Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
StreamSets Logo

Top 10 StreamSets Alternatives

Vendor: IBM
4.2 out of 5
528 followers
Post review

Top StreamSets Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to StreamSets based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Azure Data Factory, and Informatica PowerCenter. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
StreamSets Logo
StreamSets Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
4.0 out of 5
Informatica IDMC provides robust data management features with strong cloud integration, but users note high costs and challenges with SAP integration. In comparison, StreamSets offers ease of use and flexible data pipelines but faces issues with cloud integration and specific data source support.
Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. StreamSets Report
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) involves a high setup cost whereas StreamSets offers a more affordable initial setup. These differences highlight contrasting pricing strategies with Informatica leaning towards an enterprise focus and StreamSets presenting a cost-eff...
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) involves a high setup cost whereas StreamSets offers a more affordable initial setup. These differences highlight contrasting pricing strategies with Informatica leaning towards an enterprise focus and StreamSets presenting a cost-eff...
StreamSets Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
StreamSets provides a broad range of connectors and an intuitive canvas design for data operations and monitoring. In comparison, Azure Data Factory offers built-in connectors and a drag-and-drop interface, catering to flexible data integration across various environments with a pay-as-you-go pricing model.
Download Azure Data Factory vs. StreamSets Report
StreamSets generally has a higher setup cost, offering advanced data integration features, while Azure Data Factory presents a cost-effective solution suitable for straightforward integration tasks, highlighting a key difference in initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
StreamSets generally has a higher setup cost, offering advanced data integration features, while Azure Data Factory presents a cost-effective solution suitable for straightforward integration tasks, highlighting a key difference in initial investment requirements.
StreamSets Logo
StreamSets Logo
Informatica PowerCenter
4.0 out of 5
Informatica PowerCenter offers robust ETL and advanced transformations for complex environments. In comparison, StreamSets provides cost-effective real-time data streaming and agility. Informatica's comprehensive support appeals to traditional enterprises, while StreamSets attracts those prioritizing cloud deployment and modern pricing efficiency.
Download Informatica PowerCenter vs. StreamSets Report
Informatica PowerCenter typically involves higher initial setup costs, focusing on large-scale enterprise implementations, while StreamSets offers a more budget-friendly alternative with lower setup expenses, appealing to agile and cost-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica PowerCenter typically involves higher initial setup costs, focusing on large-scale enterprise implementations, while StreamSets offers a more budget-friendly alternative with lower setup expenses, appealing to agile and cost-conscious businesses.
StreamSets Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
SSIS offers comprehensive Microsoft integration for complex transformations. In comparison, StreamSets provides flexible cloud-native pipelines for real-time data handling. SSIS suits Microsoft-centric needs, while StreamSets excels in environments requiring rapid adaptation and high-frequency data updates, offering scalable ROI.
Download SSIS vs. StreamSets Report
SSIS offers a fixed setup cost, while StreamSets provides a flexible pricing model that may incur higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SSIS offers a fixed setup cost, while StreamSets provides a flexible pricing model that may incur higher initial expenses.
StreamSets Logo
StreamSets Logo
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Data Integrator offers robust ELT capabilities with integration flexibility across technologies. In comparison, StreamSets emphasizes ease-of-use with a no-code, visual interface. Oracle targets large enterprises, while StreamSets appeals to companies seeking rapid deployment and flexibility.
Download Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs. StreamSets Report
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) requires a significant setup cost, emphasizing its comprehensive capabilities, while StreamSets offers a more cost-effective setup, allowing quicker deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) requires a significant setup cost, emphasizing its comprehensive capabilities, while StreamSets offers a more cost-effective setup, allowing quicker deployment.
StreamSets Logo
Talend Open Studio
4.0 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
Talend Open Studio
4.0 out of 5
Talend Open Studio is chosen for its strong data integration capabilities and extensive connector catalog. In comparison, StreamSets is favored for its ease of use and flexibility in handling batch and streaming data, making it suitable for users less experienced with ETL tools.
Download StreamSets vs. Talend Open Studio Report
Talend Open Studio is free, offering a cost-effective setup, while StreamSets requires a subscription, highlighting a distinct difference in upfront costs. This key contrast significantly impacts budget considerations for users evaluating these two data integration solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Talend Open Studio is free, offering a cost-effective setup, while StreamSets requires a subscription, highlighting a distinct difference in upfront costs. This key contrast significantly impacts budget considerations for users evaluating these two data integration solutions.
