Nutanix AHV and VMware ESXi are prominent competitors in the virtualization space. Nutanix AHV seems to have the upper hand in cost-effectiveness due to its free licensing model, whereas VMware ESXi distinguishes itself with high availability and robust performance.
Features: Nutanix AHV provides free, integrated virtualization and excels in disaster recovery, storage, and cloud integration. It offers simplicity and manageability through a single-dashboard, built-in automation, and scalability. VMware ESXi is recognized for its high availability, vMotion, and comprehensive VM management, supporting robust performance features.
Room for Improvement: Nutanix AHV can improve application migration and technical support response time, alongside enhancing stability in VM boot options and software integration. VMware ESXi's main issues revolve around high costs and complex licensing, compounded by the Broadcom acquisition. Users call for simpler patching processes and more competitive pricing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nutanix AHV is noted for fast on-premises implementation and efficient technical support, offering real-time issue resolution. Though some response time complaints exist, the service is generally well-regarded. VMware ESXi provides flexible deployment options, including hybrid setups, but faces challenges with support speed and setup complexity after corporate changes.
Pricing and ROI: Nutanix AHV stands out for its cost-effectiveness, benefiting users with its license-free model and lower operational costs, enhancing ROI by reducing hardware needs and simplifying management. VMware ESXi, despite its strong features, is often perceived as expensive due to its licensing model, particularly post-Broadcom acquisition, impacting its ROI appeal.
Their engineers are excellent and provide great supportability.
They provide prompt and quality responses.
In the last three or four years, we did not require any support from VMware engineers, indicating its high reliability.
I rate the technical support from VMware as nine or ten out of ten.
Their technical support is good, and I am satisfied with it.
We can scale our systems easily without any downtime, making it a highly effective solution for dynamic environments.
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is very scalable; however, I might be underutilizing its capabilities.
My customers are highly satisfied with its scalability.
vCenter Server can manage up to 1,000 ESXi servers within a single UI interface, allowing extensive deployment and management capabilities.
The solution is scalable, allowing us to scale up or down regardless of infrastructure size.
Issues such as patch delays and the OVF format challenge affect its stability rating.
The solution is very stable.
I would give the stability a seven out of ten at the moment, primarily due to the issues I've had with updates.
ESXi is stable, and our business operations depend on it year after year.
This delay in patching creates risk, especially for government projects that require timely updates.
These menus often show options like host, memory, and disk, however, they fail to provide insight into what's happening.
Using Lenovo hardware seems problematic with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, which demands careful consideration during updates.
The cost of VMware ESXi is very high, especially after the acquisition by Broadcom, which led to price increases.
It's not cost-effective for small users and creates a gap for alternatives, while favoring larger clients.
Providing a mobile application for remote access to ESXi servers would be beneficial.
Other solutions like Citrix and VMware have seen a significant price increase, whereas Nutanix hasn't increased as dramatically.
This has been advantageous as it does not require additional licensing costs for the hypervisor, contributing to overall cost savings.
The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
The product is very cost-effective, though not fixed, as pricing tends to fluctuate over time.
Changes have made it cost-prohibitive for smaller users.
The pricing is expensive, with the cost for customers ranging from $10,000 to $20,000 yearly.
It is easier to manage than VMware in some ways, providing a good level of interaction.
The technology behind the backups is very efficient, enabling a reliable virtual environment.
As a level one or bare metal hypervisor, its unmatched scalability depends on underlying hardware, capable of managing large numbers of physical servers with one management platform.
Its capability to move virtual machines to physical machines is very efficient for our live environment.
All the features of VMware ESXi are very beneficial, particularly for virtualizing our infrastructure.
VMware ESXi serves as a hypervisor enabling virtualization by transforming physical servers into virtual infrastructures, supporting efficient server management, development, and production environments.
Organizations utilize VMware ESXi for its high availability and ability to host diverse workloads effectively. Known for stability and maturity, it efficiently handles server, networking, and storage demands, with integral features like vMotion and memory compression. ESXi integrates well with data center operations, allowing seamless resource allocation and virtual machine migration. Despite impressive capabilities, users encounter challenges with setup complexity, licensing costs, and technical support delays, leading some to explore different solutions.
What are the main features of VMware ESXi?Industries deploying VMware ESXi benefit in sectors requiring robust IT infrastructure, including finance, healthcare, and education. Its capability to support high availability and diverse workloads proves essential for critical applications, enhancing productivity and agility in dynamic environments.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
