Microsoft Project Server vs Planisware comparison

Read 13 Planisware reviews

1,460 Views
751 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Microsoft Project Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Planisware and Microsoft Project Server compete in the project management software category. Microsoft Project Server seems to have the upper hand due to its integration capabilities and extensive feature set, while Planisware is favored for its pricing and support.

Features: Planisware offers advanced portfolio management, powerful financial tracking, and robust resource planning. Microsoft Project Server provides seamless integration with other Microsoft products, comprehensive resource management, and detailed project scheduling.

Room for Improvement: Planisware could enhance its user interface and reduce the complexity of its deployment process. Microsoft Project Server requires improvement in intuitive usability for non-Microsoft users and could benefit from cost reductions. Both products could improve offline documentation and provide more extensive training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Project Server offers cloud-based deployment with seamless integration within Microsoft environments, supported by dedicated channels. Planisware's deployment is highly customizable but may require more configuration time, with a focus on tailored user support.

Pricing and ROI: Planisware has competitive pricing and a scalable cost structure, enhancing ROI over time, particularly beneficial for large enterprises. Microsoft Project Server may incur higher initial costs but achieves strong ROI through productivity gains from its integration capabilities, despite a steeper upfront investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Project Server vs. Planisware Report (Updated: January 2025).

Microsoft Project Server vs. Planisware

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Project Server

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planisware

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Project Server is 6.9%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planisware is 9.8%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Sean Achim

Managing Director at Knights Innovation Support Centre

Unlock comprehensive reporting and management with robust data extraction

The major advantage for me in using Microsoft Project Server is the SQL Server component. Using Power BI and SQL Server, I can extract a lot more data. The combination of Microsoft Project with Project Server and SharePoint provides a perfect solution for me. This setup allows for comprehensive reporting and management across multiple projects and portfolios.

Read full review

John Andrew Kossey

Planisware configuration consultant at Comcast Business

Capably brings single source of truth to enterprise project portfolio management; provides consequential, flexible data display with effective visualization; integrated use of Agile, Kanban

Historically, some releases--even with extensive delays from initial announcement--had minor, yet troubling glitches. Planisware Enterprise has been addressing this shortcoming with more frequent releases that include helpful improvements. 7.0.0 release was January 2021; 7.0.1 March 2021; 7.0.2 July 2021; 7.0.3 December 2021; 7.0.4 March 2022. 7.1 became available in September 2023. Documentation has become much more thorough and clearly illustrated. Release notes for 7.0.4 has 133 pages. In my experience, small irritations I reported in E7 have been fixed in several days. SaaS provisions that Planisware provides in relation to security are superior to what smaller organizations can afford. Planisware SaaS no longer relies upon third-party providers. Faster data response time is a user benefit. Availability of Planisware software as a service (SaaS) contributes to operational stability; your team still needs to keep the configuration responsive to evolving business needs. Each customer has responsibility for continuing to grow "know why" as well as "know how." Investing in local capabilities on your customer side is vital--both for technical configuration and functional administrators. Over-dependence on the vendor can be needlessly expensive. Discussions with fellow Planisware customers conclude that commitment to achieving and sustaining product proficiency across versions is a key best practice. At-cost Planisware certification courses can provide training for a corporate customer's advanced users (those responsible for maintaining L1 level changes). One function I have requested for P6 and continuing through E7 is a comprehensive, detailed listing of attributes across modules--somewhat similar to attribute display in OPX2 versions (pre-P5). Some few attributes (e.g., Z-order) are difficult to document completely. Pull-down list of hundreds of attributes is insufficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would recommend Microsoft Project Server to other organizations and would rate the solution ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is stable to use, especially since I work with Microsoft for an extended period."

"I like the way you can build the schedule by the Don't Start Before or Don't Start After values. You can use it to build your schedule based on how you change your dates. This is how it actually builds the schedule."

"The solution offers excellent resource allocation tools and is flexible, particularly in portfolio management."

"The usability is excellent."

"The scheduling feature is the most useful."

"We use Microsoft Project Server for project management."

"It is well-established, reliable, and compatible."

More Microsoft Project Server pros

"Planisware has introduced Agile concepts, making it capable of Agile management similar to Jira and other Agile tools."

"Overall, our company has all disintegrated systems, and with Planisware, we are getting a very integrated view of my portfolio reporting, cost and load, and everything else."

