Microsoft Project vs Planisware comparison

"In my experience, this solution is one of the best for the waterfall management model."

"It served the purpose. It was pretty user-friendly."

"The solution is stable."

"Microsoft Project offers comprehensive project overviews and the ability to rate down what we have and what we need in terms of software."

"It's most useful feature is that it interfaces with Project Server so we can, from my perspective, from a portfolio perspective, we can see across the organization."

"It is very stable. I haven't had any kind of issues with it. It is also very scalable."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is planning."

"Planisware has introduced Agile concepts, making it capable of Agile management similar to Jira and other Agile tools."

"The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI."

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"It has an inbuilt BI tool, which can be compared to Power BI or Tableau."

"Overall, our company has all disintegrated systems, and with Planisware, we are getting a very integrated view of my portfolio reporting, cost and load, and everything else."

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

"The licensing cost is expensive and has room for improvement."

"The solution is a basic tool that does not give you analytical insights. It does not have any AI capabilities which can also help to plan."

"There have been some drawbacks with customization. Some users want it to be an automation tool."

"Its user experience can be improved while configuring it. Its reporting can also be better. Reporting is not very easy. Reports do not always work. I was trying to download some reports, and they didn't work. I don't know if it was related to the configuration that I was using. I didn't go too deep to check if something was missing."

"We'd like to be able to see different timelines as a part of one task."

"Its user interface could be a little bit more intuitive. Not everybody has the luxury of going to training and understanding which button does what and the functionality. The user interface should be improved to make it a little bit more intuitive. It is not user-friendly. I've dealt with it for a number of years, so it is not hard for me to figure it out, but you would need a quick reference guide or something to say, "Here are the basics. This is how you do X.""

"It is a traditional Waterfall-based solution, so it doesn't lend itself particularly well to Agile development. You can record Agile sprints within it, but it is not really an Agile-based product. It can store the basic information about budgets that an Agile set of work is looking to use, but that's about it."

"The solution could offer waterfall options for agile and sprint planning."

"More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"The cost for an on-premises-based license is a one-time fee, and the cloud-based is an annual payment plan."

"Pricing-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten since I feel it is a bit costly."

"The solution is expensive."

"I am not aware of any additional costs apart from the standard licensing fees of the solution."

"The solution is less expensive than other options."

"It probably was $30 per license on a monthly basis. There is no additional fee."

"The license fees for the professional version, which is estimated to be approximately $1,600, and the standard version, which is approximately $1,200, may be considered expensive by some users. This is something that could be improved to make the platform more accessible to a wider audience."

"I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"There are training and certification costs."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"It comes with a high cost."