Boomi iPaaS vs OpenText Trading Grid comparison

Boomi and OpenText are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Boomi is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #22. Boomi holds a 8.6% mindshare in PaaS, compared to OpenText’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Boomi iPaaS

Read 29 Boomi iPaaS reviews

4,030 Views
2,257 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

OpenText Trading Grid

Read 1 OpenText Trading Grid review

877 Views
377 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

OpenText Trading Grid

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Informatica and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (17th), AI Observability (38th)

OpenText Trading Grid

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (12th), Cloud Data Integration (39th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 8.6%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Trading Grid is 1.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Boomi iPaaS	8.6%
OpenText Trading Grid	1.8%
Other	89.6%

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Pradeep Nunna

Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger

Enables swift integration and automation for seamless order-to-cash processes

Boomi iPaaS offers different modules based on customer use cases, which I find valuable. The integrations and API management are particularly beneficial. The setup process is straightforward, and within three days, you can start working on Boomi iPaaS. It provides automation for everything from order to cash, which is thoroughly documented, tracked, and streamlined within Boomi iPaaS. Additionally, Boomi aids initiatives involving AI by allowing prompts to create integrations and automatically generating documentation.

Read full review

VARUNKUMAR

Mgr Value Chain Integration/EDI at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines

The good thing about OpenText is that we have the mapping specification guideline available, which is not there in a solution like SEEBURGER. Whenever you want to take a decision to move away from OpenText, you have already documented your mapping and what your mapping looks like. So you go to the next provider, provide them with that mapping specification, and it'll be very easy for them to develop a new map instead of just taking the data - input data, output data - and then looking for how the data is getting transformed. So you have the mapping spec level which is a very good feature of OpenText, which we do not have in SEEBURGER. It's very hard to move from SEEBURGER. The solution is easy to implement. It's stable and reliable. They are the industry leaders in the integration space.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to learn and implement."

"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."

"Boomi iPaaS has substantially reduced operational costs by providing out-of-the-box connectors that expedite the integration process with enterprise systems."

"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."

"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."

"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."

"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."

"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."

More Boomi iPaaS pros

"The solution is easy to implement."

Cons

"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."

"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."

"There should be more scripting possibilities."

"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."

"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."

"Although Boomi iPaaS is top in the market, there might be room for improvement in the ETL aspect, which was recently integrated as another module. This aspect of Boomi iPaaS is not mature enough at the moment."

"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."

"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."

More Boomi iPaaS cons

"Technical support needs to be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."

"Approximately 20k annually."

"The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."

"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."

"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is expensive. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle."

More Boomi iPaaS pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 10% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

More Boomi iPaaS Competitors

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 19% of the time

webMethods.io vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 13% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 10% of the time

TrueCommerce EDI vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Trading Grid Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

January 2026

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

January 2026

Download OpenText Trading Grid product report

Also Known As

Boomi

Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid

Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

Boomi

OpenText Trading Grid (formerly GXS) is a unique global integration platform that enables and streamlines cross enterprise business processes. With extreme flexibility and a service-oriented, business-to-business e-commerce platform, the Grid helps companies automate global trading communities by shielding complexity from rapidly changing standards, eliminating manual and duplicative efforts and enabling a new level of process integration and business intelligence.

OpenText

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Informatica and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.