Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Cloud Software Appliance comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #24. Microsoft holds a 12.5% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Read 47 Microsoft Azure File Storage reviews

3,748 Views
3,103 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Oracle Cloud Software Appli...

51 Views
34 Comparison Views

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Oracle Cloud Software Appli...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Cloud Software Appliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google, Microsoft and others in Public Cloud Storage Services.

To learn more, read our detailed Public Cloud Storage Services Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Cloud Software Appli...

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

24th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 12.5%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Software Appliance is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

PrashanthR

Lead Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Seamlessly streamlines document processing with advanced file storage and OCR integration

We need to store data over there. We process documents through Kofax Time is a major benefit, as well as ease of processing. With configuration, it happens quite easily, and we can finish tasks early. File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service. This enhances the processing…

Read full review

Use Oracle Cloud Software Appliance?

Share your opinion

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The product is a reliable cloud solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The price is almost the same as the competition. I would rate it three or three and a half out of ten on the pricing scale.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 47% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 18% of the time

Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage

December 2024

Download Microsoft Azure File Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

December 2024

Download Oracle Cloud Software Appliance product report

Also Known As

MS Azure File Storage

No data available

Learn More

Microsoft

Oracle

Overview

Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

Key scenarios:

Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
Integrate modern applications with File storage
Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

Well-Known Interface - connect applications to cloud storage using NFS – a widely used data protocol.

User Friendly - intuitive data access for you and your applications as well.

POSIX Compliant - access data with similar experience across various flavors of Unix/Linux NFS clients.

Automatic Translation - interface with data as files while stored as objects in the cloud.

Sample Customers

Talon, Camden

Brinks

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

December 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google, Microsoft and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.