Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft System Center vs SCOM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft System Center
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (14th), Cloud Monitoring Software (25th)
SCOM
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (3rd), Network Monitoring Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Microsoft System Center and SCOM aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Microsoft System Center is designed for Application Infrastructure and holds a mindshare of 0.9%, up 0.5% compared to last year.
SCOM, on the other hand, focuses on Event Monitoring, holds 7.2% mindshare, down 10.3% since last year.
Application Infrastructure
Event Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Ajinkya Mohod - PeerSpot reviewer
May 3, 2024
Makes user management and application management easy for users
Speaking about the impact of the automation feature that impacted our company's operational efficiency, I can say that the complete tool works on automation. You just have to configure it, and it works, especially in areas like auto-patching updates. I suggest that others can definitely go ahead with Microsoft System Center, especially beginners who choose it, can get hands-on experience with it, and acquire a good understanding of how things work. In terms of the value and benefits derived from the use of the solution, I can say that my company's operations have been made simpler because of the product, especially in areas like user management and application management where we have been benefited a lot. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
MarcMermuys - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 12, 2024
Has efficient monitoring with robust integration capabilities
We use SCOM to configure different monitors using several management packs. It integrates systems like Active Directory and correlates them, and it is used for monitoring and managing systems SCOM allows integration of several systems, providing correlation between different systems such as…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Step-by-step documentation that clarifies the implementation procedure."
"I like the automated features of it that let you schedule those updates and the ability of the product to focus on the specific updates, specific platforms, and products that we're interested in keeping up to date."
"Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked."
"The availability performance matrix and the reporting capabilities are the solution's most valuable features."
"The solution is easily available. That's its most valuable aspect."
"The detail in the alarms is great."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft System Center is its GUI (graphical user interface)."
"System Center helps to create the basis for ITIL alignment."
"The tool helps to monitor Windows servers. It offers alerts from a central location."
"This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring."
"It discovers the components automatically, which is a fantastic thing. The discovery works in an automatic way, and it has a dynamic way of discovering the components, assets, and applications. It doesn't require any manual intervention."
"The solution is scalable. If you want to monitor more you have to buy more licenses, but you can add on. We don't plan to increase usage."
"This solution helps our application teams by allowing them to drill further into issues and perform a root cause analysis."
"SCOM integrates several systems and offers correlation features, like setting up everything around Active Directory or DNS."
"It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system.​"
"Alerts notify the server or service owner of problems, allowing quick decisions or actions to keep the service running based on configured thresholds."
 

Cons

"The multi-tenancy support needs to be improved. We need to have the ability to manage several different environments from one central point of administration."
"The platform's performance could be improved. Additionally, its UI needs to be well-upgraded and work faster."
"For me, the tool's UI seems to be too old."
"The platform performance and responsiveness need improvement. It still demands high computing resources."
"Could be more user friendly."
"Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software deployment, we mainly use it for Windows updates. It protects many screens and integrates with databases, but it's complex compared to other solutions. Many now use cloud-based products or other tools like Automox to deploy updates and manage vulnerabilities."
"The solution's dashboard needs improvement."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Application monitoring must be improved."
"The configurations could be better. There are multiple tests where you can do something, but they can be a trigger as well. The overriding methodologies are not that easy. The configurations are difficult. The configuration and thorough day-to-day operations to get them to the level you want takes some time. It's very difficult."
"Of course, price is always an issue with Microsoft and could be improved."
"The interface is a little bit cumbersome and certain actions could be simplified."
"SCOM needs to improve its usability."
"In terms of features that could be improved, I would say the agent integration into the operating system. We are having difficulties integrating Linux into some of the networking devices."
"It could use some system enhancements, such as better dashboards."
"The end-user components, including the dashboards, the administration console, and the web console, need to be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."
"Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."
"It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."
"I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."
"I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten means it is expensive."
"We maximized our license investment."
"Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly."
"Our Enterprise Agreement includes the price."
"We have an enterprise agreement that includes this product as part of it."
"SCOM's pricing is average."
"It is more expensive than the competition."
"The platform is cost-effective due to our existing Microsoft support."
"I don't know the exact cost because it's managed by our sales team, but Microsoft is on the higher side."
"We have to pay for a license and the price is fine for us."
"Two customers bought the enterprise agreement with Microsoft and paid for Software Assurance. But few customers don't buy it for Software Assurance. They just buy it and deploy it, and they think that we will be using it for the next five years."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center?
Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software depl...
What do you like most about SCOM?
The tool helps to monitor Windows servers. It offers alerts from a central location.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?
The platform is cost-effective due to our existing Microsoft support.
What needs improvement with SCOM?
Might be the APM (Application Performance Monitoring) solutions, which it lacks compared to other tools. I don't know what other tools are in the market, so I don't know what SCOM lacks. I need to ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

MS System Center
System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Kassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia
Dialog Telekom
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.