OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management vs xMatters comparison

OnSolve and Everbridge are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. OnSolve is ranked #13, while Everbridge is ranked #9. OnSolve holds a 3.8% mindshare in IMS, compared to Everbridge’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Everbridge users are willing to recommend the solution.

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

Read 1 OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management review

373 Views
235 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

830 Views
472 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management and xMatters based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about PagerDuty, Atlassian, Splunk and others in IT Alerting and Incident Management.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Alerting and Incident Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OnSolve Platform for Critic...

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

13th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mass Notification Software (2nd), Critical Event Management (CEM) (2nd)

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management is 3.8%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 6.0%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

it_user826692

Business Continuity Specialist at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location, but the user interface is too complicated

Emergency alerting for a global company in 14 countries It allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location. It has the same general functions as most emergency alerting systems. The placeholder dropdowns for message templates are useful. The user interface is…

Read full review

Dean-Robinson

Sr. Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

A versatile solution with excellent logging capabilities that reduced our time to resolve

The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes. There are a couple of improvements that xMatters could make to the incident hub, where we can manage high-priority incidents. More sharing capability between collaborating incident managers would be good to see, including the ability to whiteboard. That would allow them to share and sketch out ideas while looking for a solution. Those two features are essential, and that's why we want to use the solution in conjunction with Everbridge because xMatters doesn't have them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The placeholder dropdowns for message templates are useful."

"It allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location."

"We use xMatters for alarming infrastructure outages and failures of batch jobs (post-processing)."

"We're able to communicate better with specific groups or offices. We didn't have that capability or granularity before. It has helped in that regard."

"The feature that I have found to be most valuable is the entire alert notification configuration, having an external system to trigger events that will process the alert to the supporting team. If a system is down, then you need to get it attention. Sometimes, it cannot wait until the next day. Therefore, how xMatters provides this type of integration is critical."

"It reduces the mean time to restore a service. Before, it would probably take an hour to get everybody settled down. With the integrations right now, if somebody flags a major incident, then everyone is on a call in the next 15 minutes."

"Being SaaS-based is a plus. Regardless of the state of our network or infrastructure, xMatters will still be available via a mobile device."

"Having our users manage their own notification devices within xMatters is huge, since it takes the burden off our datacenter."

"Made it very easy to implement our roster of people who receive alarms with the REST API."

"Workflows and messaging are most valuable. Workflows are very useful. They are important for consolidating information or stopping duplication from happening. We put all the information into xMatters and then the workflow will push the same information in the correct format directly through to other applications that our end users frequently use, such as Slack, email, and Workplace."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"Conference calling requires a complicated syntax formula."

"The user interface is too complicated and aspects that should be offered, such as email subject line editing, are not."

"When you are not using the conference bridge from xMatters and you are using an external one, it is a little bit hard to get the person whom xMatters calls to jump directly to the external bridge. They need to hang up the phone and then get to the email to get the URL so that they can jump on the bridge. There is no direct connection from xMatters to that external bridge, but I understand that part of the business."

"We would like to see the ability to support custom devices. We have a lot of users who use Slack, which is another tool for communication. xMatters currently does not support Slack as a communication method. It can't send events to Slack and respond to them."

"We would like to see a greater variety of integrations with ServiceNow. It works fine as it is, but an enhancement would be the ability to interact with the major incident module in ServiceNow... The way our major incident process works, when an incident is elevated from a P1 to a major incident, that is an extra flag in ServiceNow. It would be awesome to have xMatters get notification when something goes from a P1 to a major and then have it go through a different workflow, rather than our regular P1."

"It took me awhile to get used to whatever was available in the interface. The interface from two years ago was a bit more confusing when looking at where you should go"

"It has not improved our organization."

"On-call management scheduling is difficult."

"The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes."

"Beyond the typical grouping, xMatters has what is referred to as dynamic teams. Dynamic teams are criteria for setting up and targeting a group of people that meet specific criteria. The bad thing about this setup is that you cannot alter those criteria through the typical xMatters import/export process. The attributes that create the criteria for dynamic teams can only be altered via the Web UI. So, if you want to create a new dynamic team in a mature xMatters environment (one that is already populated with hundreds of users), and you want to add, say, 100 users to that dynamic team, you have to do it manually."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is too high... we procured 150 licenses and we have almost 1,500 users in IT. We had to come up with a few ideas for determining which users get a license and which users don't need one. Due to the limitation of the number of licenses, we were unable to integrate the user profiles with Active Directory."

