Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Oracle and Worksoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #25, while Worksoft is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4. Oracle holds a 1.4% mindshare in FT, compared to Worksoft’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

1,377 Views
785 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 69 Worksoft Certify reviews

3,673 Views
3,232 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Worksoft Certify and Oracle Application Testing Suite compete in the test automation category. Worksoft Certify seems to have the upper hand with its extensive features and SAP support, while Oracle Testing Suite excels in load and performance testing, particularly in Oracle ERP contexts.

Features: Worksoft Certify provides automatic test execution without scripts, seamless end-to-end validation, and SAP support with parameter-driven actions and content merge. Oracle Application Testing Suite's strengths lie in load and performance testing using OpenScript, supported by Oracle Test Manager and Oracle Functional Test, proving beneficial in Oracle ERP contexts.

Room for Improvement: Worksoft Certify could improve in handling complex loops and upgrades, web automation, object identification, and integration capabilities. Oracle Application Testing Suite needs enhancement in its limited support for web and non-Oracle applications, installation process, reporting utilities, cross-browser support, and user-friendly dashboards.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify deploys across on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud, but feedback on customer service responsiveness is mixed. Oracle Application Testing Suite primarily supports on-premises and hybrid deployment, with generally more responsive technical support. Both products benefit from community and technical support forums.

Pricing and ROI: Worksoft Certify's higher pricing aligns with its rich features, offering substantial ROI through automation, ideal for large enterprises. Oracle Application Testing Suite is priced competitively, often offered at reduced rates for Oracle customers, promoting strong ROI despite Worksoft's higher upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,832 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (15th), Load Testing Tools (13th)

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 5.2%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Worksoft Certify	5.2%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	1.4%
Other	93.4%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Venkata Manikanta Somala

Test Engineer at Wipro Limited

Best tool for SAP Environment & Powerfull Automation tool with user friendly interface

From my experience, Worksoft Certify is a good tool for automating SAP, and it also works fine with web apps. But while creating or running scripts, we do face some automation abort issues, which break the flow and need rework. Also, sometimes it feels a bit slow, especially when running more scripts together. If the speed and stability can be improved, that would really help. We are using CTM for scheduling and managing runs it’s useful, but there’s still some scope to improve things like live monitoring and checking results more easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"The solution is scalable."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"The easy of use and ease of integration of Worksoft Certify are very good."

"It is very user-friendly with an appealing UI, unlike a lot of other automation tools that we have evaluated. The fact that it can be used to across SAP and non-SAP applications (including web-based apps) is a big advantage. Using Certify Process Capture functionality has helped in hassle free test design creation, without the need to spend any extra effort to capture test steps and screenshots. The integration elements across HPE ALM and Solution Manager also work well."

"The scripting methodology is easy to learn. It is easy to maintain because it is presented in a simple, narrative way. You don't need to know programming." "It has reduced our test maintenance time by more than 50 percent because we don't have to do manual test processes. We have saved over 150 man-hours monthly. It has increased our delivery times. We went from 200 man-hours down (three weeks work time frame) to approximately 40 man-hours (three days work time frame)."

"Worksoft Certify supports multiple interfaces and applications like SAP, Web, or Silverlight Java, and Mainframe. It is easily integrated."

"Worksoft developed a tool to support ERP testing. All prebuilt functions are good at steering the application when the test is executed."

"The Worksoft Capture feature is most valuable. For example, if you are creating a sales order in SAP, you do not need to go to each field and do everything. You do not need to write code for each and every line. You can just turn on the Worksoft Capture feature and manually perform your actions. It will capture all manual actions, and it will give you the steps. It will write the steps for you."

"It helps us to implement automation testing as part of most projects, so the need for manual testing can be reduced. This really accelerates the testing process as a whole. Before, where it could take ten days to test a project, now it takes only one or two days to do the complete testing."

"LiveTouch is the best feature of Worksoft Certify; live touching the objects is very beneficial, and we can use the dynamic windows and objects."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"I would like to see better dashboards."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"We have had run ins with some bugs on Business Process Procedure (BPP) and Execution Manager."

"Our interactions with technical support has not been the best always and there is room for improvement especially with respect to the time taken to respond to cases. However, with the right contacts and reasonable escalations we have always managed to get quick attention on our cases."

"For the couple of the issues that we were really scratching our heads over, we were in communication with the technical support several times, but they never got back to us."

"Worksoft Certify's support team should respond more promptly when we are stuck with certain issues and looking for a solution."

"As part of our weekly regression, we wanted to use Execution Manager. However, from 2017 until March 2021, Execution Manager was not working as expected in our enrollment. It could have been better. If Execution Manager had worked well, then we could have doubled our productivity. Unfortunately, it had problems."

"We can use it for the web application, but we are facing stability-related challenges. The properties are getting changed. For example, when I am performing any operation on the text box but the development team has done some changes, our Worksoft scripts are getting changed. This is the main challenge that we are facing while developing tests for the web application in Worksoft Certify, where any changes in the backend are indirectly impacting our scripts. For the web application, there is a scarcity of resources. Unlike an SAP application that doesn't require much experience, for the web application, you require experienced people."

"In the past, when we've tried to automate some of our web apps, it has not been as robust. If there were one thing that could be improved, it's interaction with web applications. The issue we were running into is that it was harder to identify the objects than it is with some of the other architectured applications."

"The updates for SAP Fiori have been great, where previously we saw a lot of issues. A year ago, it used to fail miserably."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Cost-wise, compared with other tools, it is a great product."

"We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more."

"Worksoft Certify is priced higher than most tools."

"Purchasing and licensing are okay. Go for the perpetual licenses. In that way, you own a license, then you can purchase maintenance and support on top of that, so you don't have to pay every year for it. Even if you don't want it a contract with Worksoft Certify in the future, you will have your own license of it. Then, if your usage is not that much, you can have one or two perpetual licenses. However, if you want to run your processes, you will need more licenses, e.g., using the run-only licenses. They are really cheap compared to the full licensing."

"We have seen that the initial Worksoft implementation has helped our customers reduce their testing cycle time by 50 percent. With further continuous improvement, we have seen cycle time reduced up to 75 percent. That is the level of productivity achieved using Worksoft Certify."

"Saving money and better quality, these are the benefits of Certify."

"We could use Certify to do robotic process automation, which is basically running a process on your correction system instead of your test system. Therefore, we may do that in the future."

"On our last big SAP implementation project, we inserted an automation resource into the beginning of the project. Between automating regression processes, data staging, and using our automation to help repair cutover and conversion issues. We saved the project about $1,700,000."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,832 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Performing Arts

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

17%

Retailer

10%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?

A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

Yeah, the setup and license cost is a bit high as per I known but if you’re working mostly on SAP, it’s worth it definitely. You just need to plan based on your project and how much you’ll use it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Perfecto vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 67% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 3% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

September 2025

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Also Known As

OATS

No data available

Overview

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.

Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.

What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?

Codeless Automation: Enables easy script creation without coding skills.
Capture Feature: Records actions for rapid test development.
SAP Integration: Ensures seamless operation within SAP environments.
Interface Support: Enhances versatility across multiple platforms.
End-to-End Testing: Facilitates comprehensive testing cycles.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces testing time.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Minimizes errors and enhances efficiency.
Supporting Transformations: Aids large-scale SAP and cloud transformations.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with stability and reliability.
Maintenance: Decoupled scripts ensure easy updates and management.

In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify

September 2025

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,832 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.