Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Planisware vs UMT360 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Planisware
Ranking in Project Portfolio Management
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UMT360
Ranking in Project Portfolio Management
20th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
IT Financial Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Planisware is 8.7%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UMT360 is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Portfolio Management
 

Featured Reviews

John Andrew Kossey - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 6, 2023
A comprehensive project and portfolio management with robust scalability and dedicated long-tenured support team
Its benefits extend to the centralization and control of projects, particularly in terms of maintaining consistency in defining tasks, projects, cost accounts, and other essential elements. This level of standardization is crucial for efficiency and clarity, especially in large organizations managing diverse projects with varying timelines and complexities. The software's strength lies in its adept handling of categorization, allowing users to tailor how projects are categorized based on their specific organizational needs. Moreover, it facilitates the creation of activity types and simplifies the development of project templates. These templates serve as master projects, enabling users to swiftly replicate and customize projects by leveraging pre-defined structures. The significance lies in the ability to replicate successful approaches consistently. When a company discovers an effective method, it can be seamlessly incorporated into Planisware. The result is a standardized language that remains consistent across various projects.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It comes with a high cost."
"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."
"There are training and certification costs."
"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planisware?
I don't have any specific details, however, it might be expensive.
What needs improvement with Planisware?
I haven't had the time to work with any other TPM tools, so I can't compare it to other tools just yet.
What is your primary use case for Planisware?
We actually use it for project planning and estimating the cost for the projects, in resource management, and as a timecard application. Users can log their time using the timesheet.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Apotex, Alstom Transport, HP, Stryker, Rexam, Jotun, Gelita, Kraton Performance Polymers, Abbvie, Rio Tinto Alcan, Maruho, Teva, SK Chemicals
AGCO, Coliban Water, Consolidated Edison, Marquette University, TransAlta, Washington State Department of Licensing
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, ServiceNow, Broadcom and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: July 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.