Planview Daptiv vs SAP Portfolio and Project Management comparison

Planview and SAP are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Planview is ranked #17, while SAP is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Planview holds a 1.0% mindshare in PPM, compared to SAP’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

223 Views
113 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

SAP Portfolio and Project M...

Read 5 SAP Portfolio and Project Management reviews

694 Views
554 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

SAP Portfolio and Project M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

SAP Portfolio and Project Management and Planview Daptiv are competing in the project management software space. SAP Portfolio and Project Management is stronger in enterprise integration, while Planview Daptiv excels due to its flexibility and comprehensive features for adaptive project solutions.

Features: SAP Portfolio and Project Management features robust integration with SAP systems, which is ideal for large enterprises requiring seamless connectivity. It supports various business units like IT, finance, and R&D. The tool enhances productivity, cash flow management, and inventory control. Planview Daptiv is valued for its adaptability to various project methodologies, resource management, and robust reporting capabilities. It allows easy creation of new functionalities without needing code and is praised for its powerful collaboration features.

Room for Improvement: SAP Portfolio and Project Management could improve in reducing deployment complexity and enhancing user-friendliness. There is potential to offer more flexible pricing models. Planview Daptiv can enhance its capacity planning features and optimize executive support for training and implementation. Offering advanced analytics and ideation capabilities could be more pronounced.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Portfolio and Project Management offers a structured implementation approach but requires significant time and resources, which can complicate deployment. Planview Daptiv boasts a simpler, cloud-based deployment process and provides accessible customer service, offering an advantageous start for businesses looking for quick setups.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Portfolio and Project Management has a high setup cost but promises substantial ROI for large enterprises through integration with SAP systems. Planview Daptiv offers a competitive setup cost and efficient ROI via adaptive subscription models, suitable for businesses seeking flexible and cost-effective solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Portfolio and Project M...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Portfolio and Project Management is 6.6%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Antonio Lira

Territory Manager LATAM at LeaseWeb

Do not be afraid to migrate to cloud solutions

I started using Daptiv PPM at SAP R/3, 22 module implementation, with over 80 functional team members, in different geographic locations. It definitely gave us the opportunity to centralize all schedules per module and assemble work teams for each subproject, binding them with co-dependent tasks in other modules. This type of tool allowed us to finish the back office stage just a week behind the original baseline, a real record for SAP R/3 implementation.

Read full review

Nalin Kumar

Quality Assurance Group Lead at Samsung

End-to-end project management capabilities and offers seamless vendor and client contract alignment

The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of information simultaneously. This creates problems that I have personally experienced. Therefore, these aspects need to be much more free-flowing and seamless. If something gets stuck, it takes time to resolve, and during the contract phase, we have Service Level Agreements (SLAs). If those SLAs are breached, it becomes problematic. Given that there are approximately 3000 projects running concurrently worldwide, utilizing the system with a vast database and numerous activities taking place. It could benefit from decentralization. Currently, it operates as a central system, but if it could be centralized for specific subsidiaries, it would be easier for us to manage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"The integration portion with SAP models is valuable."

"SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs."

"It improves productivity, cash flow management, and inventory control for clients."

Cons

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions."

"The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of information simultaneously."

"It would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products like Jira and Bitbucket."

"The platform's support structure needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The product pricing varies based on whether the client is new or existing and the complexity of their business processes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

University

Manufacturing Company

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with SAP Portfolio and Project Management?

The platform's support structure needs improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Portfolio and Project Management?

We use it for end-to-end project management as per the received requirements. There is a customized module called the Project Management System (PMS) where we receive the requirements. Once a requi...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Portfolio and Project Management?

SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs.

See all answers

Comparisons

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 100% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Jira vs SAP Portfolio and Project Management

Compared 15% of the time

EcoSys vs SAP Portfolio and Project Management

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Project vs SAP Portfolio and Project Management

Compared 14% of the time

Planisware vs SAP Portfolio and Project Management

Compared 12% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs SAP Portfolio and Project Management

Compared 11% of the time

More SAP Portfolio and Project Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

March 2025

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

March 2025

SAP Portfolio and Project Management report

Download SAP Portfolio and Project Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Portfolio and Project Management

Overview

Daptiv by Changepoint is an industry-leading Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) solution that helps businesses connect strategy to execution. Plan and monitor your portfolios from a top-down perspective to ensure you’re investing in the right projects to align with the overarching goals of your business.

Planview

Portfolio Management integrates information from existing project management, human resources, and financial systems to provide an overview of the project portfolio with easy drilldown to details for portfolio managers, project managers, and resource managers. This enables innovative and collaborative, cross-functional business processes. Project Management covers the entire range of project management activities in development and consultancy projects, from planning to implementation to project completion.

SAP

Sample Customers

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Joy Global Inc., Citrix, EMC Corporation, Concho Resources, Concho Resources, RZD Russian Railways, Family Dollar Stores Inc., Lenovo

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management

April 2025

Free Report: Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.