Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Trading Grid vs SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Trading Grid
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (12th), Cloud Data Integration (32nd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (19th)
SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI)
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
EDI (4th), Supply Chain Management Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

OpenText Trading Grid and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. OpenText Trading Grid is designed for Business-to-Business Middleware and holds a mindshare of 4.7%, up 4.4% compared to last year.
SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), on the other hand, focuses on EDI, holds 17.0% mindshare, up 8.4% since last year.
Business-to-Business Middleware
EDI
 

Featured Reviews

VARUNKUMAR - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 19, 2022
Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines
The good thing about OpenText is that we have the mapping specification guideline available, which is not there in a solution like SEEBURGER. Whenever you want to take a decision to move away from OpenText, you have already documented your mapping and what your mapping looks like. So you go to the next provider, provide them with that mapping specification, and it'll be very easy for them to develop a new map instead of just taking the data - input data, output data - and then looking for how the data is getting transformed. So you have the mapping spec level which is a very good feature of OpenText, which we do not have in SEEBURGER. It's very hard to move from SEEBURGER. The solution is easy to implement. It's stable and reliable. They are the industry leaders in the integration space.
reviewer1546587 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 25, 2021
Easy to use, good support, integrates with ShipStation, and has helped reduce our workload
SPS is our primary EDI provider for all our fulfillment needs. We use SPS to fulfill orders from HomeDepot and Walmart, which are our two biggest customers. SPS is seamlessly connected to our ERP system and we have never had any issues processing orders. Orders from SPs flow into our ERP system…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is expensive to my liking but there is a value attached to having peace of mind that they will help you out if you need their support."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Retailer
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Retailer
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Wholesaler/Distributor
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid
Fulfillment (EDI), Trading Partner Integration Center
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin
Pet Supplies Plus, Royce Leather, J.R. Watkins Co., Zumba, Deva Concepts, River of Goods, Brooks Sports Inc., Crocs Inc., Redcat Racing, THOS. BAKER, Rugs Direct, WMH Tool Group
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Salesforce, Informatica and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.