Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform comparison

Netwrix and Zscaler are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Netwrix is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6, while Zscaler is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Additionally, 95% of Netwrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Read 25 Netwrix Endpoint Protector reviews

2,557 Views
1,385 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Read 62 Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform reviews

2,911 Views
2,153 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 7, 2024

Netwrix Endpoint Protector and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform compete in the cybersecurity category. Zscaler appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, making it a more robust choice.

Features: Netwrix Endpoint Protector provides ease of device control, comprehensive USB management, and straightforward endpoint protection, making it a solid option for local data security. Zscaler offers robust cloud security, reliable zero-trust architecture, and diverse security features tailored for cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: Netwrix users suggest improvements in reporting capabilities, policy management, and expanding integration options with other tools. Zscaler users express a need for enhanced logging capabilities, simplified configuration processes, and more streamlined user management to reduce complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Netwrix Endpoint Protector is generally simple to deploy, and users appreciate its customer service support. Zscaler's deployment is perceived as more complex due to its extensive features, though it is supported by proactive customer service, reflecting a trade-off between ease of use and comprehensive security.

Pricing and ROI: Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers cost-effectiveness with affordable setup costs and quick ROI, making it attractive to budget-conscious users. Zscaler requires higher initial investment but is valued for its enhanced security and features, providing a justified ROI over the long term.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 812,651 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (4th), Application Control (3rd), ZTNA as a Service (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (10th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (8th), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (1st)

Featured Reviews

SunnyKumar

Senior IT Engineer at Instawork

Sep 26, 2023

Enhancing data security with proactive protection and control

I've encountered some latency issues that appear to be related to the internet speed. When I install the agent on the laptop, the internet speed often drops from 100 MBPS to around 80 MBPS or even as low as 50 MBPS at times. The slow response seems to be connected to the fact that all network traffic is routed through this agent. The challenge arises when trying to analyze the logs, as every single click and action, even a single command in GitHub, generates a multitude of logs. This makes it difficult to extract relevant information. It would be helpful to implement filtering mechanisms so that we can sort and view the data based on software and vendor, providing more clarity and ease in analysis.

Read full review

Vikram Srirama.

Deputy General Manager at Sagility

Oct 4, 2023

A VPN alternative that delivers a zero trust model

The primary use cases for the Zscaler include secure channel access for applications, private file service access, and remote connectivity to the active directory. These are the top three essential functionalities provided by Zscaler Previously, we utilized HubSpot, which required connecting to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The role-based access features for the teams that administer it is good."

"The core of its value lies in obtaining logs remotely and exercising control over what employees can or cannot use."

"All of the features are effective, but the highlight feature of the product was the data layer inspection. When we talk about a DLP product, data packet inspection is very important. Securing data at rest is easy, but securing data in transit is challenging. We used it comprehensively to secure end drives, data transfers, secure hard drives, and end-user machines. It proved monumental in our operations."

"Compared to a lot of the USB management systems out there, Endpoint Protector is the only one that comes with true USB management and the DLP side of it. I'm pretty impressed because I've used several solutions with DLP and USB management, and I've never seen granularity like this solution has."

"The device control is a big deal for us because we can actually lock out removable drives and different types of hardware. It allows us to have better control over what end-users plug into their computers, and we can have deny lists and tighten our security posture."

"It also provides us with the ability to lock down a wide variety of USB devices, which is pretty important because we don't want certain data accessed. It does a really good job when it comes to the versatility of the exit points it supports, making sure that important data does not leave our organization."

"The software is easy to use and the dashboard is intuitive."

"The console is friendly and it supports Mac."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pros

"The most valuable features are the File Type Control and SSL bypass policies. We"

"The most valuable feature is its seamless integration capabilities, streamlining the process by eliminating the need for extensive installations."

"The scalability is pretty good."

"Yes, it is very stable. I have never seen it go down, not once."

"The scalability of the solution is great."

