Qlik Replicate vs SAP Replication Server comparison

Qlik and SAP are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5, while SAP is ranked #51. Qlik holds a 1.3% mindshare in DI, compared to SAP’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Qlik Replicate

Read 18 Qlik Replicate reviews

4,804 Views
3,651 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Replication Server

Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews

2,889 Views
1,647 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

SAP Replication Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAP Replication Server and Qlik Replicate are key competitors in the data replication market. While SAP Replication Server shines in established environments with strong pricing and service, Qlik Replicate offers superior features and perceived value.

Features: SAP Replication Server is known for its strong data integration capabilities, seamless SAP integration, and robust performance in high-load environments. Qlik Replicate excels with its real-time replication, cross-platform support, and versatile connector options catering to a wide range of industries.

Room for Improvement: SAP Replication Server could improve by enhancing user interface intuitiveness, expanding cross-database compatibility, and reducing complexity in non-SAP environments. Qlik Replicate may benefit from enhanced AI capabilities, further optimization for specific industry needs, and reducing resource utilization during large-scale deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Replication Server provides comprehensive deployment options with thorough documentation integrated into SAP ecosystems. Qlik Replicate offers easier deployment with an intuitive installation process and is praised for proactive customer support, providing a streamlined user experience.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Replication Server has higher initial setup costs due to its deep SAP integration, while Qlik Replicate offers a more cost-effective solution with flexible licensing and quicker ROI, making it an attractive option for businesses looking for rapid financial returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,258 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Replication Server

Ranking in Data Integration

51st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 1.3%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Replication Server is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qlik Replicate	1.3%
SAP Replication Server	0.9%
Other	97.8%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Shraddha Waghulde

Solution Architect at Predoole Analytics

Real-time data synchronization faces challenges with monitoring and affordability

The user-friendly interface in Qlik Replicate simplifies configuration and management of replication tasks because it is based on GUI, and users don't have to write any scripts. It is entirely drag and drop functionality. Even with zero knowledge of scripting, users can effectively use Qlik Replicate. The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature. As soon as data is entered into the source, it gets captured at target locations. This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location. Additionally, whatever operations are performed at the source, whether adding data, deleting data, or updating anything, it gets replicated at target locations. It functions as data injection from source to target, ensuring all operations performed on the source system are replicated on target systems.

Read full review

Imran Rafi

SAP HXM & Integration consultant at Kaar Technologies

Foolproof stability and robust system

SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience. One of its notable features is real-time replication, which ensures that data changes are replicated immediately. This is particularly advantageous when we need to execute full processes promptly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its capability to replicate the data without impacting the source databases performance-wise is the most useful aspect."

"Support has been great."

"Qlik Replicate has improved our organization because it has allowed each team the ability to do their own data replication into our single-source data, such as data lake or our AWS."

"It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change."

"We use Qlik Replicate to change data capture of databases in production environments."

"Great with replicating and updating records."

"The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature."

"The CDC and the flexibility to use QVD as a source are the most valuable features of Qlik Replicate."

More Qlik Replicate pros

"Currently, there is a Hadoop-based infrastructure with several engineers to maintain the data, and now, using SAP Replication Server, it has become automatic and requires fewer people to put data in the data warehouse."

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."

"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."

"The most valuable thing about this product is that it replicates data between SAP databases (ASE to IQ) very successfully."

"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."

"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."

"We use this solution for all kinds of communications like RFC, BAPI, IDoc, connecting with the orders, accounts, finance, data stuff, banking, everything."

"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."

More SAP Replication Server pros

Cons

"Support response times could be improved as there are sometimes delays in receiving replies to support cases."

"They can do a better job in the performance."

"In various scenarios, an important consideration is when we encounter issues and Qlik Replicate suggests reloading a specific table. If we face any problems or encounter errors with that table, it becomes necessary to make a change in Qlik Replicate. Performing a full reload every time is not feasible or practical. Instead, we should identify the specific issues and address them without repeating the entire reloading process. Based on this approach, we can investigate and resolve the problem by performing targeted loads from the source itself. This change aligns with my perspective and is something I would like to implement."

"The solution's flexibility to work with APIs should also be improved since it is very weak in working with APIs."

"Some features can also be overly dependent on each other. So, there is room for improvement."

"When you remote into it the Qlik Replicate UI a lot of times it just freezes. We set up the EC2, to allow them to go to the server and click on the Replicate icon, it just opens up and just sits there. At that point, we have to go into the EC2 and then reboot the server. This should be fixed, it is frustrating."

