Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters comparison

Everbridge IT Alerting and xMatters are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. Everbridge IT Alerting is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while xMatters is ranked #11. Everbridge IT Alerting holds a 5.7% mindshare in IMS, compared to xMatters’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Everbridge IT Alerting users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of xMatters users who would recommend it.

Everbridge IT Alerting

Read 23 Everbridge IT Alerting reviews

1,667 Views
1,084 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

1,375 Views
1,169 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Everbridge IT Alerting

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Everbridge IT Alerting and xMatters compete in IT alerting. xMatters is preferred for its feature-rich platform, whereas Everbridge is chosen for affordability and support.

Features: Everbridge provides robust communication tools and reliable notifications critical for effective incident management. It also excels in mass notification and calendar integration. xMatters is notable for advanced automation, integration with ITSM solutions, and a flexible workflow management system.

Room for Improvement: Everbridge could enhance its integration capabilities with newer platforms and refine user interface intuitiveness. More customization options and advanced analytics would benefit users. xMatters would benefit from simplifying its initial setup process. Enhancing real-time reporting, UI intuitiveness, and extending API capabilities could provide additional value.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Everbridge offers straightforward deployment ideal for organizations needing immediate functionality, backed by extensive customer support. xMatters provides a customizable setup allowing tailored workflows and is supported by dedicated customer assistance, catering to diverse organizational needs.

Pricing and ROI: Everbridge stands out with cost-effective pricing suitable for budget-conscious organizations, ensuring good value. xMatters, although requiring a higher initial investment, delivers significant ROI with superior features and process enhancements, justified for businesses seeking advanced capabilities and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,410 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Everbridge IT Alerting

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of Everbridge IT Alerting is 5.7%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 5.9%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Everbridge IT Alerting	5.7%
xMatters	5.9%
Other	88.4%

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1846215

Crisis Management Director at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Helps in identifying potential impact and allows us to see where our assets are in relation to a risk event

I personally love VCC because I just think there needs to be more data to support it so we can be more proactive and easily assess the impact. So, I appreciate the visual aspect, but it has to have the data to support it. It has proved very useful, particularly because we have a GSOC that's not technically 24/7. We do have an 800 number that people call 24/7. If something happens, they can easily send Everbridge a notification to activate the team off hours. It is useful in that respect too. We use it in conjunction with teams, but off-hours and for additional people outside of the core team, we use Everbridge, which is useful.

Read full review

reviewer1855452

Infrastructure Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Helps in ensuring that everyone gets notified when needed, and provides the flexibility to integrate it and build what we want on top of it

They recently released an incident module that allows users, or at least teams, to track major incidents and other things, and you can send out communication via that one webpage. You can engage on-call teams and communicate to stakeholders as well, but one thing that is missing there is a group chat. If there is a group chat on the same webpage that all of the support teams could use, it would be a one-stop shop that all of the major incident managers would use as their product to manage a major incident. Without that, at the moment, they are mainly referring to teams and then adding data into xMatters as and when they can. Some of the workflow development work that we do for the in-house piece can be quite complicated if you don't have experience using the tool. You have to have to go through the documentation, but I suppose that's an expectation. When users first log on and they're configuring the rotas, it does take them a bit of time to get their heads around how to configure the shifts. Some of them do need guidance. We have got a support document, and xMatters also has a support page where they can go and read through the details. Our roles and access for each user are locked down, as opposed to just letting them access the xMatters portal because it can add more confusion because the support portal explains that they can do X, Y, and Z. So, we're removing that ability, but once the users get their head around how to configure the rotas, the overall intuitiveness of the UI is pretty good. It is simple and clean, and they don't have to do that many steps. There are probably one or two group supervisors that configure the rotas, and the rest of them log on. We've already pre-populated the contact details from our directory, so usually, they'll just go and add a personal device, if they do want to get called on a personal device, or they want to set up the app, which is pretty easy using the QR codes. The product looks nice and clean. The only thing is that it takes a little bit of work to get your head around the rotas, but once you do, it's pretty darn simple.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I manage the platform, and I don't really use it. The scheduling aspect of it is valuable where you create your groups and then either manually or via API call, you can initiate an alert. It'll look at the schedule and only contact those people who are on-call. So, it takes the guesswork out."

