in then one developer may be able to handle three processes. In the case of a new requirement, there is normally one developer who works with the team leader that is monitoring the entire setup.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
13%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Newgen OmniFlow?
The pricing of Newgen OmniFlow is fair. That said, there is a need for standardization in pricing, rather than leaving it to the discretion of the salespeople.
What needs improvement with Newgen OmniFlow?
Improvement is needed in supporting the partner ecosystem.
What is your primary use case for Newgen OmniFlow?
Customers use Newgen OmniFlow for its ease of deployment, ease of use, ease of integrations, and efficiency improvement in terms of process automation. It is agile in terms of deployment to customers.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Camunda BPM
OmniFlow
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
Rak Bank, Bank Dhofar
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.