StreamSets Logo
Oracle GoldenGate
4.1 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
Oracle GoldenGate
4.1 out of 5
Oracle GoldenGate excels in real-time data replication, aligning with Oracle environments, while StreamSets provides flexible ETL capabilities and adaptable data integration. In comparison, GoldenGate's high costs are offset by ROI, whereas StreamSets offers versatile deployment with both open-source and paid options.
Download Oracle GoldenGate vs. StreamSets Report
Oracle GoldenGate has been noted for its high setup cost, while StreamSets offers a more economical setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle GoldenGate has been noted for its high setup cost, while StreamSets offers a more economical setup option.
StreamSets Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
SAP Data Services offers comprehensive features for data integration and migration, facilitating robust ETL processes and strong SAP systems integration. In comparison, StreamSets provides a no-code environment for designing data pipelines, with versatility in supporting both batch and streaming data processes.
Download SAP Data Services vs. StreamSets Report
SAP Data Services typically involves higher setup costs, which might deter small businesses, while StreamSets offers a relatively lower setup cost, making it more attractive for those with tighter budgets. These differences highlight distinct pricing strategies for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Data Services typically involves higher setup costs, which might deter small businesses, while StreamSets offers a relatively lower setup cost, making it more attractive for those with tighter budgets. These differences highlight distinct pricing strategies for potential users.
StreamSets Logo
Qlik Replicate
4.1 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
Qlik Replicate
4.1 out of 5
Qlik Replicate excels in real-time data capture and transformation without affecting database performance, making it ideal for enterprises needing robust data handling. In comparison, StreamSets offers an accessible, code-free pipeline creation with a focus on user-friendly interfaces and flexible deployment.
Download Qlik Replicate vs. StreamSets Report
Qlik Replicate offers a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with StreamSets which presents a more flexible but potentially higher initial investment. The difference in setup cost highlights the variance in upfront financial commitment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Qlik Replicate offers a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with StreamSets which presents a more flexible but potentially higher initial investment. The difference in setup cost highlights the variance in upfront financial commitment between the two solutions.
StreamSets Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
StreamSets simplifies integration with advanced features, ideal for handling diverse data sources and ensuring resilience. In comparison, Alteryx Designer excels in data preparation with its intuitive drag-and-drop interface. StreamSets offers flexible deployment, while Alteryx faces higher costs and collaboration challenges.
Download Alteryx Designer vs. StreamSets Report
StreamSets has a lower setup cost compared to Alteryx Designer, which incurs a higher initial investment. While StreamSets offers a more budget-friendly option, Alteryx Designer provides advanced analytical capabilities justifying its higher price point.
View comparison
Pricing
StreamSets has a lower setup cost compared to Alteryx Designer, which incurs a higher initial investment. While StreamSets offers a more budget-friendly option, Alteryx Designer provides advanced analytical capabilities justifying its higher price point.
StreamSets Logo
Denodo
4.0 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
Denodo
4.0 out of 5
Denodo offers robust data virtualization for seamless integration across various sources. In comparison, StreamSets simplifies pipeline creation with minimal coding. Denodo excels in complex environments like pharmaceuticals, while StreamSets provides flexibility and integration with platforms like Azure and AWS.
Download Denodo vs. StreamSets Report
Denodo's setup costs are reported to be lower, while StreamSets is noted for higher initial setup expenses, highlighting a clear disparity in upfront investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Denodo's setup costs are reported to be lower, while StreamSets is noted for higher initial setup expenses, highlighting a clear disparity in upfront investment between the two solutions.
StreamSets Logo
Fivetran
4.0 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
Fivetran
4.0 out of 5
StreamSets offers flexible data pipelines with security across various platforms, benefiting no-code users with real-time analytics. In comparison, Fivetran provides user-friendly managed pipelines with minimal maintenance, appealing to those who value ease of use and automated transformation integration through tools like dbt.
Download Fivetran vs. StreamSets Report
StreamSets requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Fivetran, which offers a more budget-friendly approach for integration services.
View comparison
Pricing
StreamSets requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Fivetran, which offers a more budget-friendly approach for integration services.
StreamSets Logo
SnapLogic
3.9 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
SnapLogic
3.9 out of 5
SnapLogic is praised for ease of use and cost-effectiveness, offering quick ROI. In comparison, StreamSets provides robust data processing and flexibility for complex environments, appealing to those prioritizing advanced capabilities. SnapLogic suits straightforward needs, while StreamSets attracts those with intricate data transformation requirements.
