Nintex Process Platform vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Nintex and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while OpenText is ranked #40. Nintex holds a 2.1% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

3,238 Views
1,844 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText MBPM

Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews

355 Views
197 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

OpenText MBPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and OpenText MBPM are competitors in the business process management sector. Nintex holds an advantage in ease of use and integration, while OpenText offers a more robust feature set and scalability.

Features: Nintex Process Platform provides no-code development, seamless integration with Microsoft Office 365, and enhances workflows for businesses in the Microsoft ecosystem. OpenText MBPM includes advanced process automation, analytics capabilities, and supports deep customization with comprehensive process reports. The main contrast is simplicity in Nintex versus feature depth in OpenText.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex Process Platform offers straightforward deployment, especially in Microsoft environments, and readily available customer support. OpenText MBPM requires more initial configuration for deployment but offers extensive support resources and dedicated account management for larger implementations. Nintex focuses on easy integration, while OpenText emphasizes personalized onboarding experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform is cost-effective, with a lower entry price that appeals to small and medium businesses aiming for rapid ROI through quick deployment. OpenText MBPM, with a higher initial cost, provides significant long-term ROI for enterprises utilizing its extensive process management and reporting capabilities. Nintex is advantageous for smaller budgets, whereas OpenText addresses larger organizational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (8th), Workload Automation (11th)

OpenText MBPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

40th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.1%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText MBPM is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Damilola Adeleye

Business Automation Developer at Polaris Bank Nigeria Plc

Straightforward interface and user-friendly

There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at Avaali

A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation

I think the solution's support could do a better job. I rate the support somewhere around four and five out of ten. There is a hoard of people that they get in touch with while contacting them. So we've done some work with them in the past. I mean, we've been a support partner for a while. But apart from that, in terms of understanding the issues for a particular technology, I think there is a lack of people at their end. So they don't really have many people with them. And by the time we could get hold of the right person, especially for production issues, it's a little too late.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Allows to use workflow for simple approvals and LazyApproval. The feature is easy to implement for mobile approval."

"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."

"The capacity to integrate with external platforms. It's great to be able to call web services or other external services."

"This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly."

"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."

"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."

"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."

"K2 is reasonably priced."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

Cons

"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."

"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."

"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."

"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."

"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."

"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."

"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."

"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."

"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

15%

Insurance Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText MBPM?

On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText MBPM?

There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part. However, support is a major area that needs improvement. In general, the technical documentation isn't available to start wi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OpenText MBPM?

We use OpenText MBPM for business process management and vendor invoice management. There are a lot of other variations as well. So we don't just use it for automation. Primarily, we get informatio...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 29% of the time

Appian vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Appian vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText MBPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

January 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

December 2024

Download OpenText MBPM product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Metastorm BPM

Learn More

Nintex

OpenText

Overview

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

January 2025

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.