Microsoft Project vs Planisware comparison

"The setup is pretty simple."

"The most valuable feature is probably the Kanban diagram. People are familiar with the Kanban tools. When they do their scrum meetings, they have that Kanban board where you can see the different tiles for all the queries and move them from left to right. IT is familiar with that because, for development, most of the tools have that capability. It could also be more graphical, like Asana."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Project is status reporting."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is time management."

"They have begun to improve with the new cloud integration."

"The pricing is pretty good on the enterprise agreement we have."

"The project tracking, resource utilization and the cost are the most beneficial aspects of this solution."

"The solution is well established and runs very accurately."

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"Planisware has introduced Agile concepts, making it capable of Agile management similar to Jira and other Agile tools."

"The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"It has an inbuilt BI tool, which can be compared to Power BI or Tableau."

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

"Overall, our company has all disintegrated systems, and with Planisware, we are getting a very integrated view of my portfolio reporting, cost and load, and everything else."

"When you start getting into the more advanced features, it can become unstable. The more you use the advanced features, the more exposure you have to an unanticipated result. I think we need to add the Kanban Board capability to the product that would help them advance that board into the project management methodology that's being used in the industry today. Being able to depend on Scrum management is key."

"It is a traditional Waterfall-based solution, so it doesn't lend itself particularly well to Agile development. You can record Agile sprints within it, but it is not really an Agile-based product. It can store the basic information about budgets that an Agile set of work is looking to use, but that's about it."

"Collaboration is an area that needs improvements."

"The tool's most valuable feature is scheduling."

"We'd like to have more resource allocation and monitoring features."

"I am not that close to it anymore, but I know that there were some cut and paste issues when we were trying to move one group of roles to another, and they used to muck up the interdependencies between the tiers, rows, and other things."

"When I have too many elements or items in a project, it becomes cumbersome, especially during printing."

"I would like Microsoft Project to better align with our business needs, with improved consultant support for setup and integration features that show all relevant aspects at the top level."

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

"Its price could be reduced a little."

"I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

"It gets expensive when having to add all of the plugins and everything that you need."

"Microsoft Project is an expensive solution."

"Licensing costs vary depending on the user volume. The pricing is good, I'd rate it four out of five."

"It probably was $30 per license on a monthly basis. There is no additional fee."

"We have to pay for a yearly license for Microsoft Project."

"It comes with a high cost."

"There are training and certification costs."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."