"The most important feature, from our perspective, is the integration with our ticketing system. That eliminates wasted motion and time in drafting and sending and finding the right distribution list."

"The email integration, the ability to launch from other programs using email triggers, was the primary reason we got the solution and it's been really helpful"

"It's very customizable. For instance, if you're going on vacation this week, you go to your calendar and say, "I'm off this week, make the secondary the primary." And that's done on-the-fly. It's very responsive. It's very user-friendly."

"You can configure the tool to escalate if no action is taken within a certain time period. That avoids sending off an alert that nobody deals with and where nobody knows that nobody has dealt with it."

"You can program in rotations, shifts, and scenarios of different kinds and it allows you to page multiple people, or people in sequence, or a group of people simultaneously."

"I personally love VCC because I just think there needs to be more data to support it so we can be more proactive and easily assess the impact. So, I appreciate the visual aspect, but it has to have the data to support it. It has proved very useful, particularly because we have a GSOC that's not technically 24/7. We do have an 800 number that people call 24/7. If something happens, they can easily send Everbridge a notification to activate the team off hours. It is useful in that respect too. We use it in conjunction with teams, but off-hours and for additional people outside of the core team, we use Everbridge, which is useful."

"The most important features are the scheduling capability and the integration with ServiceNow."

More Everbridge IT Alerting pros

"It helped change behavior across the organization to improve accountability."

"It reduces the amount of oversight required, and consequently, the amount of time to assign and get a response on a ticket."

"We have not noticed any scalability issues in the two years that we have used the system."

"Having our users manage their own notification devices within xMatters is huge, since it takes the burden off our datacenter."

"Support has been great. They responded very quickly to all the support cases that I have submitted."

"It has been easy to use and very reliable."

"This has made it much easier to send notifications to a group or individual, as you just need to know the name and the message to send."

"The automated callouts, without a doubt, are most valuable. They have been a huge gain for our company. Previous to xMatters, there was no real management of the on-call resources or rotas. So, having that centralized and automated has been a huge gain."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"I would like to have a little bit more flexibility in the member portal."

"An incident management feature would be nice because, as it stands now, you select different items when you're filling out a form to launch a notification. If those were more conditional it would help. Right now it just puts out whatever you put into the form, whereas, if you could specify a "yes" or "no" and it would input a different verbiage, that would be nice to have, instead of having to spell out all the verbiage."

"What I would like to see is vendor alerting. It's not structured to take into account that users outside of our environment, users outside of IT, may not be in the group. IBM is an outside vendor for us, and we have IBM CEs who come in on a regular basis. If there's a problem, we call those vendors in. That should be tied into the system where we can say that vendors A, B, and C have these users and we want them available to come into the office when there's an issue. We want to be able to alert them in the same way we alert internally."

"The ability to not have to worry about the IT alerting and calendar resources. I would like it to be simpler in the sense of a different cost structure."

"With their templates, you can only have a maximum of three phases: new, updated, and resolved. It's not always that easy when we open up a call, that we identify who we need, page out, and we're good. A lot of time it requires multiple page-outs. Being restricted to those three phases, there's no way to say, "I want this variable to be persistent, and this one to not be." ...I would like to see a bit more flexibility and tighter control over the templates and the variables you can create."

"Explanations are limited to 500 characters in description fields."

"The solution's non-targeted communication with external parties could be enhanced."

"I swapped two people's weeks, and at least from what I saw, I had to do each day individually. It would be nice if I could swap two people's weeks without having to do it each day."

More Everbridge IT Alerting cons

"On-call management scheduling is difficult."

