AWS Step Functions vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while TIBCO is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

AWS Step Functions

Read 12 AWS Step Functions reviews

2,555 Views
2,001 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Read 7 TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reviews

501 Views
371 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Step Functions

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and AWS Step Functions compete in the process automation market. AWS Step Functions appears to have the upper hand due to superior features and seamless cloud integration.

Features: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM offers comprehensive process management, an intuitive user interface, and robust integration capabilities using its ESB. AWS Step Functions provides easy-to-use serverless orchestration, a user-friendly graphical interface for workflow visualization, and seamless integration with AWS services.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM could improve its deployment complexity and enhance cloud-native support. It also needs to streamline its initial setup process. AWS Step Functions can benefit from expanding non-AWS integration options and enhancing support for complex on-prem solutions. Increased workflow customization options would also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM requires extensive on-premises deployment planning, offering deep customization for enterprises. AWS Step Functions provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment model with rapid scaling, minimal maintenance, and robust AWS customer support.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM has a higher initial setup cost, promising long-term ROI through business process optimization. AWS Step Functions uses a pay-as-you-go model with lower upfront costs, allowing faster ROI in cloud-centric operations and flexible scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Step Functions

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (13th)

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

32nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AWS Step Functions is 2.4%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Carlos Alberto Marangon

Senior AWS Tech Lead at Nextios

Automate complex workflows with seamless AWS integration

Step Functions provide seamless integration with AWS services, which enhances the speed of application development. The JSON app launched recently allows us to define data execution more easily. The Standard Workflows feature includes error replay capabilities, which are crucial for efficient error management. The Amazon State Language (ASL) in JSON format facilitates workflow automation and accelerates the deployment of Step Functions.

Read full review

Ray Ochieng

Integration Lead at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Powerful workflow definition enhances operational stability and efficiency

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows. It is low code, so you don't need a lot of coding, and tasks are just drag and drop. It is also very stable as we haven't had issues with it going down or encountering any operational issues for a long time. The stability and rich features in workflow definition make it a valuable tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky."

"AWS Step Functions offers advanced workflows that save time and enhance efficiency by reducing delays and ensuring consistent orchestration among various services."

"The number of historical events is great."

"The solution is stable...The solution is easy to scale."

"Overall, I would rate AWS Step Functions at least nine out of ten."

"One can rate all the calls and that is a good feature."

"The JSON app launched recently allows us to define data execution more easily."

"AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices."

More AWS Step Functions pros

"The scheduling and the calendar are very useful."

"It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."

"The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature."

"For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with."

Cons

"It is difficult to suggest improvements at the moment."

"The price and support are areas with shortcomings where the solution needs to improve."

"The pricing of the solution can be improved."

"The interface can sometimes feel limited, as we're unable to see what AWS is running behind the scenes."

"It is hard to coordinate the declaratory language."

"Setup took about one day. We had some errors to understand in the beginning, but now everything is working good."

"Increasing the payload size would be beneficial."

"If AWS Step Functions keeps adding more integrations, it would be even better."

More AWS Step Functions cons

"Technical support needs to be streamlined."

"It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU."

"ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."

"My experience with tech support has not been very good. Most of the time, issues are escalated to level three, where they are either unresolved or take two weeks to address."

"The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily."

"The maintenance of the package could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The solution is expensive."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is an expensive tool compared to others."

"There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

44%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Step Functions?

The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Step Functions?

I use Step Functions for orchestrating several application workflows. Specifically, I often use Step Functions to automate processes requiring multiple steps and for application orchestration. I fo...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Step Functions?

Overall, I would rate AWS Step Functions at least nine out of ten. The technology is robust, but improving the payload size could enhance the product's utility further.

See all answers

What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU. Making it lightweight so it can run on a minimum processor and less memory would be beneficial. Additionally, the current wo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

We are using TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM for network deployment workflows. For example, if a customer is interested in getting a NetWorker, there is a workflow where we log in, get the customer details,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 36% of the time

IBM BPM vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 18% of the time

Control-M vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 10% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 8% of the time

Pega Platform vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 6% of the time

More AWS Step Functions Competitors

Camunda vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 45% of the time

Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 29% of the time

IBM BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 26% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions

March 2025

Download AWS Step Functions product report

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

February 2025

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM product report

Also Known As

Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions

No data available

Overview

AWS Step Functions enables orchestration of complex workflows, parallel task execution, and seamless integration with AWS services, simplifying ETL automation and data pipeline management.

With AWS Step Functions, developers streamline task automation and ensure smooth microservices orchestration. It simplifies development and manages interdependencies, validates data, and integrates AWS services for cost-effective workflows. It offers a user-friendly graphical interface for creating pipelines, scalable parallelization via the "map" state, control over historical events, and visualization with JSON. Enhanced by a dashboard-like view, it aids in visual workflows and debugging.

What are the most valuable features?

Seamless AWS Integration: Easily integrates with the entire AWS suite for efficient workflow creation.
User-Friendly Graphical Interface: Simplifies creating and managing workflows with visual tools.
Scalable Parallelization: Utilizes the "map" state for efficient parallel processing tasks.
Control Historical Events: Manages and controls historical data and events effectively.
Visualization and Debugging: Provides a dashboard-like view to enhance understanding and debugging.

What are the benefits and ROI to look for?

Streamlined Development: Simplifies orchestration and automates task management.
Cost-Effective Workflows: Creates efficient, cost-saving workflows by integrating with AWS services.
Enhanced Data Validation: Ensures data correctness by managing interdependencies.
Automation of ETL Jobs: Automates data extraction, transformation, and loading processes seamlessly.

In specific industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, enterprises implement AWS Step Functions to manage data pipelines, orchestrate microservices, and automate complex ETL jobs. They benefit from seamless integration with AWS services, enhanced data validation, and streamlined development, resulting in efficient and cost-effective workflows tailored to their operational needs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite

ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

March 2025

Free Report: AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.