"Users get direct secure access to applications over the internet."

"On DLP terms, Zscaler Cloud DLP ensures that data doesn't go outside of the organization. So on the network level, Zscaler does a pretty good job."

"It is straightforward to set up."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pros

Cons

"We are currently facing an issue where it is blocking the Winman software, which is something that we don't want to happen because we use it in our accounts department to pay taxes."

"I have faced issues which shouldn't be related to this product. This product is purely a DLP, so it should only protect my data. I don't know what is happening with their agent or what is happening with the software, but it messes up my endpoint. For example, people are facing bandwidth issues. Before I deployed this on an endpoint, people were getting internet speeds of 40 or 50 Mbps. After deploying it, that would come down to 10 Mbps. And if I uninstalled the agent, it would go back to 50 Mbps."

"It needs to improve in terms of policy customization."

"There are times when the server needs to be updated, and it would help if I got a notification for when the newest version comes out, because at the moment, I'm going in every now and then and checking. Sometimes it comes out and I didn't know it had come out."

"When you want to uninstall and reinstall, there are a lot of issues. You have to do a lot of workarounds to reinstall Endpoint Protector. This is a major issue that we have constantly because we still have old systems with XP. While there are only very few, we need to run them because there are machines attached that only run on XP. When we need to uninstall and reinstall on XP or Windows 10, we have serious issues left in the Registry Editor everywhere. There is a lot of manual interference to get the reinstallation to work. For the uninstallation of Endpoint Protector, they need to work on this so it doesn't leave any leftovers behind."

"I would rate the role-based access features for administrators a six out of ten. There's work to be done on the granularity of roles that can be assigned to an administrator but there is role-based administrator access present. That's why it's not a zero rating."

"Because it is only an Endpoint Protector at this point in time, it does not have a network DLP component. There's only an endpoint DLP component. In the future, it would be good if a network DLP component could be embedded and extended to have network DLP capabilities."

"One of the areas where there is room for improvement is support. It takes time for them to respond. They need to respond on time. Instead of sending an email, I think it would be very helpful to say, 'Let's set up a WebEx to see what's really going on,' instead of the back and forth of email."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector cons

"The DX layer could be better if it had improved visibility."

"Another area of improvement is implementation through non-client connectors. The solution can be implemented in two ways. One uses the back file; the other one uses client connectors. So the client connector is pretty fast, but when it comes to non-client connectors and procedures, it's kind of delayed and slow."

"There could be more DLP-related features. Additionally, there needs to be flexibility for integrating ISP features."

"The customers would benefit from more robust documentation and conversations around configurations, as it is slightly complex."

"The tool must provide IP-blocking features."

"The product must allow users to check logs for an entire year in the local console."

"More on-prem infrastructure is required when Zscaler Private Access is to be implemented as a single point of entry."

"The menu for the ZIA portal could be organized a little bit differently. The most-used modules should be at the top of the menus, not somewhere near the bottom, some of them are not organized well in my opinion."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has average pricing."

"The minimum number of licenses they sell is 50 or 150 users."

"It has a fair price. They just changed recently from perpetual licensing. When I bought it, I bought it on perpetual license, then they changed the whole company policy to go to subscription. It was a bit of a shock to us because we haven't upgraded it that many times. However, after speaking to CoSoSys directly, they gave us a very good renewal price."

"The price of Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys is more or less the same as other competing solutions."

"The pricing is very competitive and is cheaper in comparison to that of other solutions. It makes it an easy decision to go with EPP for the data loss prevention infrastructure."

"The software comes with a higher price tag when compared to other DLP solutions."

"For what it's doing, the cost is somewhat high for us, but it's the cost of doing business with the clients that we have."

