Portnox vs Ruckus Cloudpath comparison

Portnox Security and Ruckus are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Portnox Security is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8, while Ruckus is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.3. Portnox Security holds a 3.3% mindshare in NAC, compared to Ruckus’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Portnox Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ruckus users who would recommend it.

Portnox

Read 21 Portnox reviews

1,573 Views
876 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ruckus Cloudpath

Read 8 Ruckus Cloudpath reviews

1,140 Views
648 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Portnox

Ruckus Cloudpath

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Portnox and Ruckus Cloudpath are competing network security solutions in the IT infrastructure security category. Portnox has an advantage due to its user-friendly interface and quick setup, while Ruckus Cloudpath is preferred for its comprehensive features.

Features:Portnox offers cloud-based network access control, advanced threat detection, and smooth integration with varied IT environments. Ruckus Cloudpath provides extensive policy management, connection reliability enhancements, and robust security protocols.

Room for Improvement:Portnox could enhance its policy customization options, improve scalability for larger enterprises, and expand integration capabilities with third-party applications. Ruckus Cloudpath may focus on streamlining its setup process, enhancing its user interface for easier navigation, and providing more affordable pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Ruckus Cloudpath's deployment model is straightforward supported by dependable customer service, ideal for organizations seeking seamless system integration. Portnox is known for its simplicity and quicker deployment, facilitating faster operational readiness with supportive customer service.

Pricing and ROI:Portnox offers a more budget-friendly setup, delivering substantial ROI due to cost-effective licensing. Ruckus Cloudpath, despite higher initial costs, provides significant long-term value with extensive features and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,767 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Portnox

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

ZTNA (11th), Passwordless Authentication (2nd)

Ruckus Cloudpath

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Portnox is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Cloudpath is 1.9%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Scott Kerr

President at TrackerSoft

It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup

We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.

Read full review

Xander Janse Van Rensburg

Head Of Technical Services at Emtelle

Helps to onboard corporate users based on certificate-based authentication

The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process. Its most valuable feature is CA certification. You cannot get access without this. The tool's device policy enforcement feature has had a positive impact on customer network security. Customers are now more at ease, knowing that their employees connect to a secure network, and unauthorized individuals cannot easily access the corporate network. Overall, it has positively influenced their security measures. The user experience when connecting to networks via Ruckus Cloudpath is seamless. I would highly recommend it to anyone in need of an onboarding system for multiple users. Whether you want to move away from the standard connection, Active Directory, or even free keys, it is a reliable choice. Additionally, the product's licensing is user-based, not device-based. This means that regardless of the number of devices, the licensing is per-user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The simplicity of the product is commendable."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"It's a stable product."

"The technical support is top-notch."

"The cloud-based feature is very nice. We use Meraki for our switching, and it is simple to point all of our networks and offices to Portnox. It is pretty seamless."

"The Vidahost feature is currently in action, and it appears to be providing valuable data insights."

"The solution has a valuable reporting feature."

"The cloud-based feature of Portnox is excellent."

More Portnox pros

"The solution has good features for authentication, policies, and allowing users to self-provision devices for network access via their logins."

"The wireless devices are used to control access, transmit messages, and integrate with the main system."

"The ease of use is great, and the automation wizards can do a lot."

"Ruckus technical support is very good and helpful whenever we need them."

"The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process."

"Ruckus Cloudpath is effective for network security since it points out errors, especially when working with APIs."

"I find the solution to be very rich in features."

"The solution is easy to use, well designed, robust, and has good traffic capacity."

More Ruckus Cloudpath pros

Cons

"As there are no agents in Portnox Clear, the customers of the product cannot download any agents on their devices, making them unsure if the product offers proper security."

"From a resource perspective, the OEM can do better in terms of resource utilization."

"It would be good to integrate Portnox CORE with CLEAR."

"Allowing for a search of MAC addresses in the interface, whether they are authenticated on the network or not, would be beneficial. Currently, it only finds authenticated MAC addresses, which complicates troubleshooting when the same MAC address is used for different requests."

"The licensing is based on a per-port price, even when you are not using all of the ports, and this is something that could be improved."

"Their filtering system tends to lag quite a bit, so when I'm doing filtering at times, it doesn't filter the items properly."

