Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle GlassFish vs Oracle WebLogic Server vs Tomcat comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of Oracle GlassFish is 2.0%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle WebLogic Server is 25.1%, down from 26.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tomcat is 19.9%, down from 20.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Server
 

Featured Reviews

it_user517413 - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers EE Support. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.
The products offers EE support. It offers ease of use. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.
Saikat Nag - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability
Our organization configures Oracle WebLogic Server in such a way that a load balancer becomes available. The network requests are segregated to the Oracle WebLogic Server as the managing server and different nodes are configured. Using the product as a load balancer helps automate request transfer from one non-functional node to another functional node. Due to Oracle WebLogic Server, the endpoints remain unaffected whenever a node goes down. The clustering feature enhances our organization's performance and reliability. In our organization, the health of the Oracle WebLogic Server environment is maintained and managed using Oracle Enterprise Manager (OEM). I would definitely recommend others to use Oracle WebLogic Server. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Erick  Karanja - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers high availability, straightforward deployment and easy to use
Tomcat could be a little bit more innovative. Tomcat could come up with a framework that's more lightweight and purely targeted at Java applications. Some other solutions are doing better right now, maybe because they have come up with MicroProfile, which I think is moving forward. It may actually beat Tomcat because of the lightweight nature of the framework, the MicroProfile. They're coming up with new solutions. So, for the future of Tomcat and to maintain the market share they might be looking for, they need to come up with initiatives to ensure that several of us have a lightweight framework to deploy applications on.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The products offers EE support."
"What I like best about Oracle WebLogic Server is its integration with other software."
"The possibility of having several servers running, so we do not lose the service."
"I recommend the product because the installation is easy, it provides a secure environment, and it's easy to manage. The solution provides easy monitoring. Accessing all the logs is easy, and deploying application versions is smooth."
"It has good integration with security features, including OWASP."
"In the newer system, reconfigurability and the fact that it is easy to configure, make it very valuable."
"One of the good features of Oracle WebLogic Server was the ability to add some custom parameters to its deployment and performance."
"The technical support is responsive. They are always ready to help by various communication channels, such as Zoom calls. However, sometimes it will take a while because when we are dealing with a problem, they need to look at the logs and configuration. A lot of the issues are related to the configuration that they need to look at thoroughly before they can give us a solution and it can take a few days depending on the type of problem."
"The product is flexible and allows us to leverage deployments."
"The scalability overall is good."
"Tomcat is easy to handle, its installation process does not take much time, and its server speed is also very good compared to other servers."
"One of the most valuable features of Tomcat is its compatibility with the Apache web server and its ease of configuration. It is simple to set up and maintain and allows for easy management of database connections, transactions, and isolation. Overall, Tomcat is a user-friendly application server that makes it easy to manage various aspects of database interactions."
"It is a scalable platform."
"The ease of use of Tomcat is its most valuable feature. Once we grade particular software, we simply download it and we keep an eye on if Tomcat is working."
"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to host applications."
"It is easy to manage at a basic level."
"We chose to use Tomcat because it's perfect compared to other containers that we have tested."
 

Cons

"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."
"I've had issues with some of the tracking features tracking and have had to go back to several generations of code to fix problems where things were touched."
"They should improve the solution's garbage collection feature."
"If you want to use Oracle products to the fullest with enhanced customizations, you need to get trained. There is enough documentation and the flexibility to configure the application to your needs but you will need to spend more time gathering the knowledge."
"Licensing fees need improvement."
"The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files."
"Oracle WebLogic Server's configuration could be improved because we need to do multiple configurations when setting up anything."
"Configuration can be a significant challenge, demanding a deep understanding and expertise."
"The integration could be improved."
"The high availability is not as robust as the competition is such as WebLogic and Jboss."
"I have no recommendations for improvements."
"The solution cannot host .NET applications."
"Tomcat is a polished product that has been around for a long time. It should be simple and high-performing, with the ability to grow and maintain stability. The fewer features it has, the more stable it will be."
"Sometimes we face issues with the private and public networks and ensuring that once Tomcat is installed, that it is secure."
"The product needs to have more updates."
"Tomcat is used mainly for database connections. As of now, we configure that environment for any database configuration. But if any utility can integrate where we can pass the database connection as a string of details, then it should encrypt them and keep them inside. From that security perspective, Tomcat requires improvement. They should integrate this security feature."
"Security integration in Tomcat is complicated. We need to use another tool to solve the security issues."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution’s pricing is affordable."
"It is expensive."
"Fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server is expensive."
"The licensing of the product is expensive"
"Its high expense is a significant drawback"
"The solution's licensing is high-priced."
"I would not compare WebSphere and WebLogic because both servers are really good. The only difference is that Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."
"Tomcat is not costlier than other solutions."
"We are using the open-source version."
"There are no additional costs apart from the standard license."
"Tomcat's pricing is very cheap."
"The solution is open source so is free."
"We are currently using the open-source version."
"It's open-source. We don't pay for the license."
"The solution is free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
849,210 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Government
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
43%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Oracle WebLogic Server?
Sometimes, some issues don't get fixed by Oracle's technical support team, and you need to invest time to fix them by...
What is your primary use case for Oracle WebLogic Server?
When we implemented Oracle Libre Suite, there is middleware, which is normally Oracle WebLogic. Many customers in Pak...
What do you like most about Tomcat?
Tomcat's ease of use has positively impacted project timelines. Tomcat already has high availability – it doesn't go ...
What needs improvement with Tomcat?
Resource configuration like JNDI and queue configuration, similar to other servers, should be provided from the admin...
What is your primary use case for Tomcat?
I am using the solution at running level three. It is for running web applications.
 

Also Known As

GlassFish
WebLogic Application Server
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TravelMuse, Clarity Accounting
Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Center for Railway Information Systems, SPAR Austria Group, Reliance Commercial Finance, Industrial Bank of Korea, Al Jaber Group, Safe Water Kenya, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society
1. Adobe Systems 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. AT&T 5. Bank of America 6. Boeing 7. Cisco Systems 8. Citigroup 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. General Electric 13. Google 14. Hewlett-Packard 15. IBM 16. Intel 17. JPMorgan Chase 18. Microsoft 19. Netflix 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Salesforce 23. Samsung 24. Sony 25. Target 26. Twitter 27. Uber 28. Verizon 29. Visa 30. Volkswagen 31. Walmart 32. Yahoo
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Oracle, Red Hat and others in Application Server. Updated: March 2025.
849,210 professionals have used our research since 2012.