Camunda vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM comparison

Camunda and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while TIBCO is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.5. Camunda holds a 9.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

20,866 Views
13,354 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Read 7 TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reviews

857 Views
840 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Camunda and TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM compete in business process management. Camunda has the upper hand in pricing and support, indicating a better ROI perception among users.

Features: Camunda provides open-source flexibility and lightweight process modeling, offering customizable solutions that integrate with microservices. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is recognized for a robust architecture supporting complex enterprise processes with comprehensive monitoring and optimization capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Camunda could enhance its user interface and documentation for beginners and improve the performance for enterprise-level applications. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM might benefit from simplifying its initial setup, improving user-friendliness, and enhancing flexibility to cater to diverse deployment scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda offers simpler deployment with a developer-friendly environment, allowing faster project starts and integration. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, though promising scalability, has a complex initial setup but offers robust enterprise support.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda's cost-effective open-source model ensures minimal initial investment, suitable for quick scalability and iterative projects. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, despite higher setup costs, delivers significant returns in extensive, complex deployment scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,260 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (3rd), AI Software Development (3rd), AI Customer Support (48th), AI IT Support (5th)

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

29th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 9.3%, down from 21.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	9.3%
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM	0.9%
Other	89.8%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Ray Ochieng

Integration Lead at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Powerful workflow definition enhances operational stability and efficiency

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows. It is low code, so you don't need a lot of coding, and tasks are just drag and drop. It is also very stable as we haven't had issues with it going down or encountering any operational issues for a long time. The stability and rich features in workflow definition make it a valuable tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."

"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."

"One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era."

"It is an absolutely stable solution."

"Overall, the solution has been very solid."

"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."

"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."

"The product is stable."

More Camunda pros

"For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with."

"The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."

"The scheduling and the calendar are very useful."

Cons

"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."

"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."

"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."

"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."

"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."

"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."

"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."

"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."

More Camunda cons

"ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."

"It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU."

"My experience with tech support has not been very good. Most of the time, issues are escalated to level three, where they are either unresolved or take two weeks to address."

"Technical support needs to be streamlined."

"The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily."

"The maintenance of the package could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is good for a startup. When we started, its price was fair, but the way we are using it to orchestrate microservices makes it expensive. When you are growing as a company, you would have more microservices, and you would have more users. There is an exponential effect when you are growing in terms of the number of conditions, processes, and users because they bill you per process. So, the price was increasing very quickly for us, and it was very difficult."

"The price is competitive with products like Bonitasoft and RHPAM (Red Hat Process Automation Manager). We have two versions of Camunda. The first version was open source, without support, but then we got a supported version."

"There were some features that were only available in the paid version."

"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

"The open-source version of the product is free to use."

"We use the free version."

"We have an annual subscription to this solution."

"We're using the free version. We used the Enterprise version for some time. If I compare free versus what we paid at that time, the Enterprise version costs a lot. For the additional functionality that we got with the Enterprise version, it was too costly."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is an expensive tool compared to others."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU. Making it lightweight so it can run on a minimum processor and less memory would be beneficial. Additionally, the current wo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

We are using TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM for network deployment workflows. For example, if a customer is interested in getting a NetWorker, there is a workflow where we log in, get the customer details,...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Camunda

Compared 6% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 14% of the time

TIBCO iProcess Suite vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 10% of the time

Bizagi vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 10% of the time

AgilePoint vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 10% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

February 2026

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

January 2026

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

TIBCO

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

February 2026

Free Report: Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.