Microsoft Azure API Management vs Postman comparison

Microsoft Azure API Management and Postman are key players in the API management arena. Based on various factors like developer support, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness, Postman appears to have a slight advantage due to its user-friendly interface and free availability.

Features: Microsoft Azure API Management offers robust access management, seamless integration with Active Directory, and the ability to create new products by combining APIs. It also provides a comprehensive developer portal. Postman is known for its simplicity, offering excellent collaboration features and automation capabilities that make API testing easier with collections.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure API Management could improve its versioning features, third-party integrations, and pricing transparency. Users often cite the costs and need for better scalability. Postman could enhance its data-driven testing and offer better database integrations. It could also focus more on collaborative features and collections management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure API Management supports flexible deployment across public and hybrid clouds with enterprise-level support. However, its technical support can sometimes be slow. Postman is predominantly used in cloud and private setups, praised for its simplicity and high-rated technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure API Management is considered expensive but provides value for large-scale needs with a flexible pay-as-you-go model. Postman is primarily free, with competitive pricing for advanced features, making it more economical and accessible, especially for individual and enterprise users.