Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Camunda vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM comparison

Camunda and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while TIBCO is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.7. Camunda holds a 21.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.
Camunda
Read 77 Camunda reviews
  • 21,240 Views
  • 14,235 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Read 7 TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reviews
  • 502 Views
  • 361 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Camunda and TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM compete in business process management. Camunda has the upper hand in pricing and support, indicating a better ROI perception among users.

Features: Camunda provides open-source flexibility and lightweight process modeling, offering customizable solutions that integrate with microservices. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is recognized for a robust architecture supporting complex enterprise processes with comprehensive monitoring and optimization capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Camunda could enhance its user interface and documentation for beginners and improve the performance for enterprise-level applications. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM might benefit from simplifying its initial setup, improving user-friendliness, and enhancing flexibility to cater to diverse deployment scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda offers simpler deployment with a developer-friendly environment, allowing faster project starts and integration. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, though promising scalability, has a complex initial setup but offers robust enterprise support.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda's cost-effective open-source model ensures minimal initial investment, suitable for quick scalability and iterative projects. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, despite higher setup costs, delivers significant returns in extensive, complex deployment scenarios.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Camunda
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
77
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st)
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
32nd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 21.3%, up from 21.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewer
Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.
Read full review
Ray Ochieng - PeerSpot reviewer
Powerful workflow definition enhances operational stability and efficiency
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows. It is low code, so you don't need a lot of coding, and tasks are just drag and drop. It is also very stable as we haven't had issues with it going down or encountering any operational issues for a long time. The stability and rich features in workflow definition make it a valuable tool.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"
"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."
"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
More Camunda pros
"The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature."
"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."
"It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."
"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."
"For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with."
"The scheduling and the calendar are very useful."
"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."
 

Cons

"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"Initially, installation was challenging, but recent improvements have made it much easier."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"Documentation can be improved."
"While it's very scalable, it would be great if auto-scaling capabilities were added to it... one area that really could help out would be to have dynamic resizing of the cluster. Right now, you have to do capacity planning."
More Camunda cons
"ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."
"The maintenance of the package could be improved."
"My experience with tech support has not been very good. Most of the time, issues are escalated to level three, where they are either unresolved or take two weeks to address."
"The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily."
"The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU."
"Technical support needs to be streamlined."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
"I tried to get some information about buying the license for the solution, but I found it kind of hard to understand the business model."
"The product is expensive for a small or medium-sized company."
"Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective."
"The license is quite expensive, which is why we went with the community version."
"Camunda Platform is an open-source product."
"We are using the community version. There is no licensing cost."
"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."
More Camunda pricing and cost advice
"There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."
"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is an expensive tool compared to others."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
45%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
See all answers
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
See all answers
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
See all answers
What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?
The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.
See all answers
What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?
It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU. Making it lightweight so it can run on a minimum processor and less memory would be beneficial. Additionally, the current wo...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?
We are using TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM for network deployment workflows. For example, if a customer is interested in getting a NetWorker, there is a workflow where we log in, get the customer details,...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda Logo
Apache Airflow vs Camunda
Compared 12% of the time
Flowable vs Camunda Logo
Flowable vs Camunda
Compared 9% of the time
Bizagi vs Camunda Logo
Bizagi vs Camunda
Compared 8% of the time
Temporal vs Camunda Logo
Temporal vs Camunda
Compared 7% of the time
IBM BPM vs Camunda Logo
IBM BPM vs Camunda
Compared 7% of the time
More Camunda Competitors
Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Logo
Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Compared 33% of the time
IBM BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Logo
IBM BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Compared 23% of the time
More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Camunda
April 2025
Camunda reportDownload Camunda product report
Buyer's Guide
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
March 2025
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reportDownload TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM product report
 

Also Known As

Camunda BPM
No data available
 

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.
TIBCO
 

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank
Buyer's Guide
Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
April 2025
Free Report: Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.