Microsoft Project vs Teamwork comparison

Microsoft and Teamwork are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7, while Teamwork is ranked #30. Microsoft holds a 2.8% mindshare in PMS, compared to Teamwork’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Teamwork users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Project

Read 85 Microsoft Project reviews

3,258 Views
2,606 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Teamwork

Read 3 Teamwork reviews

882 Views
591 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Project

Teamwork

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Teamwork and Microsoft Project are competing in the project management tools category. Teamwork has the upper hand in customer support and flexibility, whereas Microsoft Project is favored for its comprehensive feature set suitable for advanced project planning.

Features: Teamwork includes integrated communication tools, time tracking, and task management, enhancing collaboration and efficiency. Microsoft Project provides advanced scheduling, resource management, and detailed reporting, ideal for complex project planning.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Teamwork offers quick deployment and strong customer support, ensuring a smooth onboarding process. Microsoft Project provides enterprise-level deployment but may require more time and resources for implementation. Teamwork’s customer service is noted as more responsive, allowing teams to resolve issues efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: Teamwork is competitively priced with a lower upfront cost, appealing to small and medium-sized businesses with an emphasis on long-term ROI through enhanced team productivity. Microsoft Project has a higher setup cost, justified by its extensive features, achieving a strong ROI for businesses needing advanced project management solutions. Teamwork’s affordability and collaboration benefits contrast with Microsoft Project’s premium price and detailed capabilities, accommodating different budget preferences and project complexities.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Project vs. Teamwork Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project vs. Teamwork

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Project

Ranking in Project Management Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teamwork

Ranking in Project Management Software

30th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Project is 2.8%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teamwork is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Project	2.8%
Teamwork	1.1%
Other	96.1%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Jacob-George

Domain Consultant at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees

Improved project scheduling has maximized resource utilization and has reduced delays

I think the licensing structure presents a significant area for improvement. The full features are not offered on the standard E4 license. This becomes problematic when distributing the project plan. I can export the plan as Excel and CSV files, but then I lose all the rich features, including dependency mapping. To recreate all that functionality without proper licensing is challenging. Microsoft Project offers a light version available for free, but when I try to distribute a project plan, it requires separate licensing. Microsoft Project Central used to be more of an enterprise product. Microsoft Project currently focuses on very low-level task management, and it could do much more. I do not see significant advancement happening because there is confusion about where Microsoft Project is heading. I believe Microsoft should bundle the license with Outlook, Teams, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. This approach would result in more people using Microsoft Project. That is my opinion on how to improve adoption and the product offering.

Read full review

Ryan Beckstead

Multimedia Services Administrator at Brigham Young University

A project management tool that helps to manage milestones and dependencies

We use the product to design online courses. It also helps us with media production and marketing. Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports. The product is expensive. It needs…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Project are you can create critical paths pretty easily, and you can import from an Excel spreadsheet to your task list as you create it during your working sessions with your team."

"Microsoft Project offers comprehensive project overviews and the ability to rate down what we have and what we need in terms of software."

"The solution is very useful for project planning."

"The most valuable feature is probably the Kanban diagram. People are familiar with the Kanban tools. When they do their scrum meetings, they have that Kanban board where you can see the different tiles for all the queries and move them from left to right. IT is familiar with that because, for development, most of the tools have that capability. It could also be more graphical, like Asana."

"The standard project planning features and charts are most valuable."

"The solution is well established and runs very accurately."

"Microsoft Project integrates well with the Microsoft Office family of applications."

"They have begun to improve with the new cloud integration."

More Microsoft Project pros

"Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports."

"The setup was very easy. Deployment was very fast for us. We started using it within two weeks."

"I recommend this solution; it is very good for simple projects."

"It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Teamwork is easy."

Cons

"The tech support needs improvement."

"When you start getting into the more advanced features, it can become unstable. The more you use the advanced features, the more exposure you have to an unanticipated result."

"When moving resources between projects, it could be a bit more clear."

"The stability of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."

"The scalability is co-dependent on the stability of the product. We have 4000 users, and at times the product is slow."

"Microsoft Project currently focuses on very low-level task management, and it could do much more."

"The solution could be more flexible when it comes to integration."

