Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText UFT Developer vs Zeenyx AscentialTest comparison

OpenText and Zeenyx are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8, while Zeenyx is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0. OpenText holds a 2.6% mindshare in FT, compared to Zeenyx’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zeenyx users who would recommend it.
OpenText UFT Developer
Read 37 OpenText UFT Developer reviews
  • 1,882 Views
  • 1,294 Comparison Views
76% willing to recommend
Zeenyx AscentialTest
Read 13 Zeenyx AscentialTest reviews
  • 381 Views
  • 125 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText UFT Developer and Zeenyx AscentialTest compete in the test automation solutions category. Zeenyx AscentialTest seems to have the upper hand due to its feature richness, potentially offering better value despite higher costs.

Features: OpenText UFT Developer provides robust platform support with extensive language options and integrates well with CI/CD pipelines. It offers advanced automation capabilities suitable for testing a wide variety of applications. Zeenyx AscentialTest excels in ease of script maintenance, modeling, and strong keyword-driven testing, with intuitive automation capabilities that adapt to different testing environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT Developer could benefit from simplifying its deployment process and lowering the learning curve for new users. Enhancements in user interface flexibility and cost efficiency would also be advantageous. Zeenyx AscentialTest could improve by offering more competitive pricing and expanding integrations with other popular dev tools and environments, as well as improving its customer support channels.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zeenyx AscentialTest offers a flexible and quick deployment model, praised for effective customer service. OpenText UFT Developer may have a steeper learning curve but is backed by solid technical support, requiring more investment in technical resources during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT Developer often incurs a higher initial setup cost but aims to provide a positive ROI through broad functionality and platform support. Zeenyx AscentialTest, despite a potentially higher price, offers substantial ROI from efficient deployment and reduced maintenance costs due to its ease of use and script management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT Developer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest Report (Updated: February 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT Developer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest
February 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Organizations achieve 70% ROI improvement by expanding OpenText UFT Developer users, reducing costs, and enhancing test automation efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.3
Zeenyx AscentialTest boosts productivity, reduces costs, and improves project outcomes through intuitive design, automated testing, and enhanced test coverage.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.7
OpenText UFT Developer users report mixed support experiences, citing responsive technical help but inconsistent communication and slow response times.
Sentiment score
9.2
Zeenyx AscentialTest customer service is praised for its prompt, knowledgeable support, efficiently resolving issues and ensuring smooth user experiences.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
OpenText UFT Developer excels in scalability and integration across platforms, despite some licensing cost and script development challenges.
Sentiment score
8.0
Zeenyx AscentialTest excels in handling large-scale testing efficiently, supporting numerous users and test cases without performance issues.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
OpenText UFT Developer's stability is mixed; recent updates help, but it remains less reliable than alternatives like Selenium.
Sentiment score
8.0
Zeenyx AscentialTest is praised for its stability, reliability, and bug resistance, making it ideal for diverse testing needs.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText UFT Developer needs performance, compatibility, and interface improvements while offering scriptless automation to increase adoption.
Users find Zeenyx AscentialTest's reporting, integration, stability, and documentation inadequate, with a steep learning curve for new users.
 

Setup Cost

OpenText UFT Developer is costly with flexible licensing models, primarily used by large enterprises due to its high expense.
<p>Zeenyx AscentialTest offers cost-effective, scalable pricing with annual and perpetual licenses, suitable for both small teams and large organizations.</p>
 

Valuable Features

OpenText UFT Developer excels with multi-language support, seamless integration, and AI recognition, enhancing test automation and productivity.
Zeenyx AscentialTest is praised for its ease of use, powerful automation, flexibility, detailed reporting, and reliable performance.
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT Developer
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
13th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (13th)
Zeenyx AscentialTest
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
16th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Developer is 2.6%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zeenyx AscentialTest is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Bosri - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient recording feature shines amid expected desktop and website enhancements
Our use case involves functionality for a system ERP. We work with Deviation, which is stable and receives positive feedback from users OpenText UFT Developer allows junior testers to learn through open source and online resources like YouTube. They can find solutions to issues even if the…
Read full review
Tobias Roth - PeerSpot reviewer
Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration
The concept of reusable steps in Zeenyx AscentialTest has significantly enhanced our test automation efficiency. Encapsulating common actions into modular steps reduces redundancy in test scripts and ensures consistency across scenarios. This approach streamlines maintenance efforts, allowing updates to be applied universally, making our test suite more agile and adaptable to evolving project requirements. The concept of reusable steps is a key factor in maximizing reusability and maintainability in our test automation strategy. AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows. This capability ensures precise interaction with various components of an application's interface, further enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of our automated tests.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Government
18%
Healthcare Company
15%
University
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?
There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?
It's a high-priced solution compared to Selenium. Selenium is free, though there is a paid version now too. Selenium has improved a lot, and it's still okay to use. It's a functional testing tool, ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?
The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites. It is also suggested that the design and some functionality could be better.
See all answers
What do you like most about Zeenyx AscentialTest?
AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Zeenyx AscentialTest?
While Zeenyx AscentialTest has proven to be a valuable asset in our testing processes, there are areas where improvements could enhance the overall user experience. One notable aspect is the user i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Zeenyx AscentialTest?
We use AscentialTest for automated testing of Powerbuilder applications via CI/CD pipeline with GitLab. We have fully integrated all tests in our CI/CD pipeline. Thanks to the integration, much wor...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer Logo
OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer
Compared 60% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer
Compared 20% of the time
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT Developer Logo
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT Developer
Compared 4% of the time
OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer Logo
OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer
Compared 3% of the time
Eggplant Test vs OpenText UFT Developer Logo
Eggplant Test vs OpenText UFT Developer
Compared 3% of the time
More OpenText UFT Developer Competitors
SmartBear TestComplete vs Zeenyx AscentialTest Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Zeenyx AscentialTest
Compared 100% of the time
More Zeenyx AscentialTest Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT Developer
March 2025
OpenText UFT Developer reportDownload OpenText UFT Developer product report
Buyer's Guide
Zeenyx AscentialTest
March 2025
Zeenyx AscentialTest reportDownload Zeenyx AscentialTest product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
AscentialTest
 

Overview

With OpenText UFT Developer, you get object identification tools, parallel testing, and record/replay capabilities.
OpenText
AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.
Zeenyx
 

Sample Customers

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
TJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT Developer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest
February 2025
Free Report: OpenText UFT Developer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT Developer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText UFT Developer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.