Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Red Hat OpenShift vs VMware ESXi comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
Red Hat OpenShift customer service is praised for effectiveness but faces challenges with response times and documentation navigation.
Sentiment score
7.6
VMware ESXi support is generally reliable but faces occasional delays and quality issues post-Broadcom acquisition, especially initially.
We have dealt with many cases with Red Hat support, and while they eventually solve issues, it sometimes takes them a long time to reach a resolution, particularly with complex matters related to IBM Cloud.
In the last three or four years, we did not require any support from VMware engineers, indicating its high reliability.
I rate the technical support from VMware as nine or ten out of ten.
Customer service and support are good; they are reachable, and at times remote support suffices.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.9
Red Hat OpenShift needs enhanced documentation and improvements in user support, feature compatibility, security, and cross-cloud management.
Sentiment score
5.0
VMware ESXi is criticized post-Broadcom acquisition for high costs, complex setup, licensing challenges, and insufficient tech support.
Learning OpenShift requires complex infrastructure, needing vCenter integration, more advanced answers, active directory, and more expensive hardware.
It's not cost-effective for small users and creates a gap for alternatives, while favoring larger clients.
Providing a mobile application for remote access to ESXi servers would be beneficial.
The cost of VMware ESXi is very high, especially after the acquisition by Broadcom, which led to price increases.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Red Hat OpenShift excels in scalability, with efficient management and expansion, but costs may challenge smaller on-premise businesses.
Sentiment score
7.9
VMware ESXi is praised for vertical scalability and supports many virtual machines, though horizontal scalability needs improvement.
OpenShift's horizontal pod scaling is more effective and efficient than that used in Kubernetes, making it a superior choice for scalability.
vCenter Server can manage up to 1,000 ESXi servers within a single UI interface, allowing extensive deployment and management capabilities.
My customers are highly satisfied with its scalability.
The solution is scalable, allowing us to scale up or down regardless of infrastructure size.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.0
Red Hat OpenShift is pricey but offers value through scalability, support, and potential savings with enterprise agreements.
Sentiment score
5.0
VMware ESXi is costly with high initial and annual fees, exacerbated by pricing changes and subscription model challenges.
The cost of OpenShift is very high, particularly with the OpenShift Plus package, which includes many products and services.
The product is very cost-effective, though not fixed, as pricing tends to fluctuate over time.
The pricing is expensive, with the cost for customers ranging from $10,000 to $20,000 yearly.
Changes have made it cost-prohibitive for smaller users.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Red Hat OpenShift is recognized for its stability and maturity, though it demands high resources and has occasional minor issues.
Sentiment score
8.5
VMware ESXi is valued for its stability and reliability, with minor issues reported, making it ideal for business operations.
It provides better performance yet requires more resources compared to vanilla Kubernetes.
ESXi is stable, and our business operations depend on it year after year.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
OpenShift excels in security, scalability, automation, and integration, with powerful tools and features for efficient application management.
Sentiment score
8.2
VMware ESXi offers cost savings, high availability, seamless migration, easy integration, and centralized management with reliability and stability.
As a level one or bare metal hypervisor, its unmatched scalability depends on underlying hardware, capable of managing large numbers of physical servers with one management platform.
Its capability to move virtual machines to physical machines is very efficient for our live environment.
ESXi is a virtualization platform that allows multiple applications to run on the same physical hardware, reducing costs significantly by transforming physical servers into virtual environments.
 

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat OpenShift
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (3rd), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (6th)
VMware ESXi
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Mikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamlessly monitor microservices with streamlined DevOps capabilities
Most benefit from it, however, I work with Kubernetes, and installing Vanilla Kubernetes is easy. That said, it introduces many tools that need to be set up individually. OpenShift comes ready out of the box, with all tools installed and configured. Red Hat certifies and confirms that all the components are compatible with each other. OpenShift's superior dashboard is a notable strength, especially when compared to Kubernetes. The integrated DevOps capabilities, such as pipelines and the container registry, are extremely beneficial. Additionally, its capability to monitor microservices and containers with integrated tools like Prometheus is a major advantage. The horizontal pod scaling exceeds the scalability features I found in Kubernetes.
Syed Shahid Hasan - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable, is not affected by network issues, and provides good support
Most people do not know why VMware is more stable than Hyper-V. Our clients use Webex after version 6.5. Before, we installed VMware Client and connected to the vCenter server. The vCenter server was connected to the vCenter host. There were a lot of version and service issues with vCenter. Things have been better after we installed Webex. The cost is very important. We have to buy the latest hardware and licenses. The license is very costly. The vendor might discontinue the perpetual license. The tool will become more costly. Customers will leave VMware and choose Hyper-V. The vendor must rethink the price. We can learn to use the solution through YouTube videos. Beginners can use the tool, but we must learn and better know the product. It is a very good product. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?
Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...
Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?
Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...
What do you like most about OpenShift?
OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.
What do you like most about VMware ESXi?
My customers are satisfied with the solution’s performance.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware ESXi?
The pricing is expensive, with the cost for customers ranging from $10,000 to $20,000 yearly. The price rating is nine out of ten.
What needs improvement with VMware ESXi?
We often face issues with ESXi that require us to change resources by shutting down the VMs. Improving the efficiency of this feature for better scalability would enhance the product. Additionally,...
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat OpenShift vs. VMware ESXi and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.