Top 10 SAP Portfolio and Project Management Alternatives

Vendor: SAP

4.4 out of 5

5 reviews
100% willing to recommend

674 followers

Top SAP Portfolio and Project Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SAP Portfolio and Project Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Broadcom Clarity, and Smartsheet. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SAP Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SAP, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management

4.0 out of 5

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management

4.0 out of 5

SAP Portfolio and Project Management attracts enterprises with its integration capabilities and competitive pricing, ideal for complex systems. In comparison, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management offers agile adaptability and strong analytics, appealing to businesses seeking flexibility and high ROI potential despite initial costs.

Download SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Report

Pricing

SAP Portfolio and Project Management offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management involves a more intricate setup process, resulting in higher costs. The cost differences are significant, reflecting the complexity of each solutio...

View comparison

Pricing

Broadcom Clarity

4.0 out of 5

Broadcom Clarity

4.0 out of 5

SAP Portfolio and Project Management offers cost-effective integration with SAP ecosystems, making it ideal for existing users. In comparison, Broadcom Clarity provides advanced analytics and robust portfolio management, suitable for businesses with complex project needs despite higher initial costs.

Download Broadcom Clarity vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management Report

Pricing

SAP Portfolio and Project Management has an extensive setup process potentially leading to higher costs, while Broadcom Clarity offers a more streamlined setup with lower associated costs. This highlights a significant difference in initial financial investment between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Smartsheet

4.0 out of 5

Smartsheet

4.0 out of 5

SAP Portfolio and Project Management excels in feature richness with robust enterprise integration, ideal for large organizations. In comparison, Smartsheet offers an intuitive interface and flexibility, appealing to teams needing adaptability without extensive IT involvement.

Download SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs. Smartsheet Report

Pricing

SAP Portfolio and Project Management involves a significant setup cost compared to Smartsheet. Smartsheet offers a more affordable setup, catering to those looking for lower initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP Portfolio and Project Management involves a significant setup cost compared to Smartsheet. Smartsheet offers a more affordable setup, catering to those looking for lower initial investment.

Microsoft Project Server

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Project Server

4.0 out of 5

SAP Portfolio and Project Management is ideal for those prioritizing strong financial management and integration within SAP environments. In comparison, Microsoft Project Server appeals to those seeking ease of use, seamless Microsoft Office integration, and straightforward deployment, especially in existing Microsoft infrastructures.

Download Microsoft Project Server vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management Report

Pricing

SAP Portfolio and Project Management features a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Project Server. This difference highlights budget considerations for companies evaluating their project management solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Planisware

3.9 out of 5

Planisware

3.9 out of 5

Planisware excels in customization with industry-specific solutions enhancing resource management. In comparison, SAP Portfolio and Project Management's integration into SAP ecosystems offers scalability. Planisware suits businesses needing tailored solutions, while SAP is ideal for organizations requiring extensive integration and scalability.

Download Planisware vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management Report

Pricing

Planisware typically has a high setup cost, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making SAP a cost-effective choice at the onset compared to the more expensive Planisware setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Planview PPM Pro

3.9 out of 5

Planview PPM Pro

3.9 out of 5

SAP Portfolio and Project Management offers competitive pricing and seamless integration with SAP systems, catering to enterprises seeking robust resource management. In comparison, Planview PPM Pro provides advanced analytics and cloud-based deployment, appealing to organizations prioritizing flexibility and strategic project insights.

Download Planview PPM Pro vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management Report

Pricing

SAP Portfolio and Project Management incurs higher setup costs compared to the moderate setup cost of Planview PPM Pro, making Planview PPM Pro potentially more attractive for budget-conscious buyers.

View comparison

Pricing

Planview Portfolios

4.0 out of 5

Planview Portfolios

4.0 out of 5

Planview Portfolios appeals to cost-conscious buyers with customizable dashboards and strong customer support. In comparison, SAP Portfolio and Project Management offers extensive risk management, appealing to those valuing robust features despite higher costs and complex implementation requiring deeper technical expertise.

Download Planview Portfolios vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management Report

Pricing

Planview Portfolios offers a moderate setup cost, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Planview Portfolios offers a moderate setup cost, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expenses.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

3.7 out of 5

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

3.7 out of 5

SAP Portfolio and Project Management suits companies within the SAP ecosystem, enhancing integration and efficiency. In comparison, Oracle Primavera excels in complex scheduling and risk management, appealing to industries requiring detailed project planning and customization. SAP offers cost-effective solutions; Oracle provides extensive long-term benefits.

Download Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management Report

Pricing

SAP Portfolio and Project Management has a higher setup cost than Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, which offers a more affordable solution.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP Portfolio and Project Management has a higher setup cost than Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, which offers a more affordable solution.

EcoSys

1 out of 5

EcoSys

1 out of 5

EcoSys is the global software standard for the project controls industry. A web-based platform, EcoSys provides the deepest capabilities to support the complete spectrum of solutions within the Project Controls discipline – from project portfolio management and capital program management, through budgeting, forecasting, and performance reporting. EcoSys bridges the gap that has traditionally existed between planning and managing project execution.

View comparison

Related categories

Project Portfolio Management

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

Project Management Software