"Additional built-in integrations with other applications would be an area of improvement."

"If you are not one of the big players of their customers, the chance that one of your minor wishes will granted are very small."

"The user interface could be more intuitive. Once you know what you're doing, you're fine. However, if you don't know where to start then it can be a bit difficult to figure out how to make it work and how it will function together with different tools in the Flow Designer."

"We would like to see the ability to support custom devices. We have a lot of users who use Slack, which is another tool for communication. xMatters currently does not support Slack as a communication method. It can't send events to Slack and respond to them."

"What I would like it to do is tell me anytime there is a P1 incident, except when the ticket is assigned to this team or when this word is in the summary, but there is no exclusion option. I have been complaining about this for a couple years. At one point, we created a ticket for this with the developers to review. I assume that once enough people complain about it, they will bump it up in priority to work on. However, if not enough people think it is an issue, then they prioritize their work and work on other features and functionality. However, this is something that has been challenging for us because we have needed to find ways to work around it or just deal with it. So, I would love to see an exclusion option."

"When you are not using the conference bridge from xMatters and you are using an external one, it is a little bit hard to get the person whom xMatters calls to jump directly to the external bridge. They need to hang up the phone and then get to the email to get the URL so that they can jump on the bridge. There is no direct connection from xMatters to that external bridge, but I understand that part of the business."

"We would like to see a greater variety of integrations with ServiceNow. It works fine as it is, but an enhancement would be the ability to interact with the major incident module in ServiceNow... The way our major incident process works, when an incident is elevated from a P1 to a major incident, that is an extra flag in ServiceNow. It would be awesome to have xMatters get notification when something goes from a P1 to a major and then have it go through a different workflow, rather than our regular P1."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Everbridge IT Alerting is a cost-efficient solution."

"It's a seven out of ten for us in terms of pricing. We've just gone through a process of looking at other solutions."

"As far as I'm aware, there are no costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"They are one of the top three most expensive products. I also understand if you are going to use them for IT alerting, it is worth it. They are competitively priced, but the IT alerting is the differentiator. The way that they market it and push it out. That is their premier function."

"For the one-way license, which refers to someone is just on the receiving end, it's very affordable. I was actually surprised that it was a really good price. The two-way license, like an on-call resource who is actually going to be in a calendar and be paged, it is a bit more expensive, but for the gains that we've realized, it's certainly worth the price."

"The annual cost is $125,000 USD. That is for everything. It includes the 11,000 mass notifications. Technically, we have 500 licenses for IT Alerting."

"Licensing cost is driven largely by the number of users in the platform including admins, group managers, and message senders, so you want to consider your needs there."

"It saves us a lot of time."

More Everbridge IT Alerting pricing and cost advice

"xMatters is pricey, but you have to consider what a critical incident costs your organization."

"I don't make the decisions on the cost aspect. We haven't had any complaints. I think it has a reasonable price."

"We're currently per license. We're paying around $44,000 per year for 80 full users and 300 standard users. For a new implementation, we also need to pay for an expert."

"This is our biggest issue: licensing. Our customer has only purchased a set number of full licensed users, and we are constantly running up against our license limit. To mitigate licensing concerns, we completely control at the admin level user additions and removals, and do a monthly cleanup process driven by security contractor removal reports."

"I am not really privy to how much my client is paying for this service. They just tell me the number of licenses that they have. Every time that I say, "I need extra licenses to make sure that all Level 1 and 2s have their own xMatters account," they keep telling me that it is too expensive. If the only purpose is to call people, it doesn't justify the cost of paying more than the number of licenses that they already have."

"xMatters shortens the time to resolution, so the amount saved in potential lost revenue and productivity has justified the cost for our organization."

"This is a subscription-based, SaaS solution."

