Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (7th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (14th), API Management (23rd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (12th)
SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI)
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
EDI (4th), Supply Chain Management Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is designed for Business-to-Business Middleware and holds a mindshare of 10.2%, up 8.0% compared to last year.
SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), on the other hand, focuses on EDI, holds 17.0% mindshare, up 8.4% since last year.
Business-to-Business Middleware
EDI
 

Featured Reviews

Choon Hwa Khoh - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 28, 2023
Easy to configure with no programming skills needed and helpful support
We primarily use the solution for content conversion and file transfers.  There are no programming skills needed. It's easy to configure.  The features are great. They have a lot of them. The solution can scale. It is stable and reliable. We have not had any issues. Technical support has been…
reviewer1546587 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 25, 2021
Easy to use, good support, integrates with ShipStation, and has helped reduce our workload
SPS is our primary EDI provider for all our fulfillment needs. We use SPS to fulfill orders from HomeDepot and Walmart, which are our two biggest customers. SPS is seamlessly connected to our ERP system and we have never had any issues processing orders. Orders from SPs flow into our ERP system…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay for a maximum number of setups, then we pay per customer map, and we pay maintenance on each one of those. BIS provides the flexibility to pay as you grow. The price of each customer map is €200 and the hourly rate for maintenance is fairly reasonable."
"The pricing is cheap. In fact, when I saw the pricing, I thought, "Really? What's the catch?" But the functionality that we get out of it, for the price we pay, is great value."
"All the new adapters are individually priced, which is good. You don't buy the whole system and then if you don't use it, you don't use it. You only buy the stuff you want..."
"Pricing has always seemed fair."
"The cost-based model is slightly different now in SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). They changed the licensing, based on adapters and other things. In the old style of licensing, the whole suite was one license..."
"I have had exposure to other big vendors over the years and would have to say the pricing is pretty typical. They all fall into a common pricing range, at least the bigger vendors: Axway, IBM Sterling, Globalscape, and SEEBURGER. They all fall into that mid-tier pricing. So, SEEBURGER is commensurate with other large integration vendors operating in this space. Maybe it is lower than some of the really high-end ones. You can get some of these high-end transactional messaging integration systems, like TIBCO, that tend to be kind of on a higher echelon of pricing. I would say SEEBURGER is more mid-level."
"It has a very goofy pricing model in the sense that they have so many components and it's not very clear what components you require to do your work. When you ask for that, you learn that there's a surcharge for them. It's not that you buy a product and you can use all the compatibilities. They have all these different bits and pieces of it and you have to pay extra for all those things."
"We have additional ad hoc development costs, but those vary depending on if we're bringing on another third-party into our systems via the EDI integration. So, that's highly variable."
"It is expensive to my liking but there is a value attached to having peace of mind that they will help you out if you need their support."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Logistics Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Retailer
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Wholesaler/Distributor
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a highly stable solution that offers rich features for our B2B integration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
I've heard that the solution is cheaper when compared to other products in the market.
What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
The solution's documentation is not up to the mark and needs to be improved.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

SEEBURGER BIS
Fulfillment (EDI), Trading Partner Integration Center
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza
Pet Supplies Plus, Royce Leather, J.R. Watkins Co., Zumba, Deva Concepts, River of Goods, Brooks Sports Inc., Crocs Inc., Redcat Racing, THOS. BAKER, Rugs Direct, WMH Tool Group
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Salesforce, Informatica and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.