Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Planisware comparison

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Read 19 Planisware reviews

2,788 Views
1,506 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Planisware and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management compete in portfolio management software. Oracle Primavera is often considered to have an advantage in feature set robustness, while Planisware is recognized for better pricing and support, attracting cost-conscious organizations.

Features: Planisware provides advanced project portfolio management capabilities, including resource management, reporting, and integration with multiple tools. Oracle Primavera specializes in detailed project scheduling, risk management, and streamlined organizational planning, which are beneficial for large-scale projects.

Room for Improvement: Planisware could enhance its user interface and reduce the learning curve associated with its various modules. It also requires more comprehensive offline documentation. Oracle Primavera may improve its complex deployment process and should work on providing more intuitive modules for first-time users. Enhancing the usability of its Gantt chart functionality could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planisware features quick deployment and a customizable approach that supports seamless integration. Oracle Primavera offers a more elaborate deployment but compensates with extensive training resources and strong support structures, providing a balance between setup complexity and user support.

Pricing and ROI: Planisware presents a cost-effective licensing model, ensuring a good return on investment. Oracle Primavera comes with a higher initial cost but promises long-term financial gains due to its comprehensive features and capabilities. Organizations need to weigh immediate expenditure against potential future value.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planisware Report (Updated: December 2025).

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planisware

Download the complete report

Helped 879,899 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

10th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planisware

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is 4.0%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planisware is 7.7%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Planisware	7.7%
Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management	4.0%
Other	88.3%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2710611

Director at a consultancy with 5,001-10,000 employees

Ensures data consistency and improves stakeholder transparency while needing pricing adjustments

It is beneficial to have the schedule updated so you can have control of the cost. When you have a change in the schedule, you can also make a change in the cost. For us, it is mostly important to control dates and to be on time, but also to know the cash flow. With both of our clients, they use Power BI extensively. Though it may not be the best solution, they have all the tools connected to Power BI, which they primarily use for reporting. The integration with Unifier, which is also an Oracle tool, ensures that the data is correct and timely. The connection between Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and Unifier is not difficult to establish, and the information obtained is really reliable.

Read full review

StevenThompson

Solution Architect at Think People

Highly robust tool enhances project management for large-scale programs

The tool can be improved with integrations to Agile tools. We used Azure DevOps, which I dislike. Better integrations to JIRAs and perhaps open APIs for task management would be super beneficial. As a project management tool, it is perfect, but the ability to be agile with task management could improve it. There is always an opportunity for more flexibility regarding integrated reporting. The project dashboard feature worked perfectly for small to small-medium projects, but on a large scale, it was not flexible enough to handle a program-level dashboard. However, that is probably a nice-to-have rather than a need-to-have. The integrations to Agile are essential; we had to do a full build to accomplish that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features were the cost breakdown structure and work breakdown structure."

"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."

"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."

"Delay analysis and extension of time claims are some of the key features."

"It is very, very good in planning for large projects."

"The most valuable features were the cost breakdown structure and work breakdown structure."

"The integration with Unifier, which is also an Oracle tool, ensures that the data is correct and timely."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management pros

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"Planisware is primarily used for planning, scheduling, resourcing, and budgeting, and in addition to that, Planisware also has the flexibility to do work management execution and agile modules; it is an all-rounder."

"The positive impact I have seen from working with Planisware is due to its efficacy and speed; it has very few updates and is easy to use."

"Planisware's advanced reporting capabilities help the organization track project performance and align initiatives with organizational goals."

"I found Planisware really effective, and I appreciate it."

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

More Planisware pros

Cons

"There is scope for development in integrating with some AI products."

"The scalability has room for improvement."

"There is a need for improvement in the interfacing and possibly better integration with other programs."

"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

"There is scope for development in integrating with some AI products."

"For us in LATAM, the pricing is extremely high. That is why I only work with oil and gas and mining industries because they have substantial budgets."

"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."

"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management cons

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations."

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"The reports should be improved because all companies now need reporting, and with tools such as Grafana or Tableau, Planisware needs to add interfaces for data lakes since all companies require this."

More Planisware cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is an expensive solution. There is an upfront cost to purchase the solution and then there are annual fees to use the solution."

"The solution itself is cost-effective."

"My company has made an annual payment towards the costs of the solution. Price-wise, the solution is okay."

"The solution is highly priced compared to one of its competitors."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"It comes with a high cost."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"There are training and certification costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Government

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

20%

Energy/Utilities Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

Primavera appears to be more expensive than Microsoft Project but potentially less than Maximo. Pricing details from ten years ago are not committed to memory, and I would have to refer back to doc...

What needs improvement with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

Because we use mostly P6 and we do not use OPC, which is the new cloud version that is visually easier to use, I would rate it as an eight.

What is your primary use case for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

We try to use Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management combined with Unifier. Unifier is a cost control tool. It is mostly used in oil and gas, mining, and construction industries, but predominantly i...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planisware?

Planisware is very costly. I can comment that it's expensive, and even the consultants from Planisware charge a very high rate for their time. Generally speaking, they are expensive.

What needs improvement with Planisware?

What is your primary use case for Planisware?

My use cases involve building out a template library based on our methodology and continuing to iterate on that. We used a template, and basically, to start this out, we built out the template libr...

Jira vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Comparisons

Compared 10% of the time

Adobe Workfront vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 9% of the time

EcoSys vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 9% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

Artemis 7 (A7) vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Competitors

monday.com vs Planisware

Compared 11% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Planisware

Compared 9% of the time

Smartsheet vs Planisware

Compared 8% of the time

Jira vs Planisware

Compared 8% of the time

Asana vs Planisware

Compared 4% of the time

More Planisware Competitors

Product Reports

Project Portfolio Management

Download Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management product report

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report

Download Planisware product report

Also Known As

Primavera Portfolio Management, OPPM

No data available

Overview

Oracle's Primavera Portfolio Management is the leading portfolio management software solution, providing unmatched flexibility and infrastructure for enterprise portfolio management. With its unique functionality, real-world enterprise scalability, and unlimited configurability, Primavera Portfolio Management is ideal for managing just about any type of portfolio from ideation through execution.

Oracle

Resource and cost scheduling, time tracking, risk and document management in a collaborative environment. Software solution that supports the end-to-end governance of company portfolios, from finance and resource planning, to the life cycle management of products.

Sample Customers

Yarra Valley Water, John Wayne Airport, Hatch Mott Macdonald, Austrian Power Grid AG, EDF France, Chiyoda Corporation, Croatian Waters, Selex ES, Chicago Park District

Apotex, Alstom Transport, HP, Stryker, Rexam, Jotun, Gelita, Kraton Performance Polymers, Abbvie, Rio Tinto Alcan, Maruho, Teva, SK Chemicals

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planisware