"The pricing is too high... we procured 150 licenses and we have almost 1,500 users in IT. We had to come up with a few ideas for determining which users get a license and which users don't need one. Due to the limitation of the number of licenses, we were unable to integrate the user profiles with Active Directory."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,410 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Performing Arts

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Everbridge IT Alerting?

Everbridge IT Alerting is a cost-efficient solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Everbridge IT Alerting?

The solution's non-targeted communication with external parties could be enhanced.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Everbridge IT Alerting?

We are using Everbridge IT Alerting for incident and crisis modules. The tool is powerful in itself, but as with any tool, you need to adapt it to the organization to be suitable for managing speci...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs Everbridge IT Alerting

Compared 22% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Everbridge IT Alerting

Compared 11% of the time

OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management vs Everbridge IT Alerting

Compared 11% of the time

HPE OneView vs Everbridge IT Alerting

Compared 10% of the time

ServiceNow vs Everbridge IT Alerting

Compared 10% of the time

More Everbridge IT Alerting Competitors

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters

Compared 37% of the time

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 21% of the time

Rootly vs xMatters

Compared 7% of the time

FireHydrant vs xMatters

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow vs xMatters

Compared 4% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Everbridge IT Alerting

February 2026

Download Everbridge IT Alerting product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

January 2026

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

No data available

xMatters IT Management

Overview

Everbridge IT Alerting is a closed-loop cyber security and incident response automation solution that helps organizations respond to IT Incidents faster and improve teams’ response performance by automating communication, collaboration, and orchestration processes for ServiceOps, IT Security Ops, DevOps, and Disaster Recovery Ops. As a FedRamp-certified solution, IT Alerting capabilities include in-depth scheduling/calendars, interactive & analytical reporting, on-call scheduling, automated escalation, response workflow automation, recording, and much more. The solution is offered as a cloud service based on the secure, highly available, resilient, and globally scalable Everbridge CEM platform.

Learn why 5,400+ enterprise customers trust Everbridge (NASDAQ (EVBG)) with their IT Response Automation Management and IT Alerting solutions; visit ITAlerting.com to learn more or request a demo.

Need Integration with your ITOM, ITSM, SIEM tools?

Plug Everbridge IT Alerting directly into your ITOM, ITSM, SIEM, IT Monitoring tools including ServiceNow or BMC Remedy with our certified, two-way integrations and automatically contact the on-call IT team members, launch conference bridges and automatically escalate to the senior personnel in case of major IT incidents.

Everbridge

xMatters, an Everbridge company, is a service reliability platform that helps DevOps, SREs, and operations teams rapidly deliver products at scale by automating workflows and ensuring infrastructure and applications are always working. The xMatters code-free workflow builder, adaptive approach to incident management, and real-time performance analytics all support a single goal: deliver customer happiness.

To learn more, request a demo.

Reliable services, rapid innovation: Automate operations workflows, ensure applications are always working, and deliver remarkable products at scale with the xMatters service reliability platform.

Automate on the xMatters service reliability platform: Move faster with confidence. Our no-code and low-code integrations let you build flexible workflows to address issues proactively—even during deployments.

Frictionless on-call: Manage on-call seamlessly. Automatically escalate to the right people, schedule with ease, and act on detailed alerts from anywhere.

Adaptive Incident Management: Stay resilient in any scenario with our adaptive approach to incident management. Automate resolution, protect customers from disruptions, and learn from each event.

Signal Intelligence: Put situations in context and cut through the noise of multiple monitoring tools with filtering and suppression, alert correlation, enriched notifications, and routing based on role or function.

Actionable Analytics: Get quick insights into key metrics to understand inefficiencies, boosting collaboration and productivity across engineering and operations teams.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

Choice Hotels, Alexion, Navy Federal Credit Union, EastWest Bank, IBM, Core Logic, Paypal, Charter Communications, Lowes, Express Scripts, Finastra, Worldpay

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters

February 2026

Free Report: Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters

Find out what your peers are saying about Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,410 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Everbridge IT Alerting vs. xMatters report.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.