Qlik Replicate vs SAP Replication Server comparison

Qlik and SAP are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #45 with an average rating of 7.0. Qlik holds a 1.5% mindshare in DI, compared to SAP’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Qlik Replicate

Read 18 Qlik Replicate reviews

4,247 Views
3,143 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Replication Server

Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews

2,027 Views
1,155 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

SAP Replication Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAP Replication Server and Qlik Replicate are key competitors in the data replication market. While SAP Replication Server shines in established environments with strong pricing and service, Qlik Replicate offers superior features and perceived value.

Features: SAP Replication Server is known for its strong data integration capabilities, seamless SAP integration, and robust performance in high-load environments. Qlik Replicate excels with its real-time replication, cross-platform support, and versatile connector options catering to a wide range of industries.

Room for Improvement: SAP Replication Server could improve by enhancing user interface intuitiveness, expanding cross-database compatibility, and reducing complexity in non-SAP environments. Qlik Replicate may benefit from enhanced AI capabilities, further optimization for specific industry needs, and reducing resource utilization during large-scale deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Replication Server provides comprehensive deployment options with thorough documentation integrated into SAP ecosystems. Qlik Replicate offers easier deployment with an intuitive installation process and is praised for proactive customer support, providing a streamlined user experience.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Replication Server has higher initial setup costs due to its deep SAP integration, while Qlik Replicate offers a more cost-effective solution with flexible licensing and quicker ROI, making it an attractive option for businesses looking for rapid financial returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,468 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Replication Server

Ranking in Data Integration

45th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 1.5%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Replication Server is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qlik Replicate	1.5%
SAP Replication Server	0.8%
Other	97.7%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Shraddha Waghulde

Solution Architect at Predoole Analytics

Real-time data synchronization faces challenges with monitoring and affordability

The user-friendly interface in Qlik Replicate simplifies configuration and management of replication tasks because it is based on GUI, and users don't have to write any scripts. It is entirely drag and drop functionality. Even with zero knowledge of scripting, users can effectively use Qlik Replicate. The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature. As soon as data is entered into the source, it gets captured at target locations. This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location. Additionally, whatever operations are performed at the source, whether adding data, deleting data, or updating anything, it gets replicated at target locations. It functions as data injection from source to target, ensuring all operations performed on the source system are replicated on target systems.

Read full review

reviewer1834542

Finance Business Process Improvement, Transformation and Project Management at a consultancy with self employed

Eliminates replication and allows you to use only one database, speeding up performance and reducing amount of storage

The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades. As a company, you're either hiring or paying an outsourcer to do that, and you have to manage it, keep up with the updates to the hardware, software, and the operating system. It's very expensive because there's a lot to control and take care of.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Qlik Replicate's ability to correctly map and replicate data, especially when converting complex fields like packed decimal fields into integers, stands out."

"From a technical perspective, this is an excellent product."

"It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change."

"My advice to others looking into implementing Qlik Sense is that it's a great product."

"A valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is that you do not need ETL. It's easy to use—you choose two systems and it automatically replicates them. Even if there is no CDC available, if you insert it and update it, and there is nothing to find out, then you can use Qlik Replicate. It's a good product."

"The CDC and the flexibility to use QVD as a source are the most valuable features of Qlik Replicate."

"The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data applications."

"Qlik Replicate has improved our organization because it has allowed each team the ability to do their own data replication into our single-source data, such as data lake or our AWS."

More Qlik Replicate pros

"This product has a catalog with the location of all the objects which were replicated, and it's very simple to maintain."

"Currently, there is a Hadoop-based infrastructure with several engineers to maintain the data, and now, using SAP Replication Server, it has become automatic and requires fewer people to put data in the data warehouse."

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."

"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."

"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."

"We use this solution for all kinds of communications like RFC, BAPI, IDoc, connecting with the orders, accounts, finance, data stuff, banking, everything."

"The most valuable thing about this product is that it replicates data between SAP databases (ASE to IQ) very successfully."

"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."

More SAP Replication Server pros

Cons

"The solution's flexibility to work with APIs should also be improved since it is very weak in working with APIs."

"Some features can also be overly dependent on each other. So, there is room for improvement."

"They can do a better job in the performance."

"It's not possible to replicate the QVC files in data analytics."

"Support response times could be improved as there are sometimes delays in receiving replies to support cases."

"There is complexity involved in the licensing part of this system."

"Support for this product could be better. When we do, my rating is a two out of five, because their internal support is not great."

"It would be better if the solution’s pricing were more obvious."

More Qlik Replicate cons

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."

"If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those."

"Setup was a little complex."

"It's a very expensive solution."

"It's complex. It's necessary to understand a little about infrastructure, like network LAN and VLAN environment."

"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."

"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."

"There is a need to improve performance in high transactional processes."

More SAP Replication Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."

"It's a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?

The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

In terms of handling diverse data sources, Qlik Replicate does exhibit certain shortcomings.Other areas of Qlik Replicate that could be improved include its ability to serve as a single point tool,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My usual use cases for Qlik Replicate involve my previous organization and my current organization. I can provide my current experience. As an Australian energy provider, we have a lot of operation...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Replication Server?

It's a pretty good product and stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Replication Server?

SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to repl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Replication Server?

It's basically to transfer data from one server to another. It's used for this purpose.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 3% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 10% of the time

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

SSIS vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Replication Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

March 2026

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

April 2026

Download SAP Replication Server product report

Also Known As

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

Sybase Replication Server

Overview

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

Qlik

Information and data-driven insight is what powers business today. But to get the most from your enterprise data, you need a way to bring transactional, streaming, social media, and other data together – regardless of its format and whether it’s structured or unstructured – and be able to analyze it. The challenge is moving, replicating, and centralizing a wide variety of data efficiently, cost-effectively, and quickly enough to meet business demands for active insight. SAP® Replication Server® can help. SAP Replication Server enables the continuous movement of mission-critical application data.

SAP

Sample Customers

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server

April 2026

Free Report: Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Replicate vs. SAP Replication Server report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.