Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters comparison

Everbridge IT Alerting and xMatters are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. Everbridge IT Alerting is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while xMatters is ranked #11. Everbridge IT Alerting holds a 5.7% mindshare in IMS, compared to xMatters’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Everbridge IT Alerting users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of xMatters users who would recommend it.

Everbridge IT Alerting

Read 23 Everbridge IT Alerting reviews

1,533 Views
981 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

1,177 Views
989 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Everbridge IT Alerting

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Everbridge IT Alerting and xMatters compete in IT alerting. xMatters is preferred for its feature-rich platform, whereas Everbridge is chosen for affordability and support.

Features: Everbridge provides robust communication tools and reliable notifications critical for effective incident management. It also excels in mass notification and calendar integration. xMatters is notable for advanced automation, integration with ITSM solutions, and a flexible workflow management system.

Room for Improvement: Everbridge could enhance its integration capabilities with newer platforms and refine user interface intuitiveness. More customization options and advanced analytics would benefit users. xMatters would benefit from simplifying its initial setup process. Enhancing real-time reporting, UI intuitiveness, and extending API capabilities could provide additional value.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Everbridge offers straightforward deployment ideal for organizations needing immediate functionality, backed by extensive customer support. xMatters provides a customizable setup allowing tailored workflows and is supported by dedicated customer assistance, catering to diverse organizational needs.

Pricing and ROI: Everbridge stands out with cost-effective pricing suitable for budget-conscious organizations, ensuring good value. xMatters, although requiring a higher initial investment, delivers significant ROI with superior features and process enhancements, justified for businesses seeking advanced capabilities and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,282 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Everbridge IT Alerting

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of Everbridge IT Alerting is 5.7%, down from 11.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 5.8%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Everbridge IT Alerting	5.7%
xMatters	5.8%
Other	88.5%

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1846215

Crisis Management Director at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Helps in identifying potential impact and allows us to see where our assets are in relation to a risk event

I personally love VCC because I just think there needs to be more data to support it so we can be more proactive and easily assess the impact. So, I appreciate the visual aspect, but it has to have the data to support it. It has proved very useful, particularly because we have a GSOC that's not technically 24/7. We do have an 800 number that people call 24/7. If something happens, they can easily send Everbridge a notification to activate the team off hours. It is useful in that respect too. We use it in conjunction with teams, but off-hours and for additional people outside of the core team, we use Everbridge, which is useful.

Read full review

reviewer1855452

Infrastructure Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Helps in ensuring that everyone gets notified when needed, and provides the flexibility to integrate it and build what we want on top of it

They recently released an incident module that allows users, or at least teams, to track major incidents and other things, and you can send out communication via that one webpage. You can engage on-call teams and communicate to stakeholders as well, but one thing that is missing there is a group chat. If there is a group chat on the same webpage that all of the support teams could use, it would be a one-stop shop that all of the major incident managers would use as their product to manage a major incident. Without that, at the moment, they are mainly referring to teams and then adding data into xMatters as and when they can. Some of the workflow development work that we do for the in-house piece can be quite complicated if you don't have experience using the tool. You have to have to go through the documentation, but I suppose that's an expectation. When users first log on and they're configuring the rotas, it does take them a bit of time to get their heads around how to configure the shifts. Some of them do need guidance. We have got a support document, and xMatters also has a support page where they can go and read through the details. Our roles and access for each user are locked down, as opposed to just letting them access the xMatters portal because it can add more confusion because the support portal explains that they can do X, Y, and Z. So, we're removing that ability, but once the users get their head around how to configure the rotas, the overall intuitiveness of the UI is pretty good. It is simple and clean, and they don't have to do that many steps. There are probably one or two group supervisors that configure the rotas, and the rest of them log on. We've already pre-populated the contact details from our directory, so usually, they'll just go and add a personal device, if they do want to get called on a personal device, or they want to set up the app, which is pretty easy using the QR codes. The product looks nice and clean. The only thing is that it takes a little bit of work to get your head around the rotas, but once you do, it's pretty darn simple.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It just runs. I do not think we have had a single outage; nothing. There has not been a single issue with it in the time that we have had it running. It just works."

"Our performance showed us that, for major incidents, we spent over 40 minutes just making manual call-outs. That is why we implement the tool in the first place and that time has been cut down to two or three minutes."

"By leveraging Everbridge, with a few clicks of a mouse, we are able to go in and request as many teams as we require to respond to an incident and bring them together to collaborate much faster."

"It's mainly for mass notification and pooling of contacts. Pooling of customers is valuable."

"Valuable features include incident management and ease of integrations."

"A robust solution with multiple modules that can be leveraged."

"With SaaS, we can implement in other regions without having to physically go to there."

"We have been able to use it to track and verify that people are on the bridge."