"The support team is very limited. They don't have much support during Asia Pacific hours; the team sits in during the EMI and US hours."

"However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes."

More Portnox cons

"The solution could improve by adding more detailed information that customers have available on the dashboards."

"The setup process is a bit complex."

"The hardest part we've had to deal with is trying to find some physical product recently as everything is going like hotcakes."

"The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It would be great to see newer builds that are multi-vendor capable of full integration."

"There is room for improvement in deployment."

"There is room for improvement in deployment. I would like to see more effort put into troubleshooting."

"The setup had a few initial small problems, however, everything was resolved and it is very good now."

"The scalability could be better."

More Ruckus Cloudpath cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is quite reasonable."

"The users are not very happy with the new licensing option where there is only a subscription license. There is no perpetual license."

"Pricing is not cheap. It is based on licenses per port. After licensing is purchased, you only pay for support."

"The vendor price is fair."

"The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe."

"It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle."

"The cost of Portnox Clear is reasonable."

"Portnox CORE's pricing is adequate and cheaper compared to other complex solutions. Its licensing costs are yearly and include support. Cost is calculated per device."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

"The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good."

"I would rate the tool's pricing as a seven on a scale of one to ten. Compared to others, it's not overly expensive, but it does come with a cost. Since it's a licensed-based product, it can become expensive, especially if there is a need for additional licenses."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"The cost was somewhere around $700 for the access points, however, there was a discount."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?

It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?

It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?

We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ruckus Cloudpath?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Cloudpath?

Ruckus Cloudpath is a bit above medium in terms of pricing. On a scale of one to ten, I rate it a seven.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ruckus Cloudpath?

There is room for improvement in deployment. I would like to see more effort put into troubleshooting.

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 30% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 26% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 17% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 16% of the time

SecureW2 vs Portnox

Compared 6% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 61% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 23% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 16% of the time

More Ruckus Cloudpath Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

March 2025

Download Portnox product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

March 2025

Download Ruckus Cloudpath product report

Also Known As

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

No data available

Interactive Demo

Portnox Security

Demo not available

Ruckus

Overview

Portnox offers Network Access Control to manage user access based on policy, securing both wired and wireless networks while ensuring compliance. It supports endpoint security and prevents unauthorized access across industries such as banking, IT, and energy distribution.

Designed for both on-premises and cloud deployments through CORE and Clear versions, Portnox delivers a straightforward interface aiding in deployment. It integrates effectively with equipment from multiple vendors and security solutions, enhancing endpoint profiling and ensuring compliance. Portnox provides real-time alerts and network activity insights, bolstered by excellent technical support and scalability. It also automates monitoring, reducing the need for dedicated resources while offering a comprehensive view of network activities.

What are the essential features of Portnox?

Comprehensive Network Visibility: Delivers detailed insights into network activity.
Agentless Operation: Simplifies deployment without requiring additional software on endpoints.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse equipment and security systems.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications for unauthorized activities.
Scalability: Accommodates growing network needs without adding complexity.

What benefits should users focus on in Portnox reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without complex processes.
Security Capabilities: Strong defense against unauthorized access and breaches.
Automatic Monitoring: Continuously observes network traffic, requiring fewer resources.
Intuitive Insights: Clear visualization of network operations aids decision-making.
Reliable Support: Access to helpful technical assistance when needed.

Across industries like banking and IT, organizations rely on Portnox for endpoint profiling and compliance, ensuring remote worker security. Electricity distributors leverage its robust features for managing secure network access. Improvements like better third-party integration, enhanced graphical interface, and expanded support are desired, along with licensing adjustment and expanded use of AI and behavioral analytics.

Portnox Security

Cloudpath Enrollment System is a software/SaaS platform that delivers secure wired and wireless network access for BYOD, guest users and IT-owned devices. It streamlines getting devices on the network and secures every connection with powerful encryption. Cloudpath software gives you granular policy control over what network resources users can access. It lets you deliver a great end-user experience and virtually eliminates helpdesk tickets related to network access. Choose from cloud-based or virtualized on-premises deployment. Cloudpath software supports any user, any device, and any network infrastructure.

Ruckus

Sample Customers

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

March 2025

Free Report: Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

Find out what your peers are saying about Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.