Boomi iPaaS vs OpenText Trading Grid comparison

Boomi and OpenText are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Boomi is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while OpenText is ranked #19. Boomi holds a 10.2% mindshare in PaaS, compared to OpenText’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Boomi iPaaS

Read 28 Boomi iPaaS reviews

1,903 Views
1,375 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Trading Grid

Read 1 OpenText Trading Grid review

239 Views
173 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

OpenText Trading Grid

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Trading Grid

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (12th), Cloud Data Integration (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 10.2%, up from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Trading Grid is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Integration solution proves maturity and drives productivity

There are many features we're using. We're starting to do AI now regarding integration with other platforms, focusing on creating integrations. A significant area for improvement is version control. Currently, you develop and cannot properly roll back to a previous version unless you create different versions. With proper version control, you could know which version to revert to and test other versions.

Read full review

VARUNKUMAR

Mgr Value Chain Integration/EDI at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines

The good thing about OpenText is that we have the mapping specification guideline available, which is not there in a solution like SEEBURGER. Whenever you want to take a decision to move away from OpenText, you have already documented your mapping and what your mapping looks like. So you go to the next provider, provide them with that mapping specification, and it'll be very easy for them to develop a new map instead of just taking the data - input data, output data - and then looking for how the data is getting transformed. So you have the mapping spec level which is a very good feature of OpenText, which we do not have in SEEBURGER. It's very hard to move from SEEBURGER. The solution is easy to implement. It's stable and reliable. They are the industry leaders in the integration space.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."

"The maturity of the product is significant."

"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."

"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."

"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."

"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."

"I have found the solution to be scalable."

"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."

More Boomi iPaaS pros

"The solution is easy to implement."

Cons

"The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration."

"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."

"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."

"There are stability issues."

"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."

"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."

"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."

"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."

More Boomi iPaaS cons

"Technical support needs to be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."

"The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is expensive. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."

"The pricing is not reasonable at all. It's very high."

"Approximately 20k annually."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle."

More Boomi iPaaS pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

Although Boomi iPaaS is top in the market, there might be room for improvement in the ETL aspect, which was recently integrated as another module. This aspect of Boomi iPaaS is not mature enough at...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 24% of the time

webMethods.io vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 8% of the time

SSIS vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Glue vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

More Boomi iPaaS Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 27% of the time

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 21% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 19% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 10% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Trading Grid Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

March 2025

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

February 2025

Download OpenText Trading Grid product report

Also Known As

Boomi

Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid

Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

Boomi

OpenText Trading Grid (formerly GXS) is a unique global integration platform that enables and streamlines cross enterprise business processes. With extreme flexibility and a service-oriented, business-to-business e-commerce platform, the Grid helps companies automate global trading communities by shielding complexity from rapidly changing standards, eliminating manual and duplicative efforts and enabling a new level of process integration and business intelligence.

OpenText

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.