Nintex Process Platform vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Nintex and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #39. Nintex holds a 2.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,683 Views
2,066 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText MBPM

Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews

440 Views
356 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

OpenText MBPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and OpenText MBPM are competitors in the business process management sector. Nintex holds an advantage in ease of use and integration, while OpenText offers a more robust feature set and scalability.

Features: Nintex Process Platform provides no-code development, seamless integration with Microsoft Office 365, and enhances workflows for businesses in the Microsoft ecosystem. OpenText MBPM includes advanced process automation, analytics capabilities, and supports deep customization with comprehensive process reports. The main contrast is simplicity in Nintex versus feature depth in OpenText.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex Process Platform offers straightforward deployment, especially in Microsoft environments, and readily available customer support. OpenText MBPM requires more initial configuration for deployment but offers extensive support resources and dedicated account management for larger implementations. Nintex focuses on easy integration, while OpenText emphasizes personalized onboarding experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform is cost-effective, with a lower entry price that appeals to small and medium businesses aiming for rapid ROI through quick deployment. OpenText MBPM, with a higher initial cost, provides significant long-term ROI for enterprises utilizing its extensive process management and reporting capabilities. Nintex is advantageous for smaller budgets, whereas OpenText addresses larger organizational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (11th), Workload Automation (13th)

OpenText MBPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

39th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.0%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText MBPM is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Vitor Medeiros

National Sales Director at Konica Minolta

Offers capacity to integrate with external platforms but technically difficult

There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms. When we need to develop the forms, we don't have much customization, and I think we need more flexibility there. It's technically difficult, but it would be great to be able to develop our own code and integrate it into the platform. We could then run our own code for specific actions and requests or even develop a page or form. So, if I can ask Nintex for something, it would be a way to integrate our own code for specific actions. When it comes to integration, it could have more options for custom requests.

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation

I think the solution's support could do a better job. I rate the support somewhere around four and five out of ten. There is a hoard of people that they get in touch with while contacting them. So we've done some work with them in the past. I mean, we've been a support partner for a while. But apart from that, in terms of understanding the issues for a particular technology, I think there is a lack of people at their end. So they don't really have many people with them. And by the time we could get hold of the right person, especially for production issues, it's a little too late.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."

"It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention."

"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."

"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."

"The technical support is very good."

"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."

"This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

Cons

"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."

"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."

"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."

"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."

"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."

"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."

"The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes."

"The security features for this solution need to be improved."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."

"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"The annual support costs are expensive."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

"There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Educational Organization

Government

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Insurance Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 18% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Appian vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 38% of the time

IBM Case Foundation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 32% of the time

Apache Airflow vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 30% of the time

More OpenText MBPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

June 2025

Download OpenText MBPM product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Metastorm BPM

Overview

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.

OpenText

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

July 2025

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.