Mule ESB vs SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) comparison

The compared Salesforce and SPS Commerce solutions aren't in the same category. Salesforce is ranked #2 in E , with an average rating of 7.9, and holds a 25.2% mindshare in the category. SPS Commerce is ranked #4 in E , and holds a 17.0% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SPS Commerce users who would recommend it.

Mule ESB

Read 47 Mule ESB reviews

5,351 Views
4,451 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI)

Read 1 SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) review

54 Views
34 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mule ESB

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI)

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Salesforce, Red Hat and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Mule ESB

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (2nd)

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI)

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

EDI (4th), Supply Chain Management Software (8th)

Mindshare comparison

Mule ESB and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Mule ESB is designed for Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) and holds a mindshare of 25.2%, up 24.9% compared to last year.
SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), on the other hand, focuses on EDI, holds 17.0% mindshare, up 8.4% since last year.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

EDI

Featured Reviews

PurbayanSaha

Technology Consultant at Ernst & Young

Sep 9, 2024

Has API-led architecture and provides a unique, user-friendly, and scalable architecture for hosting APIs

We're using our Mule ESB mostly for integration projects for multinational companies that do business on a B2C or B2B basis. We also work with companies with multiple third-party vendors employed under their payroll. The Mule ESB helps integrate data from third-party systems or vendors with the…

Read full review

reviewer1546587

Works at a retailer

Mar 25, 2021

Easy to use, good support, integrates with ShipStation, and has helped reduce our workload

SPS is our primary EDI provider for all our fulfillment needs. We use SPS to fulfill orders from HomeDepot and Walmart, which are our two biggest customers. SPS is seamlessly connected to our ERP system and we have never had any issues processing orders. Orders from SPs flow into our ERP system…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."

"The pricing must be improved."

"Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."

"Mule ESB is an expensive solution."

"Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners."

"The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."

"The solution is expensive."

"Mule ESB is a costly solution. We pay approximately $80,000 annually for the system. The cost of the number of instances, annual subscription, and cloud hosting services are expensive."

More Mule ESB pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive to my liking but there is a value attached to having peace of mind that they will help you out if you need their support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Retailer

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Wholesaler/Distributor

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company

I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...

See all answers

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?

Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mule ESB?

The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB

Compared 33% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs Mule ESB

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle SOA Suite vs Mule ESB

Compared 7% of the time

webMethods.io vs Mule ESB

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs Mule ESB

Compared 7% of the time

More Mule ESB Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI)

Compared 29% of the time

OpenText Trading Grid vs SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI)

Compared 20% of the time

Infor Nexus vs SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI)

Compared 13% of the time

SAP Ariba Supply Chain Collaboration vs SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI)

Compared 13% of the time

More SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB

October 2024

Download Mule ESB product report

No data available

Also Known As

No data available

Fulfillment (EDI), Trading Partner Integration Center

Learn More

Salesforce

SPS Commerce

Overview

For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

With SPS Commerce Fulfillment, you'll have an entire team of trusted advisors ready to help you gain more from your EDI and achieve 100% compliance and ongoing success with your retailer, grocer and distributor trading partners. Our full-service solution is fast, reliable and scalable and can handle your most complex fulfillment requirements for any trading partner, across any channel, including stores, e-commerce and marketplaces.

Sample Customers

Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot

Pet Supplies Plus, Royce Leather, J.R. Watkins Co., Zumba, Deva Concepts, River of Goods, Brooks Sports Inc., Crocs Inc., Redcat Racing, THOS. BAKER, Rugs Direct, WMH Tool Group

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Salesforce, Red Hat and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.