Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Pinecone comparison

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Read 6 Pinecone reviews

1,823 Views
1,653 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and Pinecone compete in the database solutions category. While Cosmos DB offers extensive scalability and integration within Microsoft's ecosystem, Pinecone holds an advantage with its flexible and budget-friendly features.

Features: Cosmos DB is recognized for its scalability, integration with SQL architecture, and support for various APIs. It effectively manages nested JSON documents and offers a time-to-live feature, which enhances its storage capabilities. Pinecone offers a managed service environment, allowing for seamless performance without extensive maintenance. Its semantic search capabilities and flexibility are impactful for diverse applications.

Room for Improvement: Cosmos DB users seek better API compatibility, improved documentation, and more flexible query capabilities. They face challenges with cost predictions and fine-tuning performance. Pinecone users look for faster search speeds and a simpler onboarding process while desiring support that is accessible for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cosmos DB is widely deployed in public cloud settings, particularly benefiting from Microsoft product integration, although support experiences vary. Pinecone presents both on-premises and public cloud options and provides satisfactory customer support. Cosmos users appreciate a cooperative relationship with engineers, whereas Pinecone could improve user guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Cosmos DB employs a pay-as-you-go model, often seen as costly with a complex pricing structure. It features a beneficial cost-to-ownership ratio owing to scalability. Pinecone, while also considered expensive, offers a simpler and more budget-friendly pricing model compared to other vector databases, making it an appealing choice for economical solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Pinecone Report (Updated: January 2025).

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Pinecone

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Ranking in Vector Databases

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS) (6th), NoSQL Databases (3rd), Managed NoSQL Databases (1st)

Pinecone

Ranking in Vector Databases

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Vector Databases category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is 1.6%. The mindshare of Pinecone is 8.1%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vector Databases

Featured Reviews

MichaelJohn

Director | Data & AI at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Very efficient for application-facing scenarios

There are several areas for improvement. Firstly, having a local development emulator or simulator for Azure Cosmos DB would be beneficial. It would be very handy to have a Docker container that developers can use locally. Although, I know there is a free tier and so on and so forth, having a local environment would be nice. For example, SQL Server is very portable. You can even install it on your machine. That is the number one thing that is missing in Azure Cosmos DB. The second improvement area is the IDE of choice. That means how you interact with Azure Cosmos DB. For example, with SQL Server, you have SQL Server Management Studio. I know there is a little bit of support for Azure Cosmos DB in Azure Data Studio, but it is not heavily advertised or it does not feel like first-class citizen support. Developer experience or developer tooling is missing in terms of interacting with the database. Better developer tools or an IDE for interacting with Azure Cosmos DB would enhance the developer experience. Lastly, there is some mixed messaging about what Azure Cosmos DB is, given its multiple APIs. There are so many Azure Cosmos DB APIs available. There is NoSQL. There are MongoDB, Gremlin, and others. There is still some mixed messaging for others who are new to Azure Cosmos DB about what Azure Cosmos DB is. Is this like MongoDB, but then there is also MongoDB in Azure Cosmos DB? I know it well, and I know that the default one is just NoSQL, but others I have interacted with over the last ten years or so get confused.

Read full review

Aakash Kushwaha

SDE at Alphablocks

Helps retrieve data, relatively cheaper, and provides useful documentation

Suppose I want to delete a vector from Pinecone or a multi-vector from a single document. Pinecone does not provide feedback on whether a document is deleted or not. In SQL and NoSQL databases, if we delete something, we get a response that it is deleted. The tool does not confirm whether a file is deleted or not. I have raised the issue with support. If we have 10,000 vectors in our index and do not use a metadata tag, it will take one to three seconds to complete a search. When I try to search using a metadata tag, the speed is still the same. The search speed must be much faster because I specify which vectors I need the data from.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has a lot of useful features that are there and ready to use, it's also very easy to use."

"We achieved a strong return on investment."

