Nintex Process Platform vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Nintex and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0, while OpenText is ranked #41. Nintex holds a 1.8% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 25 Nintex Process Platform reviews

6,140 Views
3,745 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText MBPM

Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews

1,348 Views
1,254 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

OpenText MBPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and OpenText MBPM are competitors in the business process management sector. Nintex holds an advantage in ease of use and integration, while OpenText offers a more robust feature set and scalability.

Features: Nintex Process Platform provides no-code development, seamless integration with Microsoft Office 365, and enhances workflows for businesses in the Microsoft ecosystem. OpenText MBPM includes advanced process automation, analytics capabilities, and supports deep customization with comprehensive process reports. The main contrast is simplicity in Nintex versus feature depth in OpenText.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex Process Platform offers straightforward deployment, especially in Microsoft environments, and readily available customer support. OpenText MBPM requires more initial configuration for deployment but offers extensive support resources and dedicated account management for larger implementations. Nintex focuses on easy integration, while OpenText emphasizes personalized onboarding experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform is cost-effective, with a lower entry price that appeals to small and medium businesses aiming for rapid ROI through quick deployment. OpenText MBPM, with a higher initial cost, provides significant long-term ROI for enterprises utilizing its extensive process management and reporting capabilities. Nintex is advantageous for smaller budgets, whereas OpenText addresses larger organizational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 907,372 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (18th), Workload Automation (21st)

OpenText MBPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

41st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText MBPM is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.8%
OpenText MBPM	0.9%
Other	97.3%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation

I think the solution's support could do a better job. I rate the support somewhere around four and five out of ten. There is a hoard of people that they get in touch with while contacting them. So we've done some work with them in the past. I mean, we've been a support partner for a while. But apart from that, in terms of understanding the issues for a particular technology, I think there is a lack of people at their end. So they don't really have many people with them. And by the time we could get hold of the right person, especially for production issues, it's a little too late.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."

"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."

"I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance."

"Being able to simply create workflows to handle business processes allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention."

"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."

"The capacity to integrate with external platforms. It's great to be able to call web services or other external services."

"The technical support is very good."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

"OpenText MBPM is a stable solution."

Cons

"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."

"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."

"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."

"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."

"I have used Pega and I feel that it offers more than the K2 solution, in terms of the latest technology."

"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."

"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."

"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."

"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"The annual support costs are expensive."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

907,372 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	26

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for K2?

Our organization is a fertilizer company where we develop workflows regarding processes occurring at the plant. Most of them are safety projects, and a few other projects include off-boarding proje...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

WorkflowGen vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

IBM BPM vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 12% of the time

Appian vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Process Automation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Case Foundation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 7% of the time

ServoStreams vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText MBPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

July 2026

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

July 2026

Download OpenText MBPM product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Metastorm BPM

Overview

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

OpenText MBPM is a comprehensive business process management tool designed to improve workflow efficiency and streamline operations. It offers robust capabilities for process automation and monitoring, catering to businesses looking for efficiency and productivity enhancements.

Known for its ability to transform business processes, OpenText MBPM delivers efficient workflow automation and detailed process monitoring. Its integration capabilities facilitate seamless operations across diverse enterprise systems, helping businesses innovate while maintaining compliance with industry standards. The platform provides customizable features that enhance operational efficiency, enabling organizations to adapt quickly to changing business requirements.

What are the key features of OpenText MBPM?

Process Automation: Streamlines complex workflows by automating repetitive tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with existing enterprise systems for improved collaboration.
Customizable Workflows: Provides tools to create tailored workflows that suit specific business processes.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers insights into process performance through detailed analytics.
Compliance Support: Ensures business processes align with regulatory requirements.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces manual labor and errors, leading to cost savings.
Scalability: Supports business growth without extensive reconfiguration.
Improved Compliance: Helps meet industry regulations, reducing risk.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides clear insights into process performance.
Faster Time-to-Market: Accelerates deployment of new processes and products.

OpenText MBPM is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing to streamline operations and ensure compliance. In finance, it automates loan processing, reducing approval times while maintaining compliance. Healthcare organizations use it to enhance patient care workflows, optimize resource allocation, and improve patient data management. In manufacturing, it aids in process optimization ensuring product quality and regulatory compliance.

OpenText

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

June 2026

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

907,372 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.