Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Nozomi Networks is scalable for large enterprises, efficiently managing assets and extending capabilities to meet diverse business needs.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.7
Nozomi Networks excels in security, integration, and network visualization, making it ideal for OT and IoT environments.
No sentiment score available
The network visualization feature of Nozomi impacts security operations positively.
The real-time monitoring capabilities have improved our security posture.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Nozomi Networks should enhance PLC support, integration library, pricing, and offer customizable configurations with improved video presentations for proof of concept.
No sentiment score available
I would like more customizable options for configurations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Nozomi Networks is highly rated for stability, scalability, and device visibility, with minimal support needs, especially in Italy.
No sentiment score available
The product is stable and doesn’t usually require frequent technical support interaction.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Nozomi Networks' customer support is praised for responsiveness and proactivity, with room for improvement noted by some users.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Nozomi Networks offers mid-range, cost-effective pricing with monthly options, balancing affordability and value better than Claroty.
No sentiment score available
It's not cheap, yet it is also not super expensive either.
 

Categories and Ranking

Nozomi Networks
Ranking in IoT Security
2nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Operational Technology (OT) Security (2nd)
Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Ranking in IoT Security
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 32.0%, up from 27.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 7.7%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Massimiliano La Camera - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides cost saving and offers device visibility
I think it's a stable solution and don't foresee any problems in the future. It's a leading security platform and is widely used in Italy. This gives them full visibility of all devices, which is often difficult to achieve. IT managers usually lack visibility into all products and security solutions. However, this platform lets customers gain visibility of their entire device environment. I rate its stability an eight out of ten.
Alex De Miranda - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs
Palo Alto is valued for its GlobalProtect feature, which offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs. Clients also appreciate the firewall's deployment flexibility. IoT provides granular zero trust least privilege policy recommendations. The speed of zero trust policy creation depends on the complexity of the desired outcome. However, assuming a straightforward objective, the process can be quite efficient. Once the desired outcome is clearly documented, creating the policies becomes much easier as the necessary steps are already defined. From there, it's simply a matter of configuring the details and implementing the changes. Overall, creating a zero-trust policy in this scenario is a relatively simple process. Customers appreciate Palo Alto Networks IoT Security's seamless integration with various platforms, including Cisco ISE and other Cisco tools like user identification systems. This flexibility, along with Prisma Access integration, allows for comprehensive security across diverse environments and enhances interoperability with existing infrastructure. The risk assessment information from IoT Security is valuable because it guides necessary changes for compliance with best practices. This is crucial for engineers making adjustments and new deployments, ensuring alignment with industry standards. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security utilizes its next-generation firewall as a sensor, eliminating the need for additional hardware. While this multi-functionality is beneficial, it's important to note that the firewall may not be able to effectively handle every security layer, so relying solely on it for all security needs might not be optimal.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Legal Firm
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nozomi Networks?
The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?
The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty. Nozomi Networks is worth the money.
What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks should improve its pricing.
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements.
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
It is not very comprehensive in terms of visibility. When we tested, multiple application signatures were not available with Palo Alto. Fortinet, Claroty, and Nozomi had more application signatures...
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
Our primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is for the operational technology (OT) network. We have industrial systems, referred to as ICS or Industrial Control Systems, to control man...
 

Also Known As

SCADAguardian
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.