"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB simplifies the process of saving and retrieving data."

"It is a NoSQL database."

"The connectors, such as the MongoDB connector and the integration with SQL, are incredibly valuable."

"The features most valuable to us in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB are the auto scale and change feed. These features allow us to do some operations that are not possible with SQL Server."

"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is very easy to use."

"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is very fast. Data retrieval and data storage are very quick."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB pros

"The product's setup phase was easy."

"The semantic search capability is very good."

"The most valuable feature of Pinecone is its managed service aspect. There are many vector databases available, but Pinecone stands out in the market. It is very flexible, allowing us to input any kind of data dimensions into the platform. This makes it easy to use for both technical and non-technical users."

"The most valuable features of the solution are similarity search and maximal marginal relevance search for retrieval purposes."

"We chose Pinecone because it covers most of the use cases."

"The best thing about Pinecone is its private local host feature. It displays all the maintenance parameters and lets us view the data sent to the database. We can also see the status of the CD and which application it corresponds to."

Cons

"One of our biggest pain points is the backup and restore functionality needs improvement. They've gotten a little better in this area. SQL Server's long-term retention is amazing, and you can restore data from years ago. You need to open a support Microsoft ticket to restore your Cosmos DB backup, and it comes in on a different Cosmos account. It's just kind of a headache to restore data."

"Currently, I have no suggestions for enhancement or new implementations in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB. However, the cost can sometimes be high, especially during cross-partition queries with large data amounts."

"The main area of improvement is the cost, as the expense is high. Also, when writing processes into Cosmos, sometimes the threshold is met, which can be a problem if developers have not written the code properly, limiting calls to five thousand. These aspects need addressing."

"A minor improvement would be enabling batch operations through the UI. Currently, to delete all documents in a collection, we must use an API, which some of my team finds inconvenient for admin tasks."

"The auto-scaling feature adjusts hourly. We have many processes that write stuff in batches, so we must ensure that the load is spread evenly throughout the hour. It would be much easier if it were done by the minute. I'm looking forward to the vector database search that they are adding. It's a pretty cool new feature."

"It should offer a simple user interface for querying Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB."

"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB can be improved by providing more fine-grained control over certain aspects, such as connections and threads. There could be more control over how many connections are made."

"The integration of the on-premise solution with the cloud can be difficult sometimes."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB cons

"For testing purposes, the product should offer support locally as it is one area where the tool has shortcomings."

"Onboarding could be better and smoother."

"The product fails to offer a serverless type of storage capacity."

"The tool does not confirm whether a file is deleted or not."

"I want to suggest that Pinecone requires a login and API key, but I would prefer not to have a login system and to use the environment directly."

"Pinecone can be made more budget-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure Cosmos DB's pricing is competitive, though there is a need for more personalized pricing models to accommodate small applications without incurring high charges. A suggestion is to implement dynamically adjustable pricing that accounts for various user needs."

"I would rate Cosmos DB's cost at seven out of ten, with ten being the highest."

"The RU's use case determines our license fees."

"The pricing for Cosmos DB has improved, particularly with the new pricing for Autoscale."

"Cosmos DB gave us three accounts for $400. We pay according to the usage."

"From a startup point of view, it appears to be expensive. If I were to create my startup, it would not have the pricing appeal compared to the competition, such as Supabase. All those other databases are well-advertised by communities. I know there is a free tier with Azure Cosmos DB. It is just not well advertised."

"The pricing for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is good. Initially, it seemed like an expensive way to manage a NoSQL data store, but so many improvements that have been made to the platform have made it cost-effective."

"Its pricing structure is quite flexible."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB pricing and cost advice

"Pinecone is not cheap; it's actually quite expensive. We find that using Pinecone can raise our budget significantly. On the other hand, using open-source options is more budget-friendly."

"I have experience with the tool's free version."

"I think Pinecone is cheaper to use than other options I've explored. However, I also remember that they offer a paid version."

