No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security comparison

Nozomi and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the IoT Security category. Nozomi is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Nozomi holds a 15.4% mindshare in IS, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Nozomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
Nozomi Networks
Read 10 Nozomi Networks reviews
  • 6,592 Views
  • 1,846 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Read 11 Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reviews
  • 1,581 Views
  • 1,581 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Nozomi Networks and Palo Alto Networks IoT Security are competitors in the IoT security category, each with unique advantages. Nozomi Networks has favorable pricing and support, while Palo Alto Networks offers superior features that make it a better investment.

Features: Nozomi Networks focuses on network visibility and threat detection, including advanced network monitoring and asset management. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security offers advanced threat prevention, seamless integration with its other products, and enhanced analytics with machine learning capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Nozomi Networks could improve by enhancing analytics and integration capabilities, expanding machine learning features, and refining user interface aesthetics. Palo Alto Networks might work on simplifying deployment processes, reducing complexity in feature configuration, and pricing adjustments for broader market reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nozomi Networks provides an easy deployment process with user-friendly guidance and responsive customer service. Palo Alto Networks, though complex in setup, offers detailed deployment strategies and strong technical support for custom solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Nozomi Networks is seen as cost-effective with high ROI due to lower initial setup costs. Palo Alto Networks, despite a higher upfront cost, provides substantial ROI through long-term security benefits and reduced operational risks, justifying its pricing as a strategic investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nozomi Networks
Ranking in IoT Security
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)
Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Ranking in IoT Security
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 15.4%, down from 31.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 6.9%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks15.4%
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security6.9%
Other77.7%
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Apurva Nigam - PeerSpot reviewer
Apurva Nigam
Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint
Comprehensive dashboards have enabled detailed asset visibility and proactive risk mitigation
On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Networks does not provide that data, so I have to go to the query section. The AI is currently useful for writing queries in English that are converted into their coding language for queries. Sometimes it provides the correct data, and sometimes it does not understand the request. From my attempts, I would say 50 percent of the time it has given me the proper data, and 50 percent of the time it might need improvement. Every day or week, new threat intelligence and AI upgrades are being released for Vantage, and all those upgrades are being implemented. Things are getting better, but I believe there are areas of improvement.
Read full review
reviewer2774463 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2774463
Manager ERP (Insurance) at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Have used it to manage device updates remotely and now see potential for improved centralized control
One of the favorite features is that they can plug in a device and update it without being on the network, so you can perform an offline update. If all the IoT devices in the field can provide a single pane of glass and management through that platform in a controlled fashion, that would be really beneficial.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."
"This is a good product and I definitely recommend it."
"Nozomi Networks is an easy-to-use and powerful tool."
"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."
"It brings visibility into the OT environment because most of the enterprises only have methods to check their IT environment."
"It has impacted security operations in a better way."
"The tool's visibility is good. We can see the traffic flow."
"The network visualization feature of Nozomi impacts security operations positively."
More Nozomi Networks pros
"Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency."
"I like the threat information, and we can share the logging data with Cortex Data Lake."
"This solution has been most valuable for establishing a VPN and implementing allow/deny rules. It has also enabled us to create security policies. It is an easy solution to customise when it comes to creating templates and pulling reports."
"Palo Alto is valued for its GlobalProtect feature, which offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs."
"I like the Cortex Data Lake integration with security automation."
"Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency."
"I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage."
"This solution has been most valuable for establishing a VPN and implementing allow/deny rules."
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security pros
 

Cons

"On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved."
"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."
"Creating custom queries is time-consuming."
"I would like more customizable options for configurations."
"I believe there is room for improvement regarding on-premises AI."
"We have faced downtimes, crashes, or performance issues with certain implementations."
"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."
"Nozomi Networks currently offers add-ons, such as ARP agents, that can be installed on machines to expand the information we receive from sensors. However, these are part of a licensing structure, which can be costly."
More Nozomi Networks cons
"The cost is still high and licensing is still complex."
"I had to call the support because there were some devices that were not showing up."
"The support is in line with Palo Alto Networks services for other products but needs improvement."
"There can be more automation in terms of security and detection. It is already good."
"More application signatures are required."
"The cost is still high and licensing is still complex."
"While not overly complex, its usability could be enhanced, making it a more intuitive experience for everyone."
"The reporting for this solution could be improved. The logs we receive are only saved for one week. We would like to have the database timeframe increased to a month or two for historical reporting as well as increased storage capabilities to support this data and reporting."
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."
"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."
"The pricing for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is a bit high."
"The initial investment is substantial, but the renewal costs make it financially unsustainable."
"The successful migration trend suggests that Palo Alto provides a superior cost-benefit ratio for firewall solutions."
"While Palo Alto Networks IoT Security might cost more than some competitors, its features and effectiveness justify the price tag."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Performing Arts
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
7%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks is priced moderately. Its cost is not too expensive, but it is not low either.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?
I would like to see improvements in Nozomi Networks, probably more AI-based integration and better native integration with SOC and SOAR platforms. I would like to see specific features included in ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?
We use Nozomi Networks as an intrusion detection system for OT deployments, automation systems, and IoT systems such as medical equipment to protect medical systems and smart meters. We detect any ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
One thing I communicated to them is that they need to provide a managed update for their IoT devices.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
I use it for one of my customers, and my role is to help my customer with the solution. They use it for their IoT devices in the field, and they have a lot of sensors out there for their heating eq...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
The pricing is not that bad. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Claroty Platform vs Nozomi Networks Logo
Claroty Platform vs Nozomi Networks
Compared 28% of the time
Dragos vs Nozomi Networks Logo
Dragos vs Nozomi Networks
Compared 14% of the time
Tenable OT Security vs Nozomi Networks Logo
Tenable OT Security vs Nozomi Networks
Compared 9% of the time
Armis vs Nozomi Networks Logo
Armis vs Nozomi Networks
Compared 8% of the time
Armis Centrix for OT/IoT Security vs Nozomi Networks Logo
Armis Centrix for OT/IoT Security vs Nozomi Networks
Compared 2% of the time
More Nozomi Networks Competitors
Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 30% of the time
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 16% of the time
Phosphorus Cybersecurity vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Phosphorus Cybersecurity vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 15% of the time
Azure Sphere vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Azure Sphere vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 12% of the time
Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 7% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IoT Security
March 2026
Nozomi Networks reportDownload Nozomi Networks product report
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
March 2026
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reportDownload Palo Alto Networks IoT Security product report
 

Also Known As

SCADAguardian
No data available
 

Overview

Nozomi Networks enhances ICS and OT cybersecurity through threat detection, monitoring, and comprehensive asset management. Users value its real-time anomaly detection, advanced threat detection via machine learning, and intuitive interface, which streamline workflows and boost efficiency, ensuring compliance and robust network security.

Nozomi

Introducing comprehensive IoT Security solutions tailored for enterprises, healthcare, and industrial operations. Safeguard every device, visible or unseen, with Zero Trust security protocols, ensuring protection against known and unknown threats. With rapid 15X faster deployment times, Enterprise IoT Security, Medical IoT Security, and Industrial OT Security streamline operations, allowing teams to prioritize security over setup. Seamlessly integrate with Palo Alto Networks ML-Powered NGFWs or Prisma Access for swift implementation, making your infrastructure IoT-aware within minutes. Eliminate blind spots across existing IT and security solutions with playbook-driven, built-in integrations, and simplify cloud delivery for deployment across any architecture without the need for multiple sensors or network redesign. Protect your assets and ensure uninterrupted operations with our comprehensive IoT security solutions.

Palo Alto Networks
 

Sample Customers

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
March 2026
Free Report: Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security report.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.