Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Pinecone comparison

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Read 6 Pinecone reviews

2,084 Views
1,863 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and Pinecone compete in the database solutions category. While Cosmos DB offers extensive scalability and integration within Microsoft's ecosystem, Pinecone holds an advantage with its flexible and budget-friendly features.

Features: Cosmos DB is recognized for its scalability, integration with SQL architecture, and support for various APIs. It effectively manages nested JSON documents and offers a time-to-live feature, which enhances its storage capabilities. Pinecone offers a managed service environment, allowing for seamless performance without extensive maintenance. Its semantic search capabilities and flexibility are impactful for diverse applications.

Room for Improvement: Cosmos DB users seek better API compatibility, improved documentation, and more flexible query capabilities. They face challenges with cost predictions and fine-tuning performance. Pinecone users look for faster search speeds and a simpler onboarding process while desiring support that is accessible for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cosmos DB is widely deployed in public cloud settings, particularly benefiting from Microsoft product integration, although support experiences vary. Pinecone presents both on-premises and public cloud options and provides satisfactory customer support. Cosmos users appreciate a cooperative relationship with engineers, whereas Pinecone could improve user guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Cosmos DB employs a pay-as-you-go model, often seen as costly with a complex pricing structure. It features a beneficial cost-to-ownership ratio owing to scalability. Pinecone, while also considered expensive, offers a simpler and more budget-friendly pricing model compared to other vector databases, making it an appealing choice for economical solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Pinecone Report (Updated: March 2025).

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Pinecone

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Ranking in Vector Databases

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS) (6th), NoSQL Databases (3rd), Managed NoSQL Databases (1st)

Pinecone

Ranking in Vector Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Vector Databases category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is 2.5%. The mindshare of Pinecone is 7.7%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vector Databases

Featured Reviews

MichaelJohn

Director | Data & AI at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Very efficient for application-facing scenarios

There are several areas for improvement. Firstly, having a local development emulator or simulator for Azure Cosmos DB would be beneficial. It would be very handy to have a Docker container that developers can use locally. Although, I know there is a free tier and so on and so forth, having a local environment would be nice. For example, SQL Server is very portable. You can even install it on your machine. That is the number one thing that is missing in Azure Cosmos DB. The second improvement area is the IDE of choice. That means how you interact with Azure Cosmos DB. For example, with SQL Server, you have SQL Server Management Studio. I know there is a little bit of support for Azure Cosmos DB in Azure Data Studio, but it is not heavily advertised or it does not feel like first-class citizen support. Developer experience or developer tooling is missing in terms of interacting with the database. Better developer tools or an IDE for interacting with Azure Cosmos DB would enhance the developer experience. Lastly, there is some mixed messaging about what Azure Cosmos DB is, given its multiple APIs. There are so many Azure Cosmos DB APIs available. There is NoSQL. There are MongoDB, Gremlin, and others. There is still some mixed messaging for others who are new to Azure Cosmos DB about what Azure Cosmos DB is. Is this like MongoDB, but then there is also MongoDB in Azure Cosmos DB? I know it well, and I know that the default one is just NoSQL, but others I have interacted with over the last ten years or so get confused.

Read full review

Aakash Kushwaha

SDE at Alphablocks

Helps retrieve data, relatively cheaper, and provides useful documentation

Suppose I want to delete a vector from Pinecone or a multi-vector from a single document. Pinecone does not provide feedback on whether a document is deleted or not. In SQL and NoSQL databases, if we delete something, we get a response that it is deleted. The tool does not confirm whether a file is deleted or not. I have raised the issue with support. If we have 10,000 vectors in our index and do not use a metadata tag, it will take one to three seconds to complete a search. When I try to search using a metadata tag, the speed is still the same. The search speed must be much faster because I specify which vectors I need the data from.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It works reasonably fast. You can retain the original format of the document as received by the third-party system."

"The high speed of Azure Cosmos DB compared to other competitors is remarkable."

"One of the nice features is the ability to auto-scale"

"The autoscale feature is the most useful for us."

"The global synchronization feature of Azure Cosmos DB stands out as the most valuable for me."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is scalable with multiple master files."

"The solution is used because we get faster response times with large data sets than with SQL. It's essential for us because we have half a billion rows, and we need to return them quickly."

"We love the ability to land data with Cosmos DB easily. Cosmos is native to Azure, so everything works seamlessly with it. You need good data to have good AI, and Cosmos makes it easy to land the data."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB pros

"We chose Pinecone because it covers most of the use cases."

"The semantic search capability is very good."

"The most valuable feature of Pinecone is its managed service aspect. There are many vector databases available, but Pinecone stands out in the market. It is very flexible, allowing us to input any kind of data dimensions into the platform. This makes it easy to use for both technical and non-technical users."

"The most valuable features of the solution are similarity search and maximal marginal relevance search for retrieval purposes."

"The product's setup phase was easy."

"The best thing about Pinecone is its private local host feature. It displays all the maintenance parameters and lets us view the data sent to the database. We can also see the status of the CD and which application it corresponds to."

Cons

"The customer service is lacking. We have a premier support agreement, but support is hit and miss."

"I don't think Cosmos DB has improved our organization. People are using it, but I'm not sure it's the best solution. For one, it's costly. Also, there are other issues with it. You cannot get all the records simultaneously. You can only get it in chunks of 1,500 maximum."

"One of our biggest pain points is the backup and restore functionality needs improvement."

"The integration of the on-premise solution with the cloud can be difficult sometimes."

"From about half a billion rows, we're returning maybe 20,000 in two or three minutes. We don't know why, but we are working with Microsoft and a third party to figure that out."

