Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

JIRA Portfolio vs Microsoft Project Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.3
Microsoft Project Server support is appreciated for competence but criticized for delays, repetitive inquiries, and varied service quality.
It's challenging to navigate, often making it necessary to search for solutions externally.
Communication with two people, one was knowledgeable while the other was learning.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.3
Microsoft Project Server needs improvements in interface, integration, performance, collaboration, customization, support, cost, and multilingual design.
Exporting data from Microsoft Project, especially Gantt charts, is overly complex and not user-friendly.
The lack of collaboration capabilities on the desktop version, unlike the cloud version, is a limitation.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Project Server is rated highly for scalability but older versions may face limitations, prompting some to seek cloud alternatives.
The desktop version does not have scalability.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
Microsoft Project Server pricing varies by hosting and licensing, offering competitive rates compared to alternatives, starting at $350 monthly.
Microsoft's products are expensive for individuals.
The pricing for Microsoft Project is fair, considering it is ahead of competitors and offers a comprehensive suite of features.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Project Server is stable, though performance issues arise with large projects, integrations, and older versions; newer versions improve stability.
I have never had to reach out to their support because the product works as expected.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
Microsoft Project Server is preferred for its integration, user-friendly interface, adaptability, scalability, and powerful project management features.
The Gantt chart is also a very powerful tool for a visual presentation of sequences, critical paths, and execution processes, which simplifies comprehension for users.
The level of customization is significant, and there are ample resources available online about how to use it.
 

Categories and Ranking

JIRA Portfolio
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (4th)
Microsoft Project Server
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
Project Portfolio Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

JIRA Portfolio and Microsoft Project Server aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. JIRA Portfolio is designed for Enterprise Agile Planning Tools and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, down 2.6% compared to last year.
Microsoft Project Server, on the other hand, focuses on Project Portfolio Management, holds 8.3% mindshare, down 8.9% since last year.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
Project Portfolio Management
 

Featured Reviews

Gary Craven - PeerSpot reviewer
Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve
The weakness of the solution is that the interface is a little nonstandard, meaning it's very flexible. It's got a lot of power and gives the user the ability to combine different projects into the portfolio and move user stories between projects and link them. What I have found in a couple of organizations that I've used it with, is that the uptake tends to be a little slow because it's got a bit of a learning curve. It can dump data out to Excel and those programs, but it also has a big ecosystem of plugins and add-ons that you can get. I guess it has some strength in that regard, but if you're going to run it on-prem, you have to have people that are pretty well-versed in the program and have the time and capabilities to handle integration and make sure they're adding those modules correctly. Their interface is a little unique and I think that's partly because the core of the product has morphed into several sub-products, but the underlying architecture has stayed the same on all of them in that it was originally a help desk ticketing system. Now they are moving into these new use cases, including systems development, business projects, business processes, and redevelopment projects, but there is a problem with the nomenclature that they use, and some of the documentation is a little techy for moving it into those more business-focused use cases. It's a very tech-focused product and that's fair given its origins, but if they really want to expand their community of users, then they're going to have to move beyond that a little bit and polish it up.
Hariharan Mahadevan - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective resource allocation and collaboration tools with good flexibility
My clients use Microsoft Project Server since it is very useful and helpful, making their jobs and lives easier. It is particularly effective for program managers and is currently being used in my project Microsoft Project Server makes everything easier by providing a helpful and useful tool that…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JIRA Portfolio?
The solution's tracking capabilities helped ensure we had full visibility into planned work and scheduled work.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Portfolio?
When we first got the tool, it cost 3,000 euros a year for unlimited users, which was a great deal. But the prices kept going up over the years. I'm not involved with pricing anymore, but I heard t...
What needs improvement with JIRA Portfolio?
The tool needs to improve its speed and response time.
What do you like most about Microsoft Project Server?
The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?
The price paid for Microsoft Project Server is a bit more than the value received. Ideally, only 10% of the cost of the entire exercise should be spent on project management tools. Due to the high ...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?
Microsoft Project Server needs improvement in the integration of more tools and syncing of Blockly tools on time. The portfolio management area also has room for improvement in terms of supporting ...
 

Also Known As

Portfolio for JIRA
MS Project Server
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rosetta Stone, Sprint, UBS, Workday, Expedia, J.P. Morgan
Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
Find out what your peers are saying about JIRA Portfolio vs. Microsoft Project Server and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.