Boomi iPaaS vs OpenText Trading Grid comparison

Boomi and OpenText are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Boomi is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.5, while OpenText is ranked #19. Boomi holds a 9.1% mindshare in PaaS, compared to OpenText’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Boomi iPaaS

Read 26 Boomi iPaaS reviews

2,160 Views
1,514 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

OpenText Trading Grid

Read 1 OpenText Trading Grid review

240 Views
178 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

OpenText Trading Grid

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Trading Grid

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (12th), Cloud Data Integration (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 9.1%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Trading Grid is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Subhajit Bhattacharjee

Lead Consultant at Itcinfotech

Exceptional drag-and-drop integration module

It would be great to have more assistance and credit services for additional features. For instance, virtual class initials are available but not for backend processing moves. Making that more visible, like other Azure products, would be helpful. Moreover, the documentation is good, but it could be improved. It is changing every day, and I sometimes find that it's not updated enough or some code levels are not included.

Read full review

VARUNKUMAR

Mgr Value Chain Integration/EDI at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines

The good thing about OpenText is that we have the mapping specification guideline available, which is not there in a solution like SEEBURGER. Whenever you want to take a decision to move away from OpenText, you have already documented your mapping and what your mapping looks like. So you go to the next provider, provide them with that mapping specification, and it'll be very easy for them to develop a new map instead of just taking the data - input data, output data - and then looking for how the data is getting transformed. So you have the mapping spec level which is a very good feature of OpenText, which we do not have in SEEBURGER. It's very hard to move from SEEBURGER. The solution is easy to implement. It's stable and reliable. They are the industry leaders in the integration space.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Boomi iPaaS has substantially reduced operational costs by providing out-of-the-box connectors that expedite the integration process with enterprise systems."

"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."

"I have found the solution to be scalable."

"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."

"It is easy to learn and implement."

"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."

"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."

More Boomi iPaaS pros

"The solution is easy to implement."

Cons

"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."

"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."

"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."

"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."

"The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration."

"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."

"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."

More Boomi iPaaS cons

"Technical support needs to be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle."

"The pricing is not reasonable at all. It's very high."

"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."

"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."

"The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is expensive. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."

More Boomi iPaaS pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle. I don't know the exact price of the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 23% of the time

webMethods.io vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 8% of the time

SSIS vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Glue vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

More Boomi iPaaS Competitors

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 26% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 25% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 21% of the time

TrueCommerce EDI vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 14% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Trading Grid Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

December 2024

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

December 2024

Download OpenText Trading Grid product report

Also Known As

Boomi

Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid

Learn More

Boomi

OpenText

Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

OpenText Trading Grid (formerly GXS) is a unique global integration platform that enables and streamlines cross enterprise business processes. With extreme flexibility and a service-oriented, business-to-business e-commerce platform, the Grid helps companies automate global trading communities by shielding complexity from rapidly changing standards, eliminating manual and duplicative efforts and enabling a new level of process integration and business intelligence.

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

December 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.