Nintex Process Platform vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Nintex and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.0, while OpenText is ranked #39. Nintex holds a 1.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 25 Nintex Process Platform reviews

3,243 Views
2,076 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText MBPM

Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews

767 Views
721 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

OpenText MBPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and OpenText MBPM are competitors in the business process management sector. Nintex holds an advantage in ease of use and integration, while OpenText offers a more robust feature set and scalability.

Features: Nintex Process Platform provides no-code development, seamless integration with Microsoft Office 365, and enhances workflows for businesses in the Microsoft ecosystem. OpenText MBPM includes advanced process automation, analytics capabilities, and supports deep customization with comprehensive process reports. The main contrast is simplicity in Nintex versus feature depth in OpenText.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex Process Platform offers straightforward deployment, especially in Microsoft environments, and readily available customer support. OpenText MBPM requires more initial configuration for deployment but offers extensive support resources and dedicated account management for larger implementations. Nintex focuses on easy integration, while OpenText emphasizes personalized onboarding experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform is cost-effective, with a lower entry price that appeals to small and medium businesses aiming for rapid ROI through quick deployment. OpenText MBPM, with a higher initial cost, provides significant long-term ROI for enterprises utilizing its extensive process management and reporting capabilities. Nintex is advantageous for smaller budgets, whereas OpenText addresses larger organizational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (22nd), Workload Automation (21st)

OpenText MBPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

39th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.6%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText MBPM is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.6%
OpenText MBPM	0.9%
Other	97.5%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation

I think the solution's support could do a better job. I rate the support somewhere around four and five out of ten. There is a hoard of people that they get in touch with while contacting them. So we've done some work with them in the past. I mean, we've been a support partner for a while. But apart from that, in terms of understanding the issues for a particular technology, I think there is a lack of people at their end. So they don't really have many people with them. And by the time we could get hold of the right person, especially for production issues, it's a little too late.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work, and its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."

"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."

"If you need to integrate into anything, K2 is very useful."

"K2 is reasonably priced."

"The technical support is very good."

"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."

"It is for process automation, and it saves a lot of time and resources."

"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"OpenText MBPM is a stable solution."

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

Cons

"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."

"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."

"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."

"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."

"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."

"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."

"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."

"The security features for this solution need to be improved."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."

"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"The product’s price is competitive compared to other vendors."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for K2?

Our organization is a fertilizer company where we develop workflows regarding processes occurring at the plant. Most of them are safety projects, and a few other projects include off-boarding proje...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Make vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

IBM Case Foundation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 11% of the time

Appian vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 10% of the time

IBM BPM vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Process Automation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText MBPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

March 2026

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

March 2026

Download OpenText MBPM product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Metastorm BPM

Overview

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.

OpenText

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

March 2026

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.