Camunda vs Newgen OmniFlow comparison

Camunda and Newgen are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Newgen is ranked #37. Camunda holds a 21.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to Newgen’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Newgen users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

21,240 Views
14,235 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Newgen OmniFlow

Read 8 Newgen OmniFlow reviews

877 Views
516 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

Newgen OmniFlow

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Newgen OmniFlow and Camunda are competing products in the business process management arena. While Newgen OmniFlow is favored for its pricing and customer support, Camunda stands out with its feature-rich offering, appealing to tech-savvy teams.

Features: Newgen OmniFlow is known for its comprehensive process automation, strong document management, and easy integration with third-party apps. It also offers a user-friendly interface with low-code/no-code designer tools and excellent integration capabilities. Camunda, on the other hand, is recognized for its open-source platform, rich developer tools, and adaptability to various programming languages. Its lightweight architecture, wide BPMN standard coverage, and advanced REST API features are particularly valuable.

Room for Improvement: Newgen OmniFlow could benefit from enhancing its process customization options, improving documentation for new users, and expanding support for community-driven innovations. Camunda can improve by simplifying its deployment process, expanding customer service beyond community forums, and offering more intuitive tools for non-developer users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Newgen OmniFlow has a straightforward deployment process guided by a responsive customer service team, beneficial for organizations new to BPM. Camunda's setup, while more involved due to its flexible, developer-focus, is balanced by an active online community and comprehensive documentation resources.

Pricing and ROI: Newgen OmniFlow's affordability and quick ROI are appealing for those with budget constraints. It offers lower setup costs, making it attractive for small to mid-sized enterprises. Camunda, however, justifies its higher cost with feature depth, offering significant long-term ROI for organizations prepared to invest in customization and development.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st)

Newgen OmniFlow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 21.3%, up from 21.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Newgen OmniFlow is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

JoyceJose

Chief Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Flexible in terms of how the UI assists users working in a variety of roles

Our initial setup was complex because we are guaranteed to have approximately two thousand concurrent users. We began first with a couple of servers, then after a couple of years, as we saw that the usage was going up, we grew both horizontally and vertically. We have a pretty big team here, with fifteen huge processes. I would say that from a development perspective, building one complex process will take a couple of developers, and an additional person is required to exclusively handle the support. There are many factors to it. In our organization, we need 24/7 support because we have trade finances that work in the middle of the night. We require additional support to accommodate people working in shifts. If change requests come in then one developer may be able to handle three processes. In the case of a new requirement, there is normally one developer who works with the team leader that is monitoring the entire setup.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"On a scale of one to ten, I rate ECS a ten out of ten."

"The graphical interface is very beneficial."

"Camunda is the best among similar solutions like JBPM and Activiti."

"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."

"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."

"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."

"It has an open BPM"

"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."

More Camunda pros

"The most valuable features of Newgen OmniFlow are the user interface, the low-code no-code designer tools, and the integration models are important."

"The most valuable feature for us is the Omnicon. That made sense for us because our company is now able to capture information from documents."

"Newgen will structure the system based on all the requirements of the business. We can design the forms as complex forms or make our own versions to fix what's wrong."

"It is working fine so far. I haven't heard anything bad about it from the applications team that is using it, so I assume that it is doing okay."

"The most valuable feature is the flexibility in using it."

"The integration capabilities of Newgen OmniFlow are excellent due to its ready APIs, enabling easy API creation for consumption across different systems."

"They are a good team that is proactive, and they are trying to accommodate all of our requirements."

"The UI is easy. It's not very code based, so you can make certain changes on your end."

Cons

"It has a Postgres database at the backend, and it is very difficult to scale if you increase the number of processes running. We did hit some barriers. We were able to overcome them, but it was a problem. Camunda has another product called Camunda Cloud, which supposedly doesn't have the same scalability problems, but we are not using Camunda Cloud because the set of features is smaller than Camunda On-Premises. So, its scalability can be improved. Because it has a single database, it is more difficult to scale if you have a huge success."

"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation."

"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."

"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."

"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."

"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."

"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."

More Camunda cons

"In terms of stability, like every product it has its issues."

"We had consistent issues of Newgen OmniFlow crashing. It's not compatible with bounce browsers like Chrome."

"The development teams should be more agile and they need to have more team members."

"Improvement is needed in supporting the partner ecosystem."

"Newgen OmniFlow could improve by having more out-of-the-box integration modules. It would be beneficial to have an analytics model that is not currently present."

"I would like to see more automated analytics built into the solution."

"At the system level, I would like to see things be much more flexible, especially for different document templates and introducing changes."

"There should be some reporting and dashboarding capabilities. I don't see such capabilities built into it. Sometimes, the leadership wants to understand the business cases that we want to automate. We face a lot of challenges to justify why we are using Newgen, and we need a way to present that to the leadership. If there is something out of the box and if we can get meaningful dashboards and reporting capabilities, it would be helpful."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a bit of scope for improvement in how the licensing and pricing are done. They are based on the number of processing instances you execute on the cluster... but on the self-hosted mode, the pricing model should be customized."

"We pay for the license of this solution annually."

"There were some features that were only available in the paid version."

"Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective."

"The product is expensive for a small or medium-sized company."

"We are using the community version. There is no licensing cost."

"It is good for a startup. When we started, its price was fair, but the way we are using it to orchestrate microservices makes it expensive. When you are growing as a company, you would have more microservices, and you would have more users. There is an exponential effect when you are growing in terms of the number of conditions, processes, and users because they bill you per process. So, the price was increasing very quickly for us, and it was very difficult."

"The most attractive feature of the product is that it is open source."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"Its price is a bit on the high side, but that's okay. From a company perspective, it is reasonable."

"The price of Newgen OmniFlow is priced reasonably."

"The on-prem solution is affordable. The cloud solution is more expensive. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing fees."

"Overall, this solution is very cost effective when compared to other solutions in the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

13%

Real Estate/Law Firm

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Newgen OmniFlow?

The pricing of Newgen OmniFlow is fair. That said, there is a need for standardization in pricing, rather than leaving it to the discretion of the salespeople.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Newgen OmniFlow?

Improvement is needed in supporting the partner ecosystem.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Newgen OmniFlow?

Customers use Newgen OmniFlow for its ease of deployment, ease of use, ease of integrations, and efficiency improvement in terms of process automation. It is agile in terms of deployment to customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

IBM BPM vs Newgen OmniFlow

Compared 23% of the time

Appian vs Newgen OmniFlow

Compared 14% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs Newgen OmniFlow

Compared 13% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs Newgen OmniFlow

Compared 11% of the time

More Newgen OmniFlow Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

April 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Newgen OmniFlow

April 2025

Download Newgen OmniFlow product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

OmniFlow

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda

Platform-independent, scalable Business Process Management solution that enables automation of organizational business processes. It has seamless integration abilities allowing it to be introduced into any IT infrastructure. OmniFlow is designed to ease the creation, deployment, modification and management of Business Processes with no programming effort and differentiates with other Business Process Management products through its ability to deploy rapidly to automate a complete process.

Newgen

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Rak Bank, Bank Dhofar

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow

April 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.