"There is complexity involved in the licensing part of this system."

"We would like to see more details in messages about errors with the system."

More Qlik Replicate cons

"It's a very expensive solution."

"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."

"There is a need to improve performance in high transactional processes."

"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."

"If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those."

"It's complex. It's necessary to understand a little about infrastructure, like network LAN and VLAN environment."

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."

"Setup was a little complex."

More SAP Replication Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"It's a very expensive solution."

"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,258 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

In terms of handling diverse data sources, Qlik Replicate does exhibit certain shortcomings.Other areas of Qlik Replicate that could be improved include its ability to serve as a single point tool,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My usual use cases for Qlik Replicate involve my previous organization and my current organization. I can provide my current experience. As an Australian energy provider, we have a lot of operation...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Qlik Replicate?

The usefulness of the self-service interface of Qlik Replicate lies in its ability for users to independently access fresh data from the data lake or downstream SQL systems or ODS systems without n...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 5% of the time

SharePlex vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

Fivetran vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Replication Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

May 2026

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

May 2026

Download SAP Replication Server product report

Also Known As

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

Sybase Replication Server

Overview

Qlik Replicate offers log-based change data capture, supporting real-time data updates without affecting source databases. It manages schema changes automatically and ensures seamless data distribution. The platform is user-friendly, enables late-stage transformation, and supports incremental replication and real-time analytics.

Qlik Replicate is known for efficiently capturing data changes with minimal impact on source databases. Its log-based change data capture capabilities ensure quick propagation of updates in real-time while automatically handling schema changes, facilitating ease in data management. The system's seamless integration across endpoints and a user-friendly interface make it an invaluable tool for incremental replication and real-time analytics. Despite some challenges like UI freezing, complex licensing, and error handling, it is instrumental in enhancing business growth and operational efficiency. Users continuously seek improvements in error insights, data compression, and expanded API integration to better serve diverse data sources and platforms.

What are the key features of Qlik Replicate?

Log-Based Change Data Capture: Captures data changes in real-time without heavy loads.
Automatic Schema Handling: Manages schema changes seamlessly.
Platform Integration: Integrates well with platforms like AWS and Snowflake.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers a simple and intuitive interface.
Real-Time Analytics: Enables immediate data insights for business growth.

What benefits should users expect from Qlik Replicate?

Improved Data Accessibility: Enhances access to data for decision-making.
Automation in Data Modeling: Automates repetitive tasks, saving time.
Efficient Change Data Capture: Reduces downtime and increases efficiency.
Streamlined Data Pipelines: Facilitates smoother data transfers.

Qlik Replicate is used across industries such as energy, banking, and semiconductors to modernize analytics environments and streamline data flows. It excels in data migration from systems like SAP HANA and Oracle to environments like AWS, significantly reducing downtime and boosting analytics capabilities. Organizations report advantages such as enhanced data accessibility and automated data modeling, which facilitates efficient change data capture and operational effectiveness.

Qlik

SAP Replication Server offers enhanced data replication for SAP databases with customizable workflows, real-time updates, improved efficiency, and seamless integration with external tools, catering to both private and hybrid cloud solutions.

SAP Replication Server facilitates effective cross-database replication, including Sybase to Oracle, while enhancing performance with reduced storage use. Despite its robust reliability and beginner-friendly setup, areas such as high transactional processing and cross-database integration to newer technologies require improvement. Integration with HANA and addressing high private instance costs are necessary. The platform supports heterogeneous database communication and is a valuable asset in finance, banking, and analytics across platforms like AWS, Azure, and IBM.

What features does SAP Replication Server offer?

Customizable Workflows: Tailor workflows to meet business domain modeling needs.
Real-Time Replication: Ensure database updates are replicated instantly.
Cross-Database Support: Facilitate data movement between Sybase, Oracle, and more.
Warm Standby: Allows seamless read/write access during failover.
Easy Setup: Access beginner-friendly setup with comprehensive online resources.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces storage needs and enhances performance.
Robust Reliability: Ensures dependable data replication processes.
Cross-Platform Integration: Works well with modern platforms for a diverse tech stack.
Business Continuity: Maintains operations with features like Warm Standby.

Organizations in data analytics, finance, and banking sectors utilize SAP Replication Server to streamline database replication and communication, optimizing processes across AWS, Azure, and IBM. Employee data replication for payroll and business management is simplified, supporting hybrid cloud deployments.

SAP

Sample Customers

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server

May 2026

Free Report: Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,258 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.