OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management vs xMatters comparison

OnSolve and Everbridge are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. OnSolve is ranked #16, while Everbridge is ranked #10. OnSolve holds a 2.1% mindshare in IMS, compared to Everbridge’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Everbridge users are willing to recommend the solution.

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

Read 1 OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management review

663 Views
298 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

1,014 Views
811 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management and xMatters based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about PagerDuty, Splunk, Atlassian and others in IT Alerting and Incident Management.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Alerting and Incident Management Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,883 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

16th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mass Notification Software (2nd), Critical Event Management (CEM) (9th)

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management is 2.1%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 6.8%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
xMatters	6.8%
OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management	2.1%
Other	91.1%

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

it_user826692

Business Continuity Specialist at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location, but the user interface is too complicated

Emergency alerting for a global company in 14 countries It allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location. It has the same general functions as most emergency alerting systems. The placeholder dropdowns for message templates are useful. The user interface is…

Read full review

Dean-Robinson

Sr. Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

A versatile solution with excellent logging capabilities that reduced our time to resolve

The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes. There are a couple of improvements that xMatters could make to the incident hub, where we can manage high-priority incidents. More sharing capability between collaborating incident managers would be good to see, including the ability to whiteboard. That would allow them to share and sketch out ideas while looking for a solution. Those two features are essential, and that's why we want to use the solution in conjunction with Everbridge because xMatters doesn't have them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location."

"The placeholder dropdowns for message templates are useful."

"The UI: It is easily navigable."

"xMatters is helpful for getting the right on-call resources. That is a key factor. It is also very user-friendly, and just a little documentation helps you to understand things such as how on-calls are configured, how groups are configured, and how users update their on-call devices."

"The on-call schedule that they have for groups is amazing in terms of how it works and how it triggers. You don't need to do anything. You just upload the users, and you have the calendar of the schedules. It is amazing how it works and how easy it is to work with this feature."

"People are able to go in and update their contact information and even set things like when they're going to be on vacation and who their backup is."

"The most valuable feature is getting alerts out to my user base. xMatters is the only solution that I know that has robust scheduling, calendaring for groups, and that provides very good delineation of who gets alerted and on which devices they receive their alerts."

"It has improved our time to respond. Prior to the use of xMatters, it might take hours or even a day to get someone involved on a problem. Now, it's down to minutes."

"The feature that I have found to be most valuable is the entire alert notification configuration, having an external system to trigger events that will process the alert to the supporting team. If a system is down, then you need to get it attention. Sometimes, it cannot wait until the next day. Therefore, how xMatters provides this type of integration is critical."

"Simple features create flow sets and build APIs for integrations."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"Conference calling requires a complicated syntax formula."

"The user interface is too complicated and aspects that should be offered, such as email subject line editing, are not."

"It took me awhile to get used to whatever was available in the interface. The interface from two years ago was a bit more confusing when looking at where you should go"

"I've asked for the ability to have tags on groups, and for dynamic lists, meaning the ability to pull data from another location and use it in xMatters dynamically. Right now, for example, if I have a form and want to populate a list, it's a manual process. I have to copy and paste the list items."

"When you are not using the conference bridge from xMatters and you are using an external one, it is a little bit hard to get the person whom xMatters calls to jump directly to the external bridge. They need to hang up the phone and then get to the email to get the URL so that they can jump on the bridge. There is no direct connection from xMatters to that external bridge, but I understand that part of the business."

"We have to create an Excel sheet for onboarding users and then upload it. But if an employee resigns, we don't have any checkpoints to validate whether the user is still active or not. We have to do that manually every week: Check who has left the organization, and do a cross-check, whether this person had any licenses or signed in to xMatters."

"Beyond the typical grouping, xMatters has what is referred to as dynamic teams. Dynamic teams are criteria for setting up and targeting a group of people that meet specific criteria. The bad thing about this setup is that you cannot alter those criteria through the typical xMatters import/export process. The attributes that create the criteria for dynamic teams can only be altered via the Web UI. So, if you want to create a new dynamic team in a mature xMatters environment (one that is already populated with hundreds of users), and you want to add, say, 100 users to that dynamic team, you have to do it manually."

"We have had outages with the product. We have experienced functionality (defects), such as conference bridges can only be opened for four hours at a time and people get kicked out."

"We would like to see a greater variety of integrations with ServiceNow. It works fine as it is, but an enhancement would be the ability to interact with the major incident module in ServiceNow... The way our major incident process works, when an incident is elevated from a P1 to a major incident, that is an extra flag in ServiceNow. It would be awesome to have xMatters get notification when something goes from a P1 to a major and then have it go through a different workflow, rather than our regular P1."