More Everbridge IT Alerting pros

"For us, their biggest feature is event alerting and the retention of those events. This way, if something goes wrong, we can provide a report of everything that was sent out and everything that was captured."

"Its ease of use and self-service are important to me. It's very easy for users to go in and modify their own contact information, for managers to go in and manage their own on-call rotations and shifts."

"The automated callouts, without a doubt, are most valuable. They have been a huge gain for our company. Previous to xMatters, there was no real management of the on-call resources or rotas. So, having that centralized and automated has been a huge gain."

"Allows us to define scenarios that notify only the necessary people when we need to open a conference bridge."

"Simple features create flow sets and build APIs for integrations."

"The on-call schedule that they have for groups is amazing in terms of how it works and how it triggers. You don't need to do anything. You just upload the users, and you have the calendar of the schedules. It is amazing how it works and how easy it is to work with this feature."

"Probably the most important one is that it persists in attempting to contact to someone until someone is engaged on the event."

"It reduces the mean time to restore a service. Before, it would probably take an hour to get everybody settled down. With the integrations right now, if somebody flags a major incident, then everyone is on a call in the next 15 minutes."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"The initial setup was very complex. We did not have a very good experience with our initial deployment. Most of this was due to customizations in our ServiceNow instance."

"Explanations are limited to 500 characters in description fields."

"An incident management feature would be nice because, as it stands now, you select different items when you're filling out a form to launch a notification. If those were more conditional it would help. Right now it just puts out whatever you put into the form, whereas, if you could specify a "yes" or "no" and it would input a different verbiage, that would be nice to have, instead of having to spell out all the verbiage."

"The ability for members to change their schedules, and change the person their swapping with, could use improvement. The GUI is a little tough to navigate. It's not very straightforward when someone is trying to change schedules."

"I've worked closely with Everbridge teams in my previous positions too, and the one thing I would like to see is the distance. You have to measure it, and it's not really accurate. If we could have a general distance within the alert itself to tell us where the closest asset is, it would be useful. That's one thing I'd like to see."

"I would like them to add GPS going forward."

"The incident templates can get complex and hard to troubleshoot, so it helps to focus on keeping it simple."

"I know that we get frustrated at the capacity of SMS messages. It's not very long, and if you want to send a long message, they end up sending you a link to the rest of the message."

More Everbridge IT Alerting cons

"The REST API is still missing some important functionality, which we require."

"The data validation and verification need to be enhanced so that when data is changed, it reviews it in an automated manner and catches all of the anomalies."

"We would like to see the integration between our ITSM solution and xMatters."

"Reporting is the weakest point of xMatters. Since xMatters has very limited reporting and only maintains logs of events for a short period of time, we export event and conference logs to our ITSM solution."

"I've asked for the ability to have tags on groups, and for dynamic lists, meaning the ability to pull data from another location and use it in xMatters dynamically. Right now, for example, if I have a form and want to populate a list, it's a manual process. I have to copy and paste the list items."

"An additional knowledge-sharing program could be helpful and part of the demo workshops (right now, these only provide partial information)."

"When you are not using the conference bridge from xMatters and you are using an external one, it is a little bit hard to get the person whom xMatters calls to jump directly to the external bridge. They need to hang up the phone and then get to the email to get the URL so that they can jump on the bridge. There is no direct connection from xMatters to that external bridge, but I understand that part of the business."

"On-call management scheduling is difficult."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a seven out of ten for us in terms of pricing. We've just gone through a process of looking at other solutions."

"The annual cost is $125,000 USD. That is for everything. It includes the 11,000 mass notifications. Technically, we have 500 licenses for IT Alerting."

"We thought the base product was pretty reasonable. It can pricey once you start adding stuff on."

"The current pricing model is adequate. We feel that the pricing model for our IT Alerting solution is competitive with similar solutions on the market."

"Everbridge is not an inexpensive tool, but as the adage says, you get what you pay for."

"This product has helped us save $200,000 from being able to get rid of vendors and consolidate functionalities to doing incident reporting."

"The end result is that we have driven down our MTTR by an average of about 45 minutes across all major outages. That is very substantial considering the cost of every minute of outage can be thousands of dollars lost."

"For the one-way license, which refers to someone is just on the receiving end, it's very affordable. I was actually surprised that it was a really good price. The two-way license, like an on-call resource who is actually going to be in a calendar and be paged, it is a bit more expensive, but for the gains that we've realized, it's certainly worth the price."

More Everbridge IT Alerting pricing and cost advice

"It feels like good value in the sense that the service is excellent. The people above me who look at such things have renewed it a couple of times, and I think they would have thought whether it was good value, whether it was wildly overpriced, or whether there were better and cheaper alternatives. So, from that perspective, the pricing is fair and proper."

"We're currently per license. We're paying around $44,000 per year for 80 full users and 300 standard users. For a new implementation, we also need to pay for an expert."

