We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's tracking capabilities helped ensure we had full visibility into planned work and scheduled work."
"Its stability is very reliable."
"The status update function is the most valuable feature."
"The valuable features of the JIRA Portfolio are the customization it provides which is very useful and the Agile project management capability."
"Jira's Structure, agile, and Kanban boards are helpful. I also like JQuery, which allows you to fetch the relevant set of data. We use JQuery, JQL, and the Structure board a lot. Kanban boards help us monitor daily tasks, and we review the progress using the burndown charts."
"Has many functionalities including good supervision and workflows."
"The tool helps us achieve more within the stipulated timeline and budget."
"The best features of JIRA are its flexibility and configurability, allowing us to tailor it to our specific needs."
"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."
"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."
"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."
"The solution's tech support is good."
"The reporting and dashboard capabilities have room for improvement."
"The data query language needs improvement."
"If you want to generate a report for individual usage, it's difficult."
"Their interface is a little unique and I think that's partly because the core of the product has morphed into several sub-products, but the underlying architecture has stayed the same on all of them in that it was originally a help desk ticketing system. It's a very tech-focused product and that's fair given its origins, but if they really want to expand their community of users, then they're going to have to move beyond that a little bit and polish it up."
"Requires some effort to insert functionalities and that could be simplified."
"There should be an integration of efforts between the cloud service providers' side and JIRA Portfolio."
"The automation in JIRA Portfolio could improve, it takes some time. We have to do some other tactics to have the same integration. Manually integrating something will take more work than if it was automated, but the automation scripting in the solution is not simple."
"The product presently lacks visualization capabilities"
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."
"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."
"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 55 reviews while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management writes "It helps us track progress and results". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Broadcom Clarity , whereas Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with EcoSys, Microsoft Project Server, Broadcom Clarity , LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal and Artemis Enterprise. See our JIRA Portfolio vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.