Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Neo4j AuraDB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB provides flexible, efficient scalability with global distribution, reducing costs and supporting large-scale, diverse applications.
No sentiment score available
Its scalability deserves a ten out of ten.
In cases where it has to automatically scale up to your maximum, that happens very quickly.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is a scalable, secure, and cost-effective cloud database offering high performance and flexibility for developers.
No sentiment score available
After migrating applications from an SQL database to Azure Cosmos DB, the change in the organization is massive.
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is its ability to handle concurrency and consistency.
While we don't utilize every feature, auto-scaling has been invaluable for optimizing both cost and performance on our platform daily.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.9
Users want better SQL documentation, pricing models, performance, integrations, UI enhancements, and expanded API and developer tools.
No sentiment score available
SQL Server is very portable. You can even install it on your machine. That is the number one thing that is missing in Azure Cosmos DB.
The first one is the ability to assign role-based access control through the Azure portal for accounts to have contributor rights.
Complex cross-partition querying, and BI/analytical tasks often necessitate moving data to other solutions like Fabric and Azure AI Search.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is praised for strong reliability, scalability, and 99.999% uptime despite occasional complexity in configuration.
No sentiment score available
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is highly stable and built for stability and scalability.
The solution is very stable, and I cannot recall a time when Azure Cosmos DB let us down.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.2
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's customer support is praised for responsiveness but needs faster access to knowledgeable specialists.
No sentiment score available
The response was quick.
I would rate customer service and support a nine out of ten.
Our experience with technical support has always been great.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.8
Azure Cosmos DB offers scalable pay-as-you-go pricing, seen as cost-effective yet potentially expensive compared to traditional RDBMS.
No sentiment score available
With so many improvements to the platform and ways to optimize, in our big enterprise deployments, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB tends to be one of the least expensive services even though it gets a lot of use.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Database as a Service (DBaaS) (6th), NoSQL Databases (3rd), Vector Databases (5th)
Neo4j AuraDB
Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Managed NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is 17.3%, down from 19.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Neo4j AuraDB is 5.9%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed NoSQL Databases
 

Featured Reviews

Michael Calvin - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to integrate, has a shallow learning curve, and scales dynamically
Azure Cosmos DB is quick to adopt with a shallow learning curve. The average user can be operational within hours or days, handling small to medium data volumes. However, optimizing for ultra-high throughput scenarios involves a steeper learning curve, requiring substantial knowledge to master Azure Cosmos DB. Nonetheless, most users can leverage it as their operational data store with minimal effort. Our platform boasts several extensive language model features, particularly around summarization capabilities. We use vector searching in Azure Cosmos DB to facilitate the retrieval of an augmented generation model with our LLM implementation. It's a standard RAG implementation using Azure Cosmos DB. Compared to other options, a key advantage of vector indexing in Azure Cosmos DB is the ability to query documents alongside vectors. This pinpoints the precise information required for RAG in our LLM solution, granting us greater flexibility than vector searching in other Azure services. We integrated the vector database with the Azure OpenAI service for our LLM solution. The Azure AI services were simple to integrate with the vector database. There was a slight learning curve, especially as we were on the private preview of vector searching. This led to some hiccups with our existing database configurations, specifically regarding continuous backup. We couldn't enable continuous backup and vector searching simultaneously. However, this was solely due to our participation in the preview, and I'm confident this issue won't persist in the general availability release. Azure Cosmos DB is fantastic for searching large amounts of data when the data is within a single partition. Over the last two weekends, we ingested over 400 gigabytes of data into our Azure Cosmos DB database and saw no change in querying performance compared to when our database was only 20 gigabytes in size. This is impressive and powerful, but the scope is limited to those partition queries. The first benefit we've seen is increased developer productivity. Azure Cosmos DB is an easy database to work with. Its schema-less nature allows us to iterate quickly on our platform, develop new features, and store the associated data in Azure. Developers find it easy to use, eliminating the need for object-relational mapping tools and other overhead. Geographic replication and the ability to scale geographically is another advantage. This is challenging with other databases, even other NoSQL databases, but Azure Cosmos DB makes it easy. Cost optimization is a major benefit as well. We've been able to run our platform at a fraction of the infrastructure cost our customers incur when integrating with us. This allows us to focus resources on feature development and platform building rather than infrastructure maintenance. Azure Cosmos DB helped reduce the total cost of ownership. We don't need DBAs, system administrators, or typical IT staff to run the infrastructure because we can use Azure Cosmos DB as a platform or a software-as-a-service data storage solution. This makes the total cost of ownership significantly lower than any comparable solution using relational databases or other NoSQL solutions like MongoDB. We enable auto-scaling on all of our Azure Cosmos DB resources, which helps us achieve cost optimizations.
Aryan Tiwari - PeerSpot reviewer
Multi-cloud availability, relationship-centric modeling and manages complex data relationships
I've been using it for a few months now, and everything has been fairly positive. Maybe in terms of documentation, they can improve a little bit. Neo4j AuraDB already has a good set of documentation, and the initial setup is easy, but it could be made a bit easier. For me, things are going very well, actually. In terms of AuraDB, the conversations have always been around scalability. So that's where people are majorly concerned: whether it can be used for truly production-grade projects. But Neo4j AuraDB consistently comes up with updates. But potentially, that could be one area where maybe I can see some more improvements.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Retailer
7%
Computer Software Company
27%
Educational Organization
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?
The initial setup is simple and straightforward. You can set up a Cosmos DB in a day, even configuring things like availability zones around the world.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?
Cosmos DB is a managed offering, so its cost is understandably higher. However, the value it provides aligns with its price, especially considering the discounts we receive. By purchasing reserved ...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?
Cosmos DB has a couple of areas for improvement. Firstly, the lack of multi-collection joins is a significant limitation. Secondly, Azure Synapse Link, their data warehousing and synchronization fe...
What is your primary use case for Neo4j AuraDB?
I worked on a project focused on the quality of public menus, using Neo4j AuraDB to connect and create relationships between food items. This allowed us to visualize data in interesting ways and id...
What advice do you have for others considering Neo4j AuraDB?
Neo4j AuraDB is a powerful graph database that enables us to accomplish impressive tasks. Specifically, as a cloud-based service, it eliminates the need for a high-performance computer to use it. S...
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure DocumentDB, MS Azure Cosmos DB
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TomTom, KPMG Australia, Bosch, ASOS, Mercedes Benz, NBA, Zero Friction, Nederlandse Spoorwegen, Kinectify
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Neo4j AuraDB and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.