Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi iPaaS vs OpenText Trading Grid comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.3
Boomi iPaaS support is responsive and knowledgeable; users value speed, community access, and ongoing platform improvements despite minor issues.
No sentiment score available
Seamlessly meeting SLAs and providing excellent responses to challenges and issues related to interface and data connectivity.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.6
Boomi iPaaS faces challenges with limited API management, scripting, documentation, pricing, and interface, requiring performance and marketing improvements.
No sentiment score available
The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Boomi iPaaS is scalable and versatile, but pricing and configuration challenges emerge with high integration and complex tasks.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Boomi iPaaS offers a cost-effective, usage-based licensing model, ideal for large-scale applications, though costs can quickly increase.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Boomi iPaaS is stable with 99.99% availability, though high-volume integration issues lead some to prefer Jitterbit's interface.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
Boomi iPaaS excels in low-code integration, scalability, user-friendliness, extensive connectors, and delivers high ROI with efficient deployment.
No sentiment score available
The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration.
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Trading Grid
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (12th), Cloud Data Integration (32nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 8.9%, up from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Trading Grid is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Berniem Elfrink - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that is easy to use, cost-effective, and offers a large set of functionalities
I use Boomi AtomSphere Integration in my company to manage all types of integrations, including SAP integrations, database integrations, and other enterprise-level integrations The most valuable features of the solution are its mapping functionality and the low-code, no-code nature of the…
VARUNKUMAR - PeerSpot reviewer
Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines
The good thing about OpenText is that we have the mapping specification guideline available, which is not there in a solution like SEEBURGER. Whenever you want to take a decision to move away from OpenText, you have already documented your mapping and what your mapping looks like. So you go to the next provider, provide them with that mapping specification, and it'll be very easy for them to develop a new map instead of just taking the data - input data, output data - and then looking for how the data is getting transformed. So you have the mapping spec level which is a very good feature of OpenText, which we do not have in SEEBURGER. It's very hard to move from SEEBURGER. The solution is easy to implement. It's stable and reliable. They are the industry leaders in the integration space.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Retailer
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle. I don't know the exact price of the product.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've us...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Boomi
Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.