OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs Testim comparison

Read 10 Testim reviews

1,629 Views
1,150 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText UFT Digital Lab and Testim are test automation solutions for quality assurance teams, each offering unique features for different project requirements. OpenText UFT Digital Lab is favored for enterprise-level scalability, while Testim stands out for its user-friendly, AI-driven automation capabilities.

Features: OpenText UFT Digital Lab includes comprehensive protocol support, advanced mobile testing features, and strong integration with tools like ALM and LeanFT. It provides both emulator and real-device testing, making it suitable for large enterprise environments. Testim offers AI-driven test creation and maintenance, a recording and playback feature without the need for extensive coding, and pre-defined tests. It simplifies automation with cloud-based infrastructure, suitable for agile teams focused on rapid delivery.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT Digital Lab could enhance its user interface to further simplify complex deployments, improve integration with open-source tools, and offer better support for decentralized device testing. Testim could benefit from increased customization options, deeper integration with traditional enterprise tools, and enhanced scalability to support larger enterprise environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT Digital Lab necessitates extensive onboarding for complex deployment models but offers comprehensive customer support suited for large enterprises. In contrast, Testim's cloud-based model allows rapid deployment with minimal configuration and is paired with responsive customer service, fitting well with smaller, agile teams.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT Digital Lab provides competitive pricing tailored for extensive testing environments, delivering a traditional ROI for large-scale operations. Testim, while requiring a higher initial investment, justifies its cost through reduced maintenance expenses and accelerated test cycles enabled by AI. It offers significant long-term value for projects that benefit from innovative automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Testim Report (Updated: March 2025).

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Testim

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Digital Lab is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Robinson Caiado

Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automates mobile solutions while boosting productivity and fostering innovation

It allows multiple devices to be used and gives flexibility in adding devices when a project is needed. Most of the time, I have several devices where it is predefined. We can use it, but sometimes, we must scale it in a particular situation. It's very flexible. It is very important because we can use a different approach to software testing, for example, to find a way to execute UFT software testing with only one execution. This reproduces all the platforms that we need.

Read full review

PiyushSingh

Director at Xceedance

A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment

There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better response to what requires improvement in the product. I only manage the team that uses Testim. I cannot be exactly described as an end user of the tool. There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it. There were some trial and error methods our company had to deal with while using the product's documentation, after which we were able to get through the setup phase. I want the documentation to have more information to help users with the setup process. I want the product to be more scalable in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"The product is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The product is easy to use."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

More Testim pros

Cons

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

21%

Non Profit

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support.

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

We use it in financial services companies to automate mobile solutions and applications.

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

Perfecto vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 18% of the time

BrowserStack vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 17% of the time

Appium vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 14% of the time

More OpenText UFT Digital Lab Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 51% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 11% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Download OpenText UFT Digital Lab product report

Download Testim product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

Our enterprise-level solution is a complete, centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.

OpenText

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Testim