OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #25. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Read 17 OpenText UFT Digital Lab reviews

598 Views
339 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

955 Views
554 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle Application Testing Suite and OpenText UFT Digital Lab compete in software testing tools. Oracle Application Testing Suite is more favorable for ease of use, while OpenText UFT Digital Lab stands out with advanced testing capabilities and integration flexibility.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite excels in automated regression testing, supports enterprise applications, and performs comprehensive testing scenarios. OpenText UFT Digital Lab provides strong cross-device testing, scalable cloud testing solutions, and robust performance testing.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could enhance cloud-based features, improve integration with non-Oracle systems, and streamline its complex UI for beginners. OpenText UFT Digital Lab could improve user interface intuitiveness, reduce initial setup complexity, and enhance offline capabilities for remote testing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers a straightforward deployment process with extensive documentation and responsive customer support. OpenText UFT Digital Lab's cloud-based deployment simplifies scaling but may present setup complexities while aligning with modern DevOps practices.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite generally entails a lower initial setup cost and delivers value quickly through streamlined processes. OpenText UFT Digital Lab may require higher upfront investment due to its expansive feature set but potentially yields higher long-term value by optimizing workflows and reducing time-to-market.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (14th), Load Testing Tools (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Digital Lab is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.2%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Robinson Caiado

Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automates mobile solutions while boosting productivity and fostering innovation

It allows multiple devices to be used and gives flexibility in adding devices when a project is needed. Most of the time, I have several devices where it is predefined. We can use it, but sometimes, we must scale it in a particular situation. It's very flexible. It is very important because we can use a different approach to software testing, for example, to find a way to execute UFT software testing with only one execution. This reproduces all the platforms that we need.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"The solution is scalable."

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"I would like to see better dashboards."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

21%

Non Profit

Manufacturing Company

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

We use it in financial services companies to automate mobile solutions and applications.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Perfecto vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 24% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 18% of the time

BrowserStack vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 17% of the time

Appium vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 14% of the time

More OpenText UFT Digital Lab Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 37% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 23% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 8% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

March 2025

Download OpenText UFT Digital Lab product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

OATS

Overview

Our enterprise-level solution is a complete, centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.

OpenText

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2025

Free Report: OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.