AWS Step Functions vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2, while TIBCO is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

AWS Step Functions

Read 12 AWS Step Functions reviews

2,746 Views
2,284 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Read 6 TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reviews

512 Views
399 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Step Functions

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and AWS Step Functions compete in the process automation market. AWS Step Functions appears to have the upper hand due to superior features and seamless cloud integration.

Features: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM offers comprehensive process management, an intuitive user interface, and robust integration capabilities using its ESB. AWS Step Functions provides easy-to-use serverless orchestration, a user-friendly graphical interface for workflow visualization, and seamless integration with AWS services.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM could improve its deployment complexity and enhance cloud-native support. It also needs to streamline its initial setup process. AWS Step Functions can benefit from expanding non-AWS integration options and enhancing support for complex on-prem solutions. Increased workflow customization options would also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM requires extensive on-premises deployment planning, offering deep customization for enterprises. AWS Step Functions provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment model with rapid scaling, minimal maintenance, and robust AWS customer support.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM has a higher initial setup cost, promising long-term ROI through business process optimization. AWS Step Functions uses a pay-as-you-go model with lower upfront costs, allowing faster ROI in cloud-centric operations and flexible scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Step Functions

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (13th)

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

32nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AWS Step Functions is 2.4%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Carlos Alberto Marangon

Senior AWS Tech Lead at Nextios

Automate complex workflows with seamless AWS integration

Step Functions provide seamless integration with AWS services, which enhances the speed of application development. The JSON app launched recently allows us to define data execution more easily. The Standard Workflows feature includes error replay capabilities, which are crucial for efficient error management. The Amazon State Language (ASL) in JSON format facilitates workflow automation and accelerates the deployment of Step Functions.

Read full review

GouravSuri

Software Engineer (L4) at Uber

Useful for case management and business process management, but needs to improve the documentation part

The product was implemented for process automation in our company since TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM serves as a complete integration suite that helps manage external integrations as well. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BusinessWorks integrates with the downstream and upstream systems while giving an endpoint that could either be REST or SOAP. With the inbuilt functionalities of the product, you need not worry about the load-managing capabilities of the tool since everything in the product is taken care of by the integration suite. Depending on the use cases, the business process management area can be used as a predefined flow. If there are factors that are going to be dependent on user actions, the flow has to be kept open-ended, after which you can use a case manager. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM can be implemented in two methods, and the product supports both ways. The business processes that got optimized from the use of the product are mostly banking processes and investment banking processes. Wherever there are a lot of processes, a lot of people, and a lot of approvals, there is a need to have quick management without much coding and case management for which rapid development tools are useful. The state management part of the product is the most valuable in the product. With the integration capabilities of the product, it is possible to integrate with any of the external SOAP services. You don't have to do anything to integrate the SOAP services since all the underlying serialization and everything else is taken care of by the tool itself. There is no need to get involved in any coding activities, meaning there is zero code integration required. In any kind of product, the database becomes the bottleneck because you can scale it, and the processing part can be scalable, but at the end of the day, there is a formation of a bottleneck wherever transactions or databases are involved. In most of the business process management cases, concurrent users are not that high. The number of nodes can be scaled up. When it comes to the tool, the processing nodes can be scaled up on individual servers and multiple boxes. Like any other Java system, the scalability of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is node-based. There is a bottleneck when it comes to the database. To what extent the databases can be scaled up to support concurrent transactions is the only bottleneck when it comes to the solution. In the decision-making and analytics part, the new version of the product supports REST. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BusinessWorks manages SOAP-based integrations. The product has become simpler for new commerce to learn. The product now offers simplicity to users. The documentation and usability of the product need improvement. The solution's adoption rate can go up after the documentation gets improved and more sample-based scenarios are provided. I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS Step Functions offers advanced workflows that save time and enhance efficiency by reducing delays and ensuring consistent orchestration among various services."

"AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices."

"If you want to create a workflow to call one Lambda function after another, and other serverless features, it could save you a ton of money. That's for sure."

"The JSON app launched recently allows us to define data execution more easily."

"Overall, I would rate AWS Step Functions at least nine out of ten."

"The number of historical events is great."

"What I like the most about Amazon Step Functions is how easy it is to use."

"It's Amazon, it's scalable."

More AWS Step Functions pros

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature."

"It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."

"The scheduling and the calendar are very useful."

"For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with."

Cons

"It is hard to coordinate the declaratory language."

"The solution's data size limit can be improved."

"The solution's pricing could be cheaper. It is cheaper than Airflow."

"The interface can sometimes feel limited, as we're unable to see what AWS is running behind the scenes."

"It is difficult to suggest improvements at the moment."

"It wasn't easy to understand the licensing model. It's like if you use just a little, it's cheap, but it becomes more expensive as you use more. It's like a hook that ties you inside the Amazon ecosystem. So, it creates a dependency."

"The price and support are areas with shortcomings where the solution needs to improve."

"Increasing the payload size would be beneficial."

More AWS Step Functions cons

"The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Technical support needs to be streamlined."

"The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily."

"The maintenance of the package could be improved."

"ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is an expensive tool compared to others."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

45%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Step Functions?

The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Step Functions?

I use Step Functions for orchestrating several application workflows. Specifically, I often use Step Functions to automate processes requiring multiple steps and for application orchestration. I fo...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Step Functions?

Overall, I would rate AWS Step Functions at least nine out of ten. The technology is robust, but improving the payload size could enhance the product's utility further.

See all answers

What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

The product fails to offer good integration with REST, making it an area where improvements are required. The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

I use the solution in my company for case management and business process management. In general, there are two kinds of use cases attached to the product. For case management, you need to have sol...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 37% of the time

IBM BPM vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 19% of the time

Control-M vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 9% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS Step Functions Competitors

Camunda vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 44% of the time

Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 32% of the time

IBM BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 24% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions

February 2025

Download AWS Step Functions product report

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

January 2025

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM product report

Also Known As

Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions

No data available

Overview

AWS Step Functions enables orchestration of complex workflows, parallel task execution, and seamless integration with AWS services, simplifying ETL automation and data pipeline management.

With AWS Step Functions, developers streamline task automation and ensure smooth microservices orchestration. It simplifies development and manages interdependencies, validates data, and integrates AWS services for cost-effective workflows. It offers a user-friendly graphical interface for creating pipelines, scalable parallelization via the "map" state, control over historical events, and visualization with JSON. Enhanced by a dashboard-like view, it aids in visual workflows and debugging.

What are the most valuable features?

Seamless AWS Integration: Easily integrates with the entire AWS suite for efficient workflow creation.
User-Friendly Graphical Interface: Simplifies creating and managing workflows with visual tools.
Scalable Parallelization: Utilizes the "map" state for efficient parallel processing tasks.
Control Historical Events: Manages and controls historical data and events effectively.
Visualization and Debugging: Provides a dashboard-like view to enhance understanding and debugging.

What are the benefits and ROI to look for?

Streamlined Development: Simplifies orchestration and automates task management.
Cost-Effective Workflows: Creates efficient, cost-saving workflows by integrating with AWS services.
Enhanced Data Validation: Ensures data correctness by managing interdependencies.
Automation of ETL Jobs: Automates data extraction, transformation, and loading processes seamlessly.

In specific industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, enterprises implement AWS Step Functions to manage data pipelines, orchestrate microservices, and automate complex ETL jobs. They benefit from seamless integration with AWS services, enhanced data validation, and streamlined development, resulting in efficient and cost-effective workflows tailored to their operational needs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite

ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

January 2025

Free Report: AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.