Palantir Gotham vs Tungsten RPA comparison

The compared Palantir and Tungsten Automation solutions aren't in the same category. Palantir is ranked #40 in DI , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 0.5% mindshare in the category. Tungsten Automation is ranked #11 in RPA , with an average rating of 7.7, and holds a 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Palantir users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

Palantir Gotham

Read 1 Palantir Gotham review

1,287 Views
900 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tungsten RPA

Read 25 Tungsten RPA reviews

2,369 Views
1,761 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Palantir Gotham

Tungsten RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Palantir Gotham and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Talend and others in Data Integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Palantir Gotham

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (40th)

Tungsten RPA

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

Palantir Gotham and Tungsten RPA aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Palantir Gotham is designed for Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, down 0.8% compared to last year.
Tungsten RPA, on the other hand, focuses on Robotic Process Automation (RPA), holds 2.2% mindshare, up 2.2% since last year.

Data Integration

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Wallace Hugh

VP of Data and Analytics at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Nov 24, 2022

A seamless all-in-one solution

We use this solution to help us ingest data, for data manipulation, and to enhance our workflows. We use this solution to generate daily reports on the COVID-19 crisis — that's our main use case. Palantir has improved greatly for the data processing and reporting generation. This solution is…

Read full review

Jamil Milhem

Project Manager-Senior RPA Specialist at DEWA

Feb 2, 2024

Automates browsing tasks without needing a server connection

My use case for the product is in the finance domain. You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it. The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is seamless. From one platform, we can do just about anything."

"The drag and drop functionality is quite good."

"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."

"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."

"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."

"It is stable and scalable."

"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."

"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."

"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."

More Tungsten RPA pros

Cons

"I think there should be less coding involved. Currently, using it involves a tremendous amount of coding."

"The product needs more AI capabilities."

"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."

"The solution needs to be scalable."

"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."

"We've faced a few challenges with Tungsten RPA. One issue I recall was with sending emails that needed multiple attachments. At the time, the feature only allowed attaching one file at a time. We discussed this with Tungsten RPA, and they planned to add multi-attachment capability to their backlog. I'm not sure if it's been upgraded since then. The solution's desktop automation is tricker."

"The technical support must be improved."

"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."

"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."

More Tungsten RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."

"Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."

"The cost depends on the number of licenses and the number of RPAs."

"I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."

"Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."

"There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."

"Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."

"I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."

More Tungsten RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Kofax RPA?

You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?

Previously, Tungsten RPA offered perpetual licenses, but now it has a subscription-based model for more flexibility, similar to the Microsoft developer platform.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?

We've faced a few challenges with Tungsten RPA. One issue I recall was with sending emails that needed multiple attachments. At the time, the feature only allowed attaching one file at a time. We d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Palantir Foundry vs Palantir Gotham

Compared 91% of the time

Stone Bond Enterprise Enabler vs Palantir Gotham

Compared 9% of the time

More Palantir Gotham Competitors

UiPath vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 39% of the time

Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Tungsten TotalAgility vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 6% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 5% of the time

More Tungsten RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

October 2024

Download Palantir Gotham product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten RPA

October 2024

Download Tungsten RPA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow

Learn More

Palantir

Tungsten Automation

Overview

The Palantir Gotham platform comprises a suite of capabilities for integrating many different data sources for secure, collaborative analysis. The platform serves as an enterprise knowledge base, containing the full record of an organization's collective analysis.

Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.

Sample Customers

Team Rubicon, CGI

Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Talend and others in Data Integration. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.