"The cost depends very much on the company's size and usage. We're a very high use case compared to many companies, so we had to consider licensing costs carefully. If we added all our users, that would be 30,000, and that's no good; we wouldn't have been able to afford it. For example, we had to put in customization to sync across on-call users. For the license per user, the price is very reasonable and comparable to ServiceNow when factoring in everything that needs to get up and running."

"xMatters is pricey, but you have to consider what a critical incident costs your organization."

"This is our biggest issue: licensing. Our customer has only purchased a set number of full licensed users, and we are constantly running up against our license limit. To mitigate licensing concerns, we completely control at the admin level user additions and removals, and do a monthly cleanup process driven by security contractor removal reports."

"The only potential concern is professional services. They are capable, but like to bill on an hourly basis."

"There's a significant difference between a full license, which allows people to respond to and acknowledge receipt of messages, and a more scaled-down license, which just allows people to see the notification. So we need to evaluate what license they need when onboarding new users because the full license is significantly more expensive."

"Then, in pricing, you are limited on your number of SMS messages that you can send a month and the licensing cost annually."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Everbridge IT Alerting?

Everbridge IT Alerting is a cost-efficient solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Everbridge IT Alerting?

The solution's non-targeted communication with external parties could be enhanced.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Everbridge IT Alerting?

We are using Everbridge IT Alerting for incident and crisis modules. The tool is powerful in itself, but as with any tool, you need to adapt it to the organization to be suitable for managing speci...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs Everbridge IT Alerting

Compared 23% of the time

OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management vs Everbridge IT Alerting

Compared 11% of the time

HPE OneView vs Everbridge IT Alerting

Compared 11% of the time

ServiceNow vs Everbridge IT Alerting

Compared 10% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Everbridge IT Alerting

Compared 7% of the time

More Everbridge IT Alerting Competitors

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters

Compared 41% of the time

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 22% of the time

ServiceNow vs xMatters

Compared 7% of the time

Rootly vs xMatters

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk On-Call vs xMatters

Compared 5% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Everbridge IT Alerting

January 2026

Download Everbridge IT Alerting product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

January 2026

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

No data available

xMatters IT Management

Overview

Everbridge IT Alerting is a closed-loop cyber security and incident response automation solution that helps organizations respond to IT Incidents faster and improve teams’ response performance by automating communication, collaboration, and orchestration processes for ServiceOps, IT Security Ops, DevOps, and Disaster Recovery Ops. As a FedRamp-certified solution, IT Alerting capabilities include in-depth scheduling/calendars, interactive & analytical reporting, on-call scheduling, automated escalation, response workflow automation, recording, and much more. The solution is offered as a cloud service based on the secure, highly available, resilient, and globally scalable Everbridge CEM platform.

Learn why 5,400+ enterprise customers trust Everbridge (NASDAQ (EVBG)) with their IT Response Automation Management and IT Alerting solutions; visit ITAlerting.com to learn more or request a demo.

Need Integration with your ITOM, ITSM, SIEM tools?

Plug Everbridge IT Alerting directly into your ITOM, ITSM, SIEM, IT Monitoring tools including ServiceNow or BMC Remedy with our certified, two-way integrations and automatically contact the on-call IT team members, launch conference bridges and automatically escalate to the senior personnel in case of major IT incidents.

Everbridge

xMatters, an Everbridge company, is a service reliability platform that helps DevOps, SREs, and operations teams rapidly deliver products at scale by automating workflows and ensuring infrastructure and applications are always working. The xMatters code-free workflow builder, adaptive approach to incident management, and real-time performance analytics all support a single goal: deliver customer happiness.

To learn more, request a demo.

Reliable services, rapid innovation: Automate operations workflows, ensure applications are always working, and deliver remarkable products at scale with the xMatters service reliability platform.

Automate on the xMatters service reliability platform: Move faster with confidence. Our no-code and low-code integrations let you build flexible workflows to address issues proactively—even during deployments.

Frictionless on-call: Manage on-call seamlessly. Automatically escalate to the right people, schedule with ease, and act on detailed alerts from anywhere.

Adaptive Incident Management: Stay resilient in any scenario with our adaptive approach to incident management. Automate resolution, protect customers from disruptions, and learn from each event.

Signal Intelligence: Put situations in context and cut through the noise of multiple monitoring tools with filtering and suppression, alert correlation, enriched notifications, and routing based on role or function.

Actionable Analytics: Get quick insights into key metrics to understand inefficiencies, boosting collaboration and productivity across engineering and operations teams.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

Choice Hotels, Alexion, Navy Federal Credit Union, EastWest Bank, IBM, Core Logic, Paypal, Charter Communications, Lowes, Express Scripts, Finastra, Worldpay

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters

December 2025

Free Report: Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters

Find out what your peers are saying about Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters report.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.