Download SnapLogic vs. StreamSets Report
SnapLogic offers a competitive setup cost with flexibility, while StreamSets features a straightforward initial pricing model, emphasizing simplicity and transparency in their cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
SnapLogic offers a competitive setup cost with flexibility, while StreamSets features a straightforward initial pricing model, emphasizing simplicity and transparency in their cost structure.
StreamSets Logo
StreamSets Logo
Spring Cloud Data Flow
3.9 out of 5
StreamSets provides extensive connectors and ease of use with minimal coding. In comparison, Spring Cloud Data Flow excels in integration with microservices and batch processing but requires more programming expertise. StreamSets supports varied environments, while Spring Cloud Data Flow focuses on private setups.
Download Spring Cloud Data Flow vs. StreamSets Report
StreamSets offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while Spring Cloud Data Flow provides flexibility with potential additional expenses. StreamSets is easier to implement, whereas Spring Cloud Data Flow may require more resources during setup.
View comparison
Pricing
StreamSets offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while Spring Cloud Data Flow provides flexibility with potential additional expenses. StreamSets is easier to implement, whereas Spring Cloud Data Flow may require more resources during setup.
StreamSets Logo
StreamSets Logo
Talend Data Management Platform
4.1 out of 5
Talend excels in operational and analytical data integration with real-time access and advanced monitoring, ideal for users valuing extensive connectors and open-source ETL transformations. In comparison, StreamSets provides ease of use for non-technical users with a visual interface and robust data resilience features.
Download StreamSets vs. Talend Data Management Platform Report
Talend Data Management Platform reviews highlight a more straightforward setup process, while StreamSets reviews emphasize a more complex initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Talend Data Management Platform reviews highlight a more straightforward setup process, while StreamSets reviews emphasize a more complex initial configuration.
StreamSets Logo
StreamSets Logo
Ab Initio Co>Operating System
4.8 out of 5
Ab Initio Co>Operating System stands out with its high-speed data processing, ideal for reliability in established environments. In comparison, StreamSets offers modern architecture and flexibility, appealing to buyers seeking agile frameworks and faster deployment with cloud compatibility.
Download Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs. StreamSets Report
Ab Initio Co>Operating System has a higher setup cost compared to StreamSets, which is known for its more accessible pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Ab Initio Co>Operating System has a higher setup cost compared to StreamSets, which is known for its more accessible pricing.
StreamSets Logo
StreamSets Logo
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
4.0 out of 5
Pentaho offers extensive ETL capabilities with a user-friendly graphical interface, appealing to enterprises dealing with diverse data formats. In comparison, StreamSets excels in data pipeline automation with strong data connectivity, ideal for businesses seeking efficient integration and flexible deployment solutions across various environments.
Download Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs. StreamSets Report
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics typically requires a higher initial setup cost, while StreamSets offers a more affordable setup option with similar capabilities, highlighting a significant cost difference that may influence user choice based on budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics typically requires a higher initial setup cost, while StreamSets offers a more affordable setup option with similar capabilities, highlighting a significant cost difference that may influence user choice based on budget considerations.
StreamSets Logo
Equalum
4.6 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
Equalum
4.6 out of 5
StreamSets is favored for its comprehensive connectors, graphical pipeline design, and strong data transformation, offering batch and streaming support with seamless cloud integration. In comparison, Equalum excels with fast CDC, zero-coding tools, and efficient streaming ETL with minimal configuration.
Download Equalum vs. StreamSets Report
StreamSets involves higher setup costs compared to Equalum, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. StreamSets may cater to larger enterprises due to its pricing structure, while Equalum provides a more cost-effective solution for smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
StreamSets involves higher setup costs compared to Equalum, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. StreamSets may cater to larger enterprises due to its pricing structure, while Equalum provides a more cost-effective solution for smaller businesses.
StreamSets Logo
Rivery
4.3 out of 5
StreamSets Logo
Rivery
4.3 out of 5
StreamSets focuses on robust data pipeline management, ideal for complex integration tasks requiring customization. In comparison, Rivery excels with its no-code interface, simplifying deployment for non-developers. StreamSets suits those seeking comprehensive solutions, while Rivery attracts users prioritizing simplicity and quick deployment.
Download Rivery vs. StreamSets Report
StreamSets features a higher setup cost, while Rivery offers a more affordable option, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
StreamSets features a higher setup cost, while Rivery offers a more affordable option, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two platforms.

Related categories

Data Integration
Data Quality
Business Process Management (BPM)