Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Camunda enhances financial companies' efficiency and cost-effectiveness with streamlined processes, reusable code, and reduced operational expenses.
Sentiment score
8.1
OpenText 360 for SharePoint provided strong ROI through efficient document management and durable on-premises performance with 100% ROI achievement.
It eliminates the challenges associated with handling files on local servers and allows efficient document management.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Camunda's customer service is praised for engineer support but has mixed reviews on responsiveness, knowledge center, and pricing.
Sentiment score
6.8
OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides 24/7 highly-rated support, although resolution times vary with complexity and component differences.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
I have not directly contacted vendor support but use forums for any queries or issues while utilizing OpenText 360 for SharePoint.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Camunda provides scalable solutions with technologies like Spring Boot and Kubernetes, though database configuration may present challenges for some users.
Sentiment score
7.4
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is scalable for many users, though integration complexity sometimes limits its perceived scalability.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
It allows for easy scaling, especially with ECS service configurations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Camunda is praised for stability and reliability, with minor integration challenges and occasional bugs, rated 7-10 by users.
Sentiment score
7.2
Users praise OpenText 360 for SharePoint's stability and enhancements but note integration issues and room for feature improvement.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
 

Room For Improvement

Camunda's platform faces user dissatisfaction due to poor user-friendliness, documentation, performance, and costly licensing, needing significant improvements.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint needs improved UI, Office 365 integration, simpler licensing, better support, and enhanced performance features.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
Integration with a feature like Planner could assist in assigning tasks to specific individuals for follow-up.
The GUI should be improved for better user experience.
 

Setup Cost

Camunda provides cost-effective enterprise licenses, though costs can rise with usage, posing concerns for smaller companies.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is costly, with complex licensing, and receives moderate pricing satisfaction from users.
For some services, such as hosting databases, Google is really expensive.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
Pricing is very affordable as it is part of the Office 365 suite, costing around five dollars per user.
In terms of pricing, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is more expensive than Microsoft.
 

Valuable Features

Camunda offers flexible, lightweight architecture supporting BPMN, CMMN, and DMN, with user-friendly, non-programmer interfaces and seamless integration.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint enhances collaboration, customization, and security with flexible integration, automation, and multi-device accessibility.
ECS also allows for horizontal scalability with thresholds that can be configured for CPU or memory.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers.
It offers automation capabilities with Power Automate, enabling automation of invoicing with API support from SAP.
 

Categories and Ranking

Camunda
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
77
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
27th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 21.3%, up from 21.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.3%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewer
Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.
Ravi Krishnan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive
OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Government
13%
Legal Firm
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
In terms of pricing, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is more expensive than Microsoft. On a scale of one to ten, I rate its price as six.
What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes. Specifically, integration with a feature like Planner could assist in assigning tasks to speci...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Camunda BPM
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.