"It has an inbuilt BI tool, which can be compared to Power BI or Tableau."

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

More Planisware pros

Cons

"In terms of tech support, it took a long time for them to resolve a ticket."

"Collaboration should be better integrated in the desktop version."

"I'd like it if we could divide out the project calendars. On one project server, we might follow five projects or more at one time, and we'd like to see all of the items at once so that it becomes a long loop, but one where we can identify different projects in tandem and then focus on which we need to at the time. While I only have visibility into one, I'd like to see several at a time."

"Exporting data from Microsoft Project, especially Gantt charts, is overly complex and not user-friendly."

"Collaboration within the tool is lacking when you compare it to online or cloud-based tools."

"The product's UI is not very user-friendly."

"There need to be more tutorials available to users."

"The solution must provide Agile and AI features."

More Microsoft Project Server cons

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

"Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations."

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

More Planisware cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."

"It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter."

"The technical assistance is expensive but the solution is an open source software."

"It's not subscription-based, we purchased the on-premises version."

"I rate the pricing a one out of ten because the price is way too high."

"A standard license is cheaper, but if you want more features, then there is a premium license or professional license."

"There is a subscription model for different types of users for different types of roles."

"The licensing was procured before my involvement."

More Microsoft Project Server pricing and cost advice

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"It comes with a high cost."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"There are training and certification costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

18%

Energy/Utilities Company

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Project Server?

The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?

The pricing model is currently a challenge since it seems aligned to push users cloud-based. Considering the infrastructure commitments to SharePoint and SQL, the implementation costs are low if al...

What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?

I am not convinced that the pricing model is the right one. Microsoft has become increasingly expensive, and there seems to be a push towards cloud solutions which can be challenging for some. Addi...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planisware?

I don't have any specific details, however, it might be expensive.

What needs improvement with Planisware?

I haven't had the time to work with any other TPM tools, so I can't compare it to other tools just yet.

What is your primary use case for Planisware?

We actually use it for project planning and estimating the cost for the projects, in resource management, and as a timecard application. Users can log their time using the timesheet.

Microsoft Project vs Microsoft Project Server

Comparisons

Compared 26% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 10% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 7% of the time

JIRA Portfolio vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Project Server Competitors

Jira vs Planisware

Compared 24% of the time

Smartsheet vs Planisware

Compared 11% of the time

Asana vs Planisware

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Project vs Planisware

Compared 9% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planisware

Compared 7% of the time

More Planisware Competitors

Product Reports

Download Microsoft Project Server product report

Microsoft Project Server

February 2025

Download Planisware product report

February 2025

Also Known As

MS Project Server

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Project Server facilitates project portfolio management and everyday collaboration, enhancing decision-making processes. Its integration with SharePoint offers a flexible solution for enterprise project management, catering to complex project needs seamlessly.

Microsoft Project Server empowers project teams and managers with enhanced communication and comprehensive project visibility. It supports dynamic resource allocation, financial tracking, and risk assessment. A cloud-ready platform, it simplifies deployment and scalability, suitable for diverse project environments and needs robust integration with leading productivity tools and services.

What are the key features of Microsoft Project Server?

Resource Management: Allocate and track resources efficiently to optimize productivity.
Portfolio Analysis: Assess and prioritize projects based on strategic alignment and constraints.
Time Reporting: Streamline time tracking and reporting for accurate project insights.
Integration with Office: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office applications for enhanced productivity.
Security and Compliance: Ensures data security with customizable permissions and compliance standards.

What benefits can users expect from Microsoft Project Server?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates communication and collaboration among project teams.
Improved Decision Making: Offers comprehensive data analytics for strategic planning.
Efficiency Gains: Streamlines project management workflows for increased productivity.
Cost Management: Enables effective budget tracking and financial control.

Industries such as construction, IT services, and pharmaceuticals leverage Microsoft Project Server for managing large-scale projects with precision. Its adaptability to different industry standards ensures specific project requirements are met while maintaining operational control and regulatory compliance.

Microsoft

Resource and cost scheduling, time tracking, risk and document management in a collaborative environment. Software solution that supports the end-to-end governance of company portfolios, from finance and resource planning, to the life cycle management of products.

Sample Customers

Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations

Apotex, Alstom Transport, HP, Stryker, Rexam, Jotun, Gelita, Kraton Performance Polymers, Abbvie, Rio Tinto Alcan, Maruho, Teva, SK Chemicals