Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Logo

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM pros and cons

Vendor: TIBCO
3.7 out of 5

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production with very low downtime.
The engine is robust, scalable, and allows quick development and change requests.
Its deployment process is straightforward and supports automation, especially with version 6.x using Maven.
Compared to Mulesoft, deployment and configuration with TIBCO are easier.
Features like scheduling, calendar, and workflow job distribution are useful.

CONS

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM needs better integration with complex BPM constructs and wider platform compatibility.
Transition to the cloud has been slower compared to competitors like Dell Boomi and Mulesoft.
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM's technical support requires streamlining.
The scalability of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is a concern needing improvement.
Package maintenance for TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM could be enhanced.
 

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Pros review quotes

RM
Jun 23, 2019
For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with.
Ray Ochieng - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 19, 2021
The scheduling and the calendar are very useful.
GouravSuri - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 13, 2024
The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.
Learn what your peers think about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1115901 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 24, 2020
It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO.
RC
Jul 31, 2023
The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature.
 

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Cons review quotes

RM
Jun 23, 2019
The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily.
Ray Ochieng - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 19, 2021
Technical support needs to be streamlined.
GouravSuri - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 13, 2024
The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.
Learn what your peers think about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1115901 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 24, 2020
ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back.
RC
Jul 31, 2023
The maintenance of the package could be improved.