Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

Camunda and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3. Camunda holds a 22.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

24,366 Views
15,887 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 13 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

612 Views
457 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and Camunda compete in digital transformation and process automation. OpenText 360 for SharePoint has the upper hand in integration and customer support, while Camunda excels in feature set, appealing to technical users despite higher costs.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft ecosystems, providing robust document management and collaboration tools. It supports secure workflows and integrates easily with Microsoft Teams. Camunda offers a powerful open-source platform with BPMN-based workflow automation, decision management, and flexible scalability, allowing extensive customization and development by IT teams.

Room for Improvement: OpenText 360 for SharePoint may benefit from enhanced workflow customization options and expanded non-Microsoft integrations. Additionally, improving documentation could aid users in maximizing platform capabilities. Camunda could improve by simplifying initial setup processes, enhancing user-friendliness for non-technical users, and expanding official support for easier integration across more diverse tech environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers straightforward deployment in Microsoft environments and responsive customer service tailored to enterprise needs. Camunda, while requiring a more technical setup, provides comprehensive support resources, including detailed documentation and community forums, appealing to those with technical expertise and customization needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint typically involves higher setup costs but delivers substantial ROI through streamlined operations and integration. Camunda offers a cost-effective entry due to its open-source model, though customization may increase costs. Despite higher costs, OpenText's integration efficiency justifies the expense, while Camunda offers economic advantages for businesses with technical development capacity.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (2nd), Process Automation (1st)

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

26th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 22.2%, up from 21.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.4%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Ravi Krishnan S

Head - Financial Reporting and Taxation at TVS Capital Funds

Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive

OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."

"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."

"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."

"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."

"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."

", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."

"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."

"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."

More Camunda pros

"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."

"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."

"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."

"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."

"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

Cons

"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."

"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."

"It would be better if the tool were made less reliant on Java."

"Lacking in forms visualization."

"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."

"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."

"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."

"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."

More Camunda cons

"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."

"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."

"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."

"The user interface could definitely be improved."

"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."

"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

"I tried to get some information about buying the license for the solution, but I found it kind of hard to understand the business model."

"Its price is decent. Everything is included in the license. The Community version is also good to start with. We are using the Community version."

"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"It has a reasonable price."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"On-premises version is expensive"

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Government

13%

Legal Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

The price is not cheap but entirely reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 13% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Bonita vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

January 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

January 2025

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

Learn More

Video not available

Camunda

OpenText

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

January 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.