Qlik Replicate vs StreamSets comparison

Qlik Replicate and StreamSets compete in the data replication and data pipeline platform category. StreamSets seems to have the upper hand due to its no-code interface and extensive connectors, appealing to users without extensive coding knowledge.

Features: Qlik Replicate provides extensive data manipulation, transformation, and real-time change data capture capabilities, facilitating seamless data replication without the need for additional ETL tools. Its user-friendly configuration and detailed logging enhance operational efficiency. StreamSets offers a no-code interface with extensive connectors, including Hadoop and cloud services, supporting both batch and streaming data flows. It also features data drift resilience and a control hub that streamline data management tasks.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Replicate requires enhanced error reporting, more intuitive handling of dual-destination processes, and an improved user interface. Users face challenges with complex issue tracing and slower migrations. StreamSets has a basic GUI, complex logging, and limited SAP HANA support. Its documentation and error-trap handling need improvements for clearer guidance for newcomers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Replicate is suitable for diverse environments including on-premises and hybrid clouds, with customer support receiving mixed reviews due to response times and licensing queries affecting satisfaction. StreamSets is favored for public cloud deployments but faces criticism for high support costs, limiting access to customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate's pricing is high and core-based, making it primarily suitable for larger enterprises though providing significant ROI through reduced operational costs and efficient resource allocation. StreamSets offers open-source and other licensing models but is often seen as prohibitively expensive for small enterprises. Despite substantial ROI, licensing fees may include charges for updates.