"It is positioned at the more high end. Sometimes it's more complicated than we need."

More Microsoft Project cons

"The product is expensive. It needs to have a more robust and customizable calendar."

"The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app."

"The screen sharing provided by the solution can be a challenge to a user. Screen sharing is an area that needs improvement in the solution."

"The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license fees for the professional version, which is estimated to be approximately $1,600, and the standard version, which is approximately $1,200, may be considered expensive by some users. This is something that could be improved to make the platform more accessible to a wider audience."

"It gets expensive when having to add all of the plugins and everything that you need."

"I am not aware of any additional costs apart from the standard licensing fees of the solution."

"The cost for an on-premises-based license is a one-time fee, and the cloud-based is an annual payment plan."

"Its price could be reduced a little."

"The license is a one-time payment but it is expensive."

"We purchase perpetual licenses due to the high cost of subscriptions, which are about 1,000 Australian dollars."

"The solution has a decent annual license subscription cost, which is not high."

More Microsoft Project pricing and cost advice

"We negotiate on pricing since we are a long-term user."

"My company makes annual payments towards the licensing costs of the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Government

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	41

No data available

Questions from the Community

Has anyone moved from Microsoft Project to Smartsheet? How has your experience been with Smartsheet?

Hi @Eire Zimmermann, I helped an organization evaluate both MS-Project and Smartsheet when they were conducting their PM tool RFP. The short of it is this, MS Project is not caught up with the mo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Project?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project?

I would say Microsoft Project is affordable, but the standalone Project license should be included in the Office price to increase adoption.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs Microsoft Project

Compared 15% of the time

monday.com vs Microsoft Project

Compared 8% of the time

Asana vs Microsoft Project

Compared 8% of the time

Smartsheet vs Microsoft Project

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Microsoft Project

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Project Competitors

monday.com vs Teamwork

Compared 13% of the time

SysAid vs Teamwork

Compared 9% of the time

Wrike vs Teamwork

Compared 8% of the time

Jira vs Teamwork

Compared 6% of the time

Planview ProjectPlace vs Teamwork

Compared 4% of the time

More Teamwork Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project

March 2026

Download Microsoft Project product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

March 2026

Download Teamwork product report

Also Known As

Project Pro, MS Project

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Project helps you get started quickly and execute projects with ease. Built-in templates and familiar scheduling tools help project managers and teams stay productive.

Microsoft

Teamwork is a comprehensive project management and collaboration software that enables teams to work together efficiently and effectively. With its wide range of features and intuitive interface, Teamwork helps streamline workflows, improve communication, and increase productivity.

One of the key features of Teamwork is its task management capabilities. Users can create tasks, assign them to team members, set due dates, and track progress. This ensures that everyone is on the same page and deadlines are met. Additionally, users can create task dependencies, allowing for better coordination and sequencing of work.

Teamwork also offers powerful collaboration tools. Users can create and share documents, files, and notes, making it easy for team members to access and collaborate on important information. The software also includes a messaging feature, enabling real-time communication and reducing the need for lengthy email threads.

Another notable feature of Teamwork is its time-tracking functionality. Users can log their time spent on tasks, providing valuable insights into project progress and resource allocation. This feature is particularly useful for tracking billable hours and ensuring accurate invoicing.

Teamwork also offers robust project planning and scheduling capabilities. Users can create project timelines, set milestones, and allocate resources. The software provides a visual representation of project progress, allowing teams to easily identify bottlenecks and adjust timelines accordingly.

Furthermore, Teamwork integrates with a wide range of third-party applications, such as Google Drive, Dropbox, and Slack, enhancing collaboration and streamlining workflows. The software also offers mobile apps, enabling users to stay connected and productive on the go.

Teamwork

Sample Customers

Aston Martin, ABANCA, Airbus Group, Capita, Cardiff University, City of Saskatoon, Intel, Pegasus Airlines, South Australia Power Network (SAPN), Israeli Ministry of Construction and Housing

PayPal, eBay, Disney, Forbes, Microsoft studios, Spotify Vevo, Lenovo, HP, Honda

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project vs. Teamwork

March 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Project vs. Teamwork

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Project vs. Teamwork and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Project vs. Teamwork report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.