ManageEngine Password Manager Pro vs WALLIX Bastion comparison

"It is user-friendly. Someone who doesn’t have a lot of IT knowledge can work with the product easily."

"ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is cheaper than other products, such as BeyondTrust, and is more than 50% cheaper compared to the Boomer solution we used before."

"The tool is secure, safe, reliable, and easy to use."

"The support from the customer service team is good, they respond on time, and they always seem to be quite knowledgeable."

"The auditing feature is particularly valuable as it makes privileged account usage auditable."

"It is very safe and we haven't had any security issues."

"The security provided is very enhanced and it does a great job of keeping passwords safe."

"The solution's technical support team is helpful."

"Bastion provides a kind of isolation between the administration laptop and the server you want to administer."

"Bastion provides a kind of isolation between the administration laptop and the server you want to administer."

"Its video recording capabilities have definitely been key for us."

"We use WALLIX Bastion to provide access and to monitor sessions."

"I like that it's Linux-based, and you don't need to have separate implementations, extra database licenses, or enterprise licenses. I think because it's Linux-based, it's more seamless than Windows. I also like the access manager, which I think is a super tool. Everything is browser-based, and you don't need a VPN. So, that's a great thing."

"The interface is very simple. It doesn't need any plug-ins, just browsers that are installed at the beginning."

"WALLIX Bastion's most valuable feature is the Access Manager because you can use it and access the data center without any client VPN."

"The user interface could be improved and made more user friendly."

"There is room for improvement in making the UI more user-friendly."

"The support for the PAM product is not very prompt."

"The support for the PAM product is not very prompt."

"It's a pretty technical solution. It's designed for more technical people."

"The product doesn't have behavior analytics. They promised to develop this, but only for the cloud, not for on-premise versions."

"It would be better if I could manage multiple accounts in one place, like CyberArk. With WALLIX, you can only manage one account, and you are given a separate category. You have to click on each connection to do anything. For example, CyberArk might give three options for one connection if you want to have an interactive user-level experience. But with WALLIX, you have to click three times to get that access. Also, the biggest disadvantage of WALLIX is the reporting. I feel like it's very weak in reporting when compared to the other solutions. As a solution, they're good and stable. But they need to make their reports neater and better. Right now, we're going to the console and then pressing buttons every single time."

"There could be more automation features for the solution."

"WALLIX Bastion is GUI-driven, but it sometimes needs some management."

"For me, the main issue has to do with the system performance itself."

"The main problem of Bastion, CyberArk, and WALLIX is that they have the same interface for both administration and users, which is not a good idea from a security perspective."

"The performance of WALLIX Bastion's password manager is very low."

"Based on my experience as a sales tech person, one area of improvement could be a more unified licensing model."

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the pricing of this solution as a five."

"Some extra price needs to be paid for license."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to that of other products."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."