Boomi iPaaS vs OpenText Trading Grid comparison

Boomi and OpenText are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Boomi is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #22. Boomi holds a 8.6% mindshare in PaaS, compared to OpenText’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Boomi iPaaS

Read 29 Boomi iPaaS reviews

4,030 Views
2,257 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

OpenText Trading Grid

Read 1 OpenText Trading Grid review

877 Views
377 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

OpenText Trading Grid

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Informatica and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,435 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (17th), AI Observability (38th)

OpenText Trading Grid

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (12th), Cloud Data Integration (39th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 8.6%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Trading Grid is 1.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Boomi iPaaS	8.6%
OpenText Trading Grid	1.8%
Other	89.6%

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Integration solution proves maturity and drives productivity

There are many features we're using. We're starting to do AI now regarding integration with other platforms, focusing on creating integrations. A significant area for improvement is version control. Currently, you develop and cannot properly roll back to a previous version unless you create different versions. With proper version control, you could know which version to revert to and test other versions.

Read full review

VARUNKUMAR

Mgr Value Chain Integration/EDI at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines

The good thing about OpenText is that we have the mapping specification guideline available, which is not there in a solution like SEEBURGER. Whenever you want to take a decision to move away from OpenText, you have already documented your mapping and what your mapping looks like. So you go to the next provider, provide them with that mapping specification, and it'll be very easy for them to develop a new map instead of just taking the data - input data, output data - and then looking for how the data is getting transformed. So you have the mapping spec level which is a very good feature of OpenText, which we do not have in SEEBURGER. It's very hard to move from SEEBURGER. The solution is easy to implement. It's stable and reliable. They are the industry leaders in the integration space.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."

"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."

"Boomi iPaaS makes it easy to organize ETL procedures that populate data warehouses."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."

"The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi."

"The maturity of the product is significant."

"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."

More Boomi iPaaS pros

"The solution is easy to implement."

Cons

"Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios."

"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."

"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."

"There should be more scripting possibilities."

"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."

"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."

"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."

More Boomi iPaaS cons

"Technical support needs to be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."

"The Platinum package is good for licensing, but I’m not sure about the cost and improvements."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is expensive. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle."

"The pricing is not reasonable at all. It's very high."

"It is an expensive platform."

"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."

"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."

More Boomi iPaaS pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 10% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

More Boomi iPaaS Competitors

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 19% of the time

webMethods.io vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 13% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 11% of the time

TrueCommerce EDI vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Trading Grid Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

January 2026

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

December 2025

Download OpenText Trading Grid product report

Also Known As

Boomi

Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid

Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

Boomi

OpenText Trading Grid (formerly GXS) is a unique global integration platform that enables and streamlines cross enterprise business processes. With extreme flexibility and a service-oriented, business-to-business e-commerce platform, the Grid helps companies automate global trading communities by shielding complexity from rapidly changing standards, eliminating manual and duplicative efforts and enabling a new level of process integration and business intelligence.

OpenText

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Informatica and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.