"The solution is relatively cheaper than other vector DBs in the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Legal Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

The initial setup is simple and straightforward. You can set up a Cosmos DB in a day, even configuring things like availability zones around the world.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

Azure Cosmos DB is generally a costly resource compared to other Azure resources. It comes with a high cost. We have reserved one thousand RUs. Free usage is also limited.

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

Overall, it is a good resource. I am not aware of the background, but it seems to currently support only JSON documents. They could expand their scope to support other types of data, such as XML or...

What do you like most about Pinecone?

We chose Pinecone because it covers most of the use cases.

What needs improvement with Pinecone?

I want to suggest that Pinecone requires a login and API key, but I would prefer not to have a login system and to use the environment directly.

What is your primary use case for Pinecone?

I've used Pinecone to streamline token generation for my chatbot's functionality. Specifically, I used it for the OpenNeeam Building.

Chroma vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon Neptune vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon DocumentDB vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 6% of the time

Neo4j AuraDB vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Competitors

OpenSearch vs Pinecone

Compared 38% of the time

Elastic Search vs Pinecone

Compared 11% of the time

LanceDB vs Pinecone

Compared 11% of the time

Faiss vs Pinecone

Compared 10% of the time

SingleStore vs Pinecone

Compared 2% of the time

More Pinecone Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

February 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB product report

Download Pinecone product report

February 2025

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure DocumentDB, MS Azure Cosmos DB

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is a globally distributed, multi-model database service providing scalability, user-friendliness, and seamless integration, suitable for managing large volumes of structured and unstructured data across diverse applications.

Azure Cosmos DB is renowned for its scalability, stability, and ease of integration, offering robust support for multiple data models and APIs. Its capacity for handling unstructured data efficiently and providing real-time analytics makes it ideal for applications requiring high performance and global distribution. With features like automatic failover and integration with Microsoft products, users benefit from cost optimization and secure data handling. Enhancement opportunities include simplifying queries, improving documentation, and expanding backup and analytics functionalities.

What are the most important features of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

Scalability and Autoscaling: Efficiently handles growing data and user demands.
Multi-Model Support: Adapts to different data models seamlessly.
Global Distribution: Provides low-latency access across multiple regions.
Automatic Failover: Ensures high availability and reliability.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Offers seamless connectivity with Azure services.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB reviews?

Performance and Speed: Exceptionally fast processing for real-time data analytics.
Cost Optimization: Tools for managing expenses effectively.
Secure Data Handling: Implements strong data security measures.
Flexible Data Ingestion: Supports diverse data ingestion methods.

Azure Cosmos DB is frequently used in sectors like web, mobile, IoT, and analytics. It supports applications as a key-value store, processes real-time data, and enables global scalability with low-latency access. Its big data management capabilities and integration with Azure services enhance its utility across industries.

Microsoft

Pinecone is a powerful tool for efficiently storing and retrieving vector embeddings. It is highly praised for its scalability, speed, and ease of integration with existing workflows.

Users find it particularly useful for similarity search, recommendation systems, and natural language processing.

Its efficient search capabilities, seamless integration with existing systems, and ability to handle large-scale datasets make it a valuable tool for data analysis and retrieval.

Sample Customers

TomTom, KPMG Australia, Bosch, ASOS, Mercedes Benz, NBA, Zero Friction, Nederlandse Spoorwegen, Kinectify

1. Airbnb 2. DoorDash 3. Instacart 4. Lyft 5. Pinterest 6. Reddit 7. Slack 8. Snapchat 9. Spotify 10. TikTok 11. Twitter 12. Uber 13. Zoom 14. Adobe 15. Amazon 16. Apple 17. Facebook 18. Google 19. IBM 20. Microsoft 21. Netflix 22. Salesforce 23. Shopify 24. Square 25. Tesla 26. TikTok 27. Twitch 28. Uber Eats 29. WhatsApp 30. Yelp 31. Zillow 32. Zynga