"It seemed comparable or more reasonable than some of the other solutions, at least when we evaluated it. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. Its cost is good, given the breadth of features provided by xMatters."

"I know roughly what we pay per year. For what we use it for and what its purpose is, it is very valuable."

"Licensing varies widely, depending on usage. It can be cheap or quite expensive, depending on volume and features."

"You pay for the user, not the number of alerts. Therefore, xMatters provides a better ROI, if you can leverage it for notifications based on alerts from other monitoring tools. "

"Pricing is pretty straightforward and listed on their website. I recommend starting small and expanding later."

"The cost depends very much on the company's size and usage. We're a very high use case compared to many companies, so we had to consider licensing costs carefully. If we added all our users, that would be 30,000, and that's no good; we wouldn't have been able to afford it. For example, we had to put in customization to sync across on-call users. For the license per user, the price is very reasonable and comparable to ServiceNow when factoring in everything that needs to get up and running."

"There's a significant difference between a full license, which allows people to respond to and acknowledge receipt of messages, and a more scaled-down license, which just allows people to see the notification. So we need to evaluate what license they need when onboarding new users because the full license is significantly more expensive."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

11%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

32%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Everbridge Mass Notification vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 47% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 23% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 17% of the time

AlertMedia vs OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management

Compared 13% of the time

More OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management Competitors

Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters

Compared 33% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters

Compared 31% of the time

ServiceNow vs xMatters

Compared 21% of the time

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 15% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

April 2025

OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management report

Download OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

March 2025

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

Send Word Now, OnSolve MIR3, OnSolve CodeRED, OnSolve SmartNotice, OnSolve TelAlert

xMatters IT Management

Overview

The OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management is a comprehensive solution designed to help organizations effectively manage critical events. Its primary use case is to provide real-time situational awareness, enabling organizations to proactively respond to and mitigate potential threats.

The platform offers a range of valuable functionality, including event monitoring, alerting, and incident management. It aggregates data from various sources, such as social media, weather updates, and internal systems, to provide a holistic view of the current situation. This allows organizations to quickly assess the impact of an event and take appropriate actions.

The platform also enables automated alerting and notification, ensuring timely dissemination of critical information to relevant stakeholders. It supports multi-channel communication, including SMS, voice calls, emails, and mobile app notifications, to reach individuals across different devices and locations. This helps organizations rapidly communicate with employees, customers, and other key stakeholders during emergencies.

Furthermore, the platform facilitates incident management by providing tools for task assignment, collaboration, and tracking. It allows organizations to create response plans, allocate resources, and monitor progress in real-time. This streamlines the incident response process, leading to faster resolution and reduced impact on operations.

OnSolve

xMatters, an Everbridge company, is a service reliability platform that helps DevOps, SREs, and operations teams rapidly deliver products at scale by automating workflows and ensuring infrastructure and applications are always working. The xMatters code-free workflow builder, adaptive approach to incident management, and real-time performance analytics all support a single goal: deliver customer happiness.

To learn more, request a demo.

Reliable services, rapid innovation: Automate operations workflows, ensure applications are always working, and deliver remarkable products at scale with the xMatters service reliability platform.

Automate on the xMatters service reliability platform: Move faster with confidence. Our no-code and low-code integrations let you build flexible workflows to address issues proactively—even during deployments.

Frictionless on-call: Manage on-call seamlessly. Automatically escalate to the right people, schedule with ease, and act on detailed alerts from anywhere.

Adaptive Incident Management: Stay resilient in any scenario with our adaptive approach to incident management. Automate resolution, protect customers from disruptions, and learn from each event.

Signal Intelligence: Put situations in context and cut through the noise of multiple monitoring tools with filtering and suppression, alert correlation, enriched notifications, and routing based on role or function.

Actionable Analytics: Get quick insights into key metrics to understand inefficiencies, boosting collaboration and productivity across engineering and operations teams.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

Gift of Life Michigan, The Salvation Army Greater New York Division, PR Newswire, Carnival Group, The United Network for Organ Sharing, Virgin Atlantic, University of Delaware, NetApp, CME Group

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

IT Alerting and Incident Management

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about PagerDuty, Atlassian, Splunk and others in IT Alerting and Incident Management. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.