Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security comparison

Microsoft and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the IoT Security category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Microsoft holds a 9.1% mindshare in IS, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Defender for IoT
Read 2 Microsoft Defender for IoT reviews
  • 547 Views
  • 432 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Read 9 Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reviews
  • 1,503 Views
  • 296 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender for IoT and Palo Alto Networks IoT Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis and others in IoT Security.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IoT Security Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
IoT Security
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender for IoT
Ranking in IoT Security
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Operational Technology (OT) Security (6th), Microsoft Security Suite (32nd)
Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Ranking in IoT Security
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender for IoT is 9.1%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 7.7%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

William Tuleja - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration with existing tools boosts management efficiency
The only improvement I see is that some detection explanations are vaguely provided by Microsoft, resulting in generic IoT detections that alert me to an issue yet don't specify what's wrong. Often, it just links back to a generic KB article without additional information. When it happens, it requires extra detective work. This issue doesn't occur often but can be annoying.
Read full review
Alex De Miranda - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs
The product could improve by offering more comprehensive network visibility and expanding beyond IoT-specific activities to provide a holistic view of the entire network. This would allow administrators to better contextualize IoT device behaviour within overall network traffic. Additionally, while the next-generation firewall's role as a sensor is beneficial, addressing its limitations in handling all security layers would enhance its effectiveness and reliability for broader security needs. In future releases, incorporating advanced analytics for proactive threat detection, automated response mechanisms for IoT-related incidents, and improved scalability for managing diverse and growing IoT ecosystems would significantly enhance the product. Enhanced integration with third-party platforms and tools could also improve interoperability and streamline security management across complex environments. It would be beneficial if Palo Alto IoT Security could integrate with Let's Encrypt for free SSL certificates.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Mainly, it is manageable and integrates with other Microsoft products, which is crucial for me."
"It is manageable and integrates with other Microsoft products, which is crucial for me."
"I find Microsoft Defender very effective in vulnerability management and it provides good attack reduction, making it a next-generation protection solution."
"I believe it is best suited for cloud services and is unmatched by other cloud security solutions."
"The key strength of Palo Alto firewalls lies in their application-based approach, offering a much finer level of control compared to traditional firewalls."
"I like the threat information, and we can share the logging data with Cortex Data Lake."
"From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements."
"I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage."
"Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency."
"I like the Cortex Data Lake integration with security automation."
"Palo Alto is valued for its GlobalProtect feature, which offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs."
"It is simple to use. We just need to enable features and then configure IoT policies."
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security pros
 

Cons

"The only improvement I see is that some detection explanations are vaguely provided by Microsoft, resulting in generic IoT detections that alert me to an issue yet don't specify what's wrong."
"The only improvement I see is that some detection explanations are vaguely provided by Microsoft, resulting in generic IoT detections that alert me to an issue yet don't specify what's wrong."
"The primary area that needs improvement is compatibility with the latest IoT technologies."
"Customer service and support from Microsoft are costly. The execution by engineers is expensive, and the service is neither free nor toll-free, making it less accessible for customers."
"Palo Alto Networks IoT Security's reporting capabilities are less comprehensive and robust than those provided by Cisco."
"The cost is still high and licensing is still complex."
"More application signatures are required."
"There can be more automation in terms of security and detection. It is already good."
"It would be beneficial if Palo Alto IoT Security could integrate with Let's Encrypt for free SSL certificates."
"Essentially, this solution focuses on data analysis and cannot perform any physical actions."
"It would be beneficial to have a more centralized and user-friendly platform that could consolidate all the necessary information, which proved challenging during the initial POC phase."
"While not overly complex, its usability could be enhanced, making it a more intuitive experience for everyone."
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is a bit high."
"The successful migration trend suggests that Palo Alto provides a superior cost-benefit ratio for firewall solutions."
"The initial investment is substantial, but the renewal costs make it financially unsustainable."
"While Palo Alto Networks IoT Security might cost more than some competitors, its features and effectiveness justify the price tag."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Legal Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender for IoT?
The solution is relatively expensive with licensing being based on each device. The cost per license might not be affordable for every organization, and I would rate it around six out of ten on a s...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender for IoT?
The primary area that needs improvement is compatibility with the latest IoT technologies. Microsoft needs flexibility to ensure good compatibility with new IoT solutions, which frequently introduc...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Defender for IoT?
My primary use case for Microsoft Defender for IoT is security. It helps with vulnerability management and provides significant attack reduction. It functions as a next-generation protection soluti...
See all answers
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
Improvement areas include enhancing integration capabilities and making policy creation less cumbersome. The process involves navigating multiple windows, which could be streamlined. Palo Alto Netw...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
We are an insurance-based company, and we had some regulatory requirements that needed to be fulfilled. We've used Palo Alto primarily for our network security needs. It was part of our infrastruct...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Claroty Platform vs Microsoft Defender for IoT Logo
Claroty Platform vs Microsoft Defender for IoT
Compared 32% of the time
Nozomi Networks vs Microsoft Defender for IoT Logo
Nozomi Networks vs Microsoft Defender for IoT
Compared 28% of the time
Tenable OT Security vs Microsoft Defender for IoT Logo
Tenable OT Security vs Microsoft Defender for IoT
Compared 8% of the time
Dragos vs Microsoft Defender for IoT Logo
Dragos vs Microsoft Defender for IoT
Compared 8% of the time
More Microsoft Defender for IoT Competitors
Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 63% of the time
Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 20% of the time
Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 9% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IoT Security
December 2024
Microsoft Defender for IoT reportDownload Microsoft Defender for IoT product report
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
December 2024
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reportDownload Palo Alto Networks IoT Security product report
 

Also Known As

Azure Defender for IoT
No data available
 

Learn More

Microsoft
Palo Alto Networks
 

Overview

Microsoft Defender for IoT is a specialized asset discovery, vulnerability management, and threat monitoring solution for IoT/OT environments. Defender for IoT is an open system that also works with tools such as Splunk, IBM QRadar, and ServiceNow.

Introducing comprehensive IoT Security solutions tailored for enterprises, healthcare, and industrial operations. Safeguard every device, visible or unseen, with Zero Trust security protocols, ensuring protection against known and unknown threats. With rapid 15X faster deployment times, Enterprise IoT Security, Medical IoT Security, and Industrial OT Security streamline operations, allowing teams to prioritize security over setup. Seamlessly integrate with Palo Alto Networks ML-Powered NGFWs or Prisma Access for swift implementation, making your infrastructure IoT-aware within minutes. Eliminate blind spots across existing IT and security solutions with playbook-driven, built-in integrations, and simplify cloud delivery for deployment across any architecture without the need for multiple sensors or network redesign. Protect your assets and ensure uninterrupted operations with our comprehensive IoT security solutions.

Buyer's Guide
IoT Security
December 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis and others in IoT Security. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.