"In terms of intuitiveness and flexibility of xMatters when it comes to customizing on-call schedules, rotations, and escalations, for me, as an IT professional, setting it up isn't that big of a deal, but I understand that some people struggle with it because when you get wrapped up into it. You can get lost. It's not super complex, but it's complicated enough to the point where you can say that you should have done it another way. The shift part can be confusing for some people. In that respect, one of the shortcomings my team has found is when we have to add another person, such as a new hire, to xMatters, we can't add them to a group within xMatters without having to put them on a shift. If we put them in a group, they have to be on-call. We can create their account, and then they're just out there in limbo until their team says, "You have to be on this shift." One piece of feedback for xMatters is to figure out how to have manageable groups so that they're contactable from xMatters. They do not necessarily have to be on a shift right from the start or at all for that matter."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I don't make the decisions on the cost aspect. We haven't had any complaints. I think it has a reasonable price."

"The cost depends very much on the company's size and usage. We're a very high use case compared to many companies, so we had to consider licensing costs carefully. If we added all our users, that would be 30,000, and that's no good; we wouldn't have been able to afford it. For example, we had to put in customization to sync across on-call users. For the license per user, the price is very reasonable and comparable to ServiceNow when factoring in everything that needs to get up and running."

"I know roughly what we pay per year. For what we use it for and what its purpose is, it is very valuable."

"Cost is probably my biggest concern. I know the solution was recently acquired by Everbridge, and Everbridge was one of the competitors that was included in our RFP five years ago. Everbridge's costs were astronomical compared to where every other solution was, not just xMatters."

"Then, in pricing, you are limited on your number of SMS messages that you can send a month and the licensing cost annually."

"The only potential concern is professional services. They are capable, but like to bill on an hourly basis."

"It feels like good value in the sense that the service is excellent. The people above me who look at such things have renewed it a couple of times, and I think they would have thought whether it was good value, whether it was wildly overpriced, or whether there were better and cheaper alternatives. So, from that perspective, the pricing is fair and proper."

"This is a subscription-based, SaaS solution."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,883 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

30%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Comparisons

Everbridge Mass Notification vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 38% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 27% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 19% of the time

AlertMedia vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 16% of the time

More OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management Competitors

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters

Compared 49% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters

Compared 26% of the time

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 17% of the time

ServiceNow vs xMatters

Compared 9% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

October 2025

OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management report

Download OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

September 2025

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

Send Word Now, OnSolve MIR3, OnSolve CodeRED, OnSolve SmartNotice, OnSolve TelAlert

xMatters IT Management

Overview

The OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management is a comprehensive solution designed to help organizations effectively manage critical events. Its primary use case is to provide real-time situational awareness, enabling organizations to proactively respond to and mitigate potential threats.

The platform offers a range of valuable functionality, including event monitoring, alerting, and incident management. It aggregates data from various sources, such as social media, weather updates, and internal systems, to provide a holistic view of the current situation. This allows organizations to quickly assess the impact of an event and take appropriate actions.

The platform also enables automated alerting and notification, ensuring timely dissemination of critical information to relevant stakeholders. It supports multi-channel communication, including SMS, voice calls, emails, and mobile app notifications, to reach individuals across different devices and locations. This helps organizations rapidly communicate with employees, customers, and other key stakeholders during emergencies.

Furthermore, the platform facilitates incident management by providing tools for task assignment, collaboration, and tracking. It allows organizations to create response plans, allocate resources, and monitor progress in real-time. This streamlines the incident response process, leading to faster resolution and reduced impact on operations.

OnSolve

xMatters, an Everbridge company, is a service reliability platform that helps DevOps, SREs, and operations teams rapidly deliver products at scale by automating workflows and ensuring infrastructure and applications are always working. The xMatters code-free workflow builder, adaptive approach to incident management, and real-time performance analytics all support a single goal: deliver customer happiness.

To learn more, request a demo.

Reliable services, rapid innovation: Automate operations workflows, ensure applications are always working, and deliver remarkable products at scale with the xMatters service reliability platform.

Automate on the xMatters service reliability platform: Move faster with confidence. Our no-code and low-code integrations let you build flexible workflows to address issues proactively—even during deployments.

Frictionless on-call: Manage on-call seamlessly. Automatically escalate to the right people, schedule with ease, and act on detailed alerts from anywhere.

Adaptive Incident Management: Stay resilient in any scenario with our adaptive approach to incident management. Automate resolution, protect customers from disruptions, and learn from each event.

Signal Intelligence: Put situations in context and cut through the noise of multiple monitoring tools with filtering and suppression, alert correlation, enriched notifications, and routing based on role or function.

Actionable Analytics: Get quick insights into key metrics to understand inefficiencies, boosting collaboration and productivity across engineering and operations teams.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

Gift of Life Michigan, The Salvation Army Greater New York Division, PR Newswire, Carnival Group, The United Network for Organ Sharing, Virgin Atlantic, University of Delaware, NetApp, CME Group

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

October 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about PagerDuty, Splunk, Atlassian and others in IT Alerting and Incident Management. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,883 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.