"Because there is no local way of doing things, Azure Cosmos DB will always be considered expensive."

"Better documentation on how to integrate with other components would be helpful because I was struggling with this."

"In that scenario, two things can be improved."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB cons

"Onboarding could be better and smoother."

"The tool does not confirm whether a file is deleted or not."

"Pinecone can be made more budget-friendly."

"I want to suggest that Pinecone requires a login and API key, but I would prefer not to have a login system and to use the environment directly."

"The product fails to offer a serverless type of storage capacity."

"For testing purposes, the product should offer support locally as it is one area where the tool has shortcomings."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for Cosmos DB has improved, particularly with the new pricing for Autoscale."

"Cosmos DB is expensive, and the RU-based pricing model is confusing. Although they have a serverless layer, there are deficiencies in what I can define and assign to a database. Estimating infrastructure needs is not straightforward, making it challenging to manage costs."

"Our experience with the pricing and setup cost is that it aligns with what we expect based on the pricing we see. However, I would absolutely like it to be less if possible."

"Cosmos DB is cost-effective when starting but requires careful management."

"The pricing and licensing model was initially difficult to understand, but as soon as I learned what was going on and how it was priced, it was pretty easy."

"Pricing is one of the solution's main features because it is based on usage, scales automatically, and is not too costly."

"The price of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB could be a bit lower."

"Its pricing structure is quite flexible."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB pricing and cost advice

"The solution is relatively cheaper than other vector DBs in the market."

"I think Pinecone is cheaper to use than other options I've explored. However, I also remember that they offer a paid version."

"I have experience with the tool's free version."

"Pinecone is not cheap; it's actually quite expensive. We find that using Pinecone can raise our budget significantly. On the other hand, using open-source options is more budget-friendly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Legal Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

The initial setup is simple and straightforward. You can set up a Cosmos DB in a day, even configuring things like availability zones around the world.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

Its pricing is not bad. It is good. We have a contract with Microsoft to use their technology. In my opinion, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is a good option for the total cost of ownership.

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

I think Cosmos DB enhanced the benefits of NoSQL databases, offering query flexibility, partition management, and backup and restore options. These aspects are crucial, and perhaps improving the co...

What do you like most about Pinecone?

We chose Pinecone because it covers most of the use cases.

What needs improvement with Pinecone?

I want to suggest that Pinecone requires a login and API key, but I would prefer not to have a login system and to use the environment directly.

What is your primary use case for Pinecone?

I've used Pinecone to streamline token generation for my chatbot's functionality. Specifically, I used it for the OpenNeeam Building.

Chroma vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon Neptune vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 6% of the time

Neo4j AuraDB vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 5% of the time

Faiss vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Competitors

OpenSearch vs Pinecone

Compared 37% of the time

LanceDB vs Pinecone

Compared 12% of the time

Elastic Search vs Pinecone

Compared 10% of the time

Supabase Vector vs Pinecone

Compared 7% of the time

Redis vs Pinecone

Compared 7% of the time

More Pinecone Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Download Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB product report

Download Pinecone product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure DocumentDB, MS Azure Cosmos DB

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is a globally distributed, multi-model database service providing scalability, user-friendliness, and seamless integration, suitable for managing large volumes of structured and unstructured data across diverse applications.

Azure Cosmos DB is renowned for its scalability, stability, and ease of integration, offering robust support for multiple data models and APIs. Its capacity for handling unstructured data efficiently and providing real-time analytics makes it ideal for applications requiring high performance and global distribution. With features like automatic failover and integration with Microsoft products, users benefit from cost optimization and secure data handling. Enhancement opportunities include simplifying queries, improving documentation, and expanding backup and analytics functionalities.

What are the most important features of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

Scalability and Autoscaling: Efficiently handles growing data and user demands.
Multi-Model Support: Adapts to different data models seamlessly.
Global Distribution: Provides low-latency access across multiple regions.
Automatic Failover: Ensures high availability and reliability.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Offers seamless connectivity with Azure services.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB reviews?

Performance and Speed: Exceptionally fast processing for real-time data analytics.
Cost Optimization: Tools for managing expenses effectively.
Secure Data Handling: Implements strong data security measures.
Flexible Data Ingestion: Supports diverse data ingestion methods.

Azure Cosmos DB is frequently used in sectors like web, mobile, IoT, and analytics. It supports applications as a key-value store, processes real-time data, and enables global scalability with low-latency access. Its big data management capabilities and integration with Azure services enhance its utility across industries.

Microsoft

Pinecone is a powerful tool for efficiently storing and retrieving vector embeddings. It is highly praised for its scalability, speed, and ease of integration with existing workflows.

Users find it particularly useful for similarity search, recommendation systems, and natural language processing.

Its efficient search capabilities, seamless integration with existing systems, and ability to handle large-scale datasets make it a valuable tool for data analysis and retrieval.

Sample Customers

TomTom, KPMG Australia, Bosch, ASOS, Mercedes Benz, NBA, Zero Friction, Nederlandse Spoorwegen, Kinectify

1. Airbnb 2. DoorDash 3. Instacart 4. Lyft 5. Pinterest 6. Reddit 7. Slack 8. Snapchat 9. Spotify 10. TikTok 11. Twitter 12. Uber 13. Zoom 14. Adobe 15. Amazon 16. Apple 17. Facebook 18. Google 19. IBM 20. Microsoft 21. Netflix 22. Salesforce 23. Shopify 24. Square 25. Tesla 26. TikTok 27. Twitch 28. Uber Eats 29. WhatsApp 30. Yelp 31. Zillow 32. Zynga

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Pinecone