

Planisware and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management compete in portfolio management software. Oracle Primavera is often considered to have an advantage in feature set robustness, while Planisware is recognized for better pricing and support, attracting cost-conscious organizations.
Features: Planisware provides advanced project portfolio management capabilities, including resource management, reporting, and integration with multiple tools. Oracle Primavera specializes in detailed project scheduling, risk management, and streamlined organizational planning, which are beneficial for large-scale projects.
Room for Improvement: Planisware could enhance its user interface and reduce the learning curve associated with its various modules. It also requires more comprehensive offline documentation. Oracle Primavera may improve its complex deployment process and should work on providing more intuitive modules for first-time users. Enhancing the usability of its Gantt chart functionality could also be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planisware features quick deployment and a customizable approach that supports seamless integration. Oracle Primavera offers a more elaborate deployment but compensates with extensive training resources and strong support structures, providing a balance between setup complexity and user support.
Pricing and ROI: Planisware presents a cost-effective licensing model, ensuring a good return on investment. Oracle Primavera comes with a higher initial cost but promises long-term financial gains due to its comprehensive features and capabilities. Organizations need to weigh immediate expenditure against potential future value.
Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management has had a measurable return on investment in that a project can be completed on schedule or sooner while using it.
I have indeed seen a return on investment with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, as it has helped us identify delays and focus more energy on the projects where those delays are coming from, enhancing our project management capabilities and allowing us to deliver our projects on time.
It is primarily used for the pharma vertical and related fields, and since we were running a full ERP digital transformation project in the life sciences domain, it suited that requirement very well.
Sometimes I feel that the ROI is not optimal because we are totally dependent on Planisware's system stability.
Whatever integrations we required at the time were well-handled.
They are very active, responsive, and solution-oriented.
We experienced a couple of issues, and they responded and resolved the issues and bugs promptly.
The support was good, but there's more space for collaboration that we can do internally through Planisware, which was not the case.
Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is very scalable, can work with any size of projects, making it a widely adaptable tool for any organization looking to manage their projects effectively and deliver them on time to their clients.
Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management's scalability for my organization is highly scalable, with no downtime noticed.
Primavera is very scalable.
The scalability of Planisware is good, as when you want to implement changes, you need to manage the process with your collaborators.
We experienced crashes in the upcoming year, but these mostly occurred on weekends, which minimized the impact on our users.
They have made significant improvements, but still, there is a long way to go in terms of their flexibility, adaptability, and usability.
Sometimes the ROI is affected because we are totally dependent on Planisware's system stability.
There is scope for development in integrating with some AI products.
There is a need for improvement in the interfacing and possibly better integration with other programs.
Reporting and BI tools would be a valuable additional feature to see in the future to make Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management better.
Better integrations to JIRAs and perhaps open APIs for task management would be super beneficial.
The reports should be improved because all companies now need reporting, and with tools such as Grafana or Tableau, Planisware needs to add interfaces for data lakes since all companies require this.
We have experienced crashes in Planisware and system slowdowns.
Primavera appears to be more expensive than Microsoft Project but potentially less than Maximo.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that the price is a bit costlier compared to other alternatives.
The cost is very cost-effective compared to other alternatives.
The embedded analytics and data visualizations in Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management specifically help us make data-driven decisions from the accurate insights gathered from different sources.
I find myself relying on the project oversight tools the most in my day-to-day work, which helps enable our stakeholders to make informed decisions based on real data while ensuring timely delivery and efficient resource allocation.
It is used to analyze the impact of changes in the project.
The tools communicate with other tools, making it effective, and when we have a new resource, we can add it and send it to the resource management team, who can view it in Planisware.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Planisware | 7.3% |
| Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management | 4.2% |
| Other | 88.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
Oracle's Primavera Portfolio Management is the leading portfolio management software solution, providing unmatched flexibility and infrastructure for enterprise portfolio management. With its unique functionality, real-world enterprise scalability, and unlimited configurability, Primavera Portfolio Management is ideal for managing just about any type of portfolio from ideation through execution.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.