Top 10 Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

85 reviews
95% willing to recommend

146 followers

Top Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include MongoDB, MongoDB Atlas, and Amazon DynamoDB. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB surpasses its competitors by offering global distribution, multi-model support, and seamless scalability, which ensures low latency and high availability while providing comprehensive SLAs and real-time data access to enhance business operations and efficiency.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

MongoDB

4.1 out of 5

MongoDB

4.1 out of 5

MongoDB offers open-source flexibility, scalability, and ease of use, attracting developers needing JSON storage for semi-structured data. In comparison, Cosmos DB appeals with global distribution, strong Azure integration, and superior scalability, ideal for enterprises requiring reliable availability and robust disaster recovery solutions.

Download Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. MongoDB Report

Pricing

MongoDB offers a simple setup process with lower initial costs, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB often involves higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

MongoDB offers a simple setup process with lower initial costs, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB often involves higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive feature set.

MongoDB Atlas

4.2 out of 5

MongoDB Atlas

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers scalability, diverse data models, and fast performance, making it suitable for businesses needing advanced features and low latency. In comparison, MongoDB Atlas provides flexibility and ease of use, appealing to teams preferring open-source solutions and cost-effectiveness.

Download Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. MongoDB Atlas Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB features a straightforward setup with variable pricing based on throughput and geographical distribution, while MongoDB Atlas offers more predictable costs but may require additional configurations for scalability and resource optimization.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon DynamoDB

4.1 out of 5

Amazon DynamoDB

4.1 out of 5

Amazon DynamoDB excels in swift performance and seamless AWS integration, ideal for unstructured data. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers global distribution and schema-less design, suiting diverse use cases. Buyers may prefer DynamoDB for scalability or Cosmos DB for flexibility and distribution.

Download Amazon DynamoDB vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report

Pricing

Amazon DynamoDB typically involves lower initial setup costs, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB may incur higher setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction in pricing structure between the two platforms.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon Neptune

4.3 out of 5

Amazon Neptune

4.3 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers global distribution and multi-model support, ideal for scalable applications. In comparison, Amazon Neptune excels in managing graph-based data, suitable for complex relationships. Each service attracts tech buyers based on specific application needs and data management preferences.

Download Amazon Neptune vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB typically requires a higher initial setup cost, while Amazon Neptune offers a more cost-effective setup option, highlighting a significant difference in pricing strategy between the two database services.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon DocumentDB

4.2 out of 5

Amazon DocumentDB

4.2 out of 5

Azure Cosmos DB appeals to buyers with its global distribution and multi-model flexibility. In comparison, Amazon DocumentDB attracts those seeking compatibility with MongoDB and efficient AWS integration. Flexibility versus ease of use helps determine the right NoSQL database for specific needs.

Download Amazon DocumentDB vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB features straightforward setup costs, while Amazon DocumentDB offers a competitive pricing structure that might appeal to budget-conscious users. The differences in pricing can influence the initial choice based on budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Cloud Bigtable

4.4 out of 5

Google Cloud Bigtable

4.4 out of 5

Google Cloud Bigtable is valued for seamless integration within Google services, excelling in high-volume, low-latency workloads. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers flexible global distribution and multi-model support, attracting those needing versatile data solutions despite higher costs.

Download Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report

Pricing

Google Cloud Bigtable setup costs are minimal, making it budget-friendly, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Cloud Bigtable setup costs are minimal, making it budget-friendly, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB requires a higher initial investment.

Amazon Timestream

4.5 out of 5

Amazon Timestream

4.5 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB excels in global distribution and diverse data models, appealing to enterprises needing versatility. In comparison, Amazon Timestream specializes in time-series data, offering efficient handling for IoT applications, making it ideal for specialized workloads with cost-effective serverless deployment.

Download Amazon Timestream vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB requires significant initial setup costs, while Amazon Timestream offers a simpler and more cost-effective setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB requires significant initial setup costs, while Amazon Timestream offers a simpler and more cost-effective setup.

Neo4j AuraDB

4.3 out of 5

Neo4j AuraDB

4.3 out of 5

Azure Cosmos DB excels in global distribution and scalability, ideal for high-traffic, flexible applications. In comparison, Neo4j AuraDB specializes in graph-based data models, making it a strong choice for intricate relationship analysis, appealing to those needing focused graph capabilities in data management.

Download Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Neo4j AuraDB Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB requires significant setup costs, while Neo4j AuraDB emphasizes lower initial investment. The differences in setup costs impact the decision for organizations considering initial budget constraints.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud

1 out of 5

Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud

1 out of 5

Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud is noted for its competitive pricing and security, making it suitable for Oracle integrations. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers advanced features and scalability, appealing to those needing global distribution and low latency for diverse applications.

Pricing

Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud has a lower upfront setup cost, whereas Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB features a more comprehensive initial feature set with higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud has a lower upfront setup cost, whereas Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB features a more comprehensive initial feature set with higher initial expenses.

Related categories

Managed NoSQL Databases

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

NoSQL Databases