"We have a limited budget for our media section. When we purchased it last year, we migrated from a different solution to this solution, and at that time, they told us that the cost will remain the same, but this year, they increased the price by 20% or something like that. I am not sure about the exact price, but let's say from 8,000, it increased to 10,000. It was a huge gap, and we couldn't bear this cost because we have a limited budget. When we spoke to them, they understood our problem and reduced it to the same price that we had last year."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pricing and cost advice

"The price is competitive."

"It's an affordable solution"

"Zscaler DLP solution is expensive, with a fixed pricing structure that is billed annually and monthly. There are no additional costs for licenses."

"The pricing is expensive and on the higher end. Honestly, in my opinion, it is not worth the price."

"Zscaler Cloud DLP is moderately priced. We pay around 2 million rupees per year."

"Zscaler Private Access is extremely expensive."

"Zscaler CASB is an expensive solution."

"Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

812,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Endpoint Protector?

Its robust security audit and compliance functionalities prove especially beneficial for businesses in sectors like BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance) and Information Technology.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Endpoint Protector?

The pricing is reasonable for this particular market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Endpoint Protector?

The only aspect that prevents it from being a perfect solution is the occasional slower response time.

See all answers

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zscaler SASE?

The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler SASE?

Zscaler SASE is quite expensive compared to other solutions. The price is not fixed and it does not include all of the features, so my advice for organizations would be to evaluate their specific n...

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 30% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Safetica ONE vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 9% of the time

Next DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Axis Security vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Wiz vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

September 2024

Download Netwrix Endpoint Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

September 2024

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform product report

Also Known As

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector

Zscaler SASE, Zscaler DLP, Zscaler CASB, Zscaler CSPM, Zscaler Browser Isolation, Zscaler Posture Control

Learn More

Netwrix

Zscaler

Overview

Content Aware Protection
Scanning data in motion
Monitor, control and block file transfers. Detailed control through both content and context inspection.

Device Control
USB & peripheral port control
Lockdown, monitor and manage devices. Granular control based on Vendor ID, Product ID, Serial Number and more.

Enforced Encryption
Automatic USB encryption
Encrypt, manage and secure USB storage devices by safeguarding data in transit. Password-based, easy to use and very efficient.

eDiscovery
Scanning data at rest
Discover, encrypt and delete sensitive data. Detailed content and context inspection through manual or automatic scans

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform acts as a VPN alternative for secure remote access, cloud protection, and zero-trust strategies. It enables secure data transmission, supports remote work, and enhances compliance through a cloud-based architecture, offering improved performance and simplified management.

Designed for organizations seeking secure application access and robust data protection, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform delivers a comprehensive solution through seamless VPN connectivity, data loss prevention, and SSL inspection. Its cloud integration ensures scalability and reliability, while its interface provides intuitive management. Companies benefit from automatic secure access, minimizing constant authentication needs, and safeguarding sensitive data. The platform allows easy deployment and integration with diverse identity providers, granting granular control for access and application segmentation. Despite powerful capabilities, enhancements are needed in speed, bandwidth, and legacy support, with users noting interface and configuration challenges.

What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform?

Seamless VPN Connectivity: Provides automatic secure access without repetitive authentication.
Strong Security Measures: Offers DLP and SSL inspection for data protection.
Cloud Integration: Ensures scalability and performance optimization.
Granular Access Control: Manages access with application-specific segmentation.

What benefits should companies look for in reviews when evaluating this platform?

Performance: Enhanced connectivity and reduced latency.
Data Protection: Comprehensive DLP and encryption capabilities.
Scalability: Efficient handling of growing organizational demands.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup and integration with IDPs.

In specific industries, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange has been implemented to enhance security protocols in fields like finance and healthcare. By prioritizing data protection and compliance, it assists companies in safely managing sensitive information and meeting regulatory requirements. Organizations leverage its features to ensure secure operations across remote and cloud environments, adapting to industry-specific needs with customizable access and security controls.

Sample Customers

Samsung, Toyota, Philips, Zeppelin, Western Union, eBay

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

812,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.