Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MuleSoft RPA vs ServiceNow Automation Engine comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automate
Sponsored
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MuleSoft RPA
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
38th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ServiceNow Automation Engine
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
31st
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Automate is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft RPA is 0.8%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Automation Engine is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

Anabel Marco - PeerSpot reviewer
Automates processes efficiently with cost-effective scaling and robust customer support
Web scraping is quite good since it offers a lot of possibilities. Another important feature for me is its compatibility with MBI, the Power that is ISEQUADO Centers. I appreciate the ability to scale and increase the number of bots or studios without additional expense. Automate's non-reliance on additional orchestrators makes it quite cost-effective.
Use MuleSoft RPA?
Share your opinion
Robert Gonzales - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides better ecosystem control and duplication control but have duplication issue
The initial setup is complex. During deployment, we identify the assets we want to include and the site, among other details. We ensure everything is translated into a common language using a CML-type discussion, allowing consistency across all elements. We aim to standardize everything by using JSON as our common input format. We are deploying existing features, so most of the work is straightforward. We do need some developers, particularly ServiceNow developers, to be involved. However, there isn't a lot of additional work required. We need some licensing from ServiceNow to enable these feature sets, but there aren't many other requirements.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Construction Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
University
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HelpSystems AutoMate?
We use it for specific cases, mainly secure file transfers, which are vital for us. And it works for us.
What is your primary use case for HelpSystems AutoMate?
I am a consultant and I am making a lot of processes in human resources, payroll, certifications, trainings, web scra...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortra Automate?
The pricing is quite good compared to its competitors. Competitors are often more expensive than Automate. I would ra...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Automation Engine?
The solution is expensive. The primary expense lies in licensing from ServiceNow. Additionally, there are costs assoc...
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Automation Engine?
The whole automation process still has a problem with duplication. They identify an asset, relate it to its physical ...
What is your primary use case for ServiceNow Automation Engine?
The primary use of ServiceNow Automation Engine is to enable CMDR to identify all the different feeds and systems, al...
 

Also Known As

HelpSystems Automate, Automate
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aldergrove Financial Group, Preferred Health Professionals, Mindbeam Technologies, First Credit Union in British Columbia, Vestcom International, Prime Liberty Benefits, University of Tampa, CNLBancshares, World Precision Instruments, BJ's Restaurants, Globe Pequot Press, Accudata Technologies, Norton Healthcare, Pacific Toxicology Laboratories
1. Accenture 2. Aetna 3. Allianz 4. American Express 5. AT&T 6. Bank of America 7. Barclays 8. BNY Mellon 9. Capital One 10. Cisco 11. Coca-Cola 12. Colgate-Palmolive 13. Comcast 14. Deloitte 15. Deutsche Bank 16. DXC Technology 17. E&Y 18. FedEx 19. General Motors 20. GlaxoSmithKline 21. HSBC 22. IBM 23. Intel 24. Johnson & Johnson 25. JPMorgan Chase 26. KPMG 27. Liberty Mutual 28. Mastercard 29. McKesson 30. Merck & Co. 31.MetLife 32. Microsoft 33. Morgan Stanley 34. Nationwide 35. Nestlé 36. Nike 37. Novartis 38. Oracle 39. PepsiCo 40. Pfizer
1. Accenture2. Aetna3. AIG4. Airbus5. Allstate6. American Express7. AT&T8. Bank of America9. Barclays10. BHP Billiton11. Cisco12. Coca-Cola13. Comcast14. Dell15. E*TRADE16. FedEx17. Ford Motor Company18. GE19. Google20. H&R Block21. Home Depot22. IBM23. Intel24. JPMorgan Chase25. Kroger26. Liberty Mutual27. Lockheed Martin28. Marriott International29. Mastercard30. McKinsey & Company31. Microsoft32. Morgan Stanley33. Nike34. Nordstrom35. Oracle36. PepsiCo37. PwC38. Rakuten39. SAP40. Siemens41. SoFi42. Spotify43. Starbucks44. TD Ameritrade45. Toyota46. UnitedHealth Group47. Visa48. Walmart49. Wells Fargo
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Microsoft and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.