Rivery vs StreamSets comparison

Rivery and IBM are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Rivery is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0. Rivery holds a 0.6% mindshare in DI, compared to IBM’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Rivery users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Rivery

Read 2 Rivery reviews

1,027 Views
698 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

StreamSets

Read 21 StreamSets reviews

2,665 Views
1,919 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Rivery

StreamSets

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

StreamSets and Rivery are leading solutions in the data integration category, each with distinct strengths. StreamSets tends to excel with its real-time data processing and automation capabilities, while Rivery's cloud-native approach provides a scalable solution for seamless integration.

Features: StreamSets supports real-time data processing, offering robust pipeline management and extensive connectors for various data sources. It specializes in automation capabilities, allowing users to effectively manage complex data workflows. Rivery, designed with a cloud-native architecture, focuses on efficient data extraction and transformation, providing scalability and adaptability in modular data workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: StreamSets offers flexible deployment models, including on-premises and cloud-based options, ensuring a tailored implementation strategy. Its comprehensive support resources are well-regarded. Rivery emphasizes cloud deployment, allowing smooth integration with current cloud services. It is recognized for responsive customer service within cloud environments.

Pricing and ROI: StreamSets features unique pricing, usually necessitating a considerable initial investment, with potential long-term ROI through increased pipeline efficiency. In contrast, Rivery follows a subscription-based model that aligns with cloud service frameworks, offering lower starting costs and predictable expenses. StreamSets promises value via pipeline flexibility, while Rivery provides a cost-effective, scalable solution with transparent ongoing costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Rivery vs. StreamSets Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Rivery vs. StreamSets

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 879,927 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Rivery

Ranking in Data Integration

35th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Migration Tools (3rd), Cloud Migration (15th), Cloud Data Integration (19th)

StreamSets

Ranking in Data Integration

22nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Rivery is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StreamSets is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
StreamSets	1.2%
Rivery	0.6%
Other	98.2%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2335923

Senior Operations Analyst at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides users with an initial setup phase, which is fairly simple to manage

I don't know what could be improved in terms of what my company was used to previously or after moving over to Rivery. I have not had much experience with platforms other than Rivery. For me, Rivalry was a way to step up from what we used. To be honest, I am not really sure what improvements could be made in Rivery. Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better. I am not aware if there are additional packages for smaller organizations, but if there are no packages available, then maybe that would be a good way to introduce something new in the tool.

Read full review

SrinivasanSankar

Enterprise Solutions Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Enables effective batch loading with visual interface and enterprise support

One issue I observed with StreamSets is that the memory runs out quickly when processing large volumes of data. Because of this memory issue, we have to upgrade our EC2 boxes in the Amazon AWS infrastructure. I had to switch to a new EC2 box, even though the processor was not fully utilized. It would be beneficial if StreamSets addressed any potential memory leak issues to prevent unnecessary upgrades. Additionally, it would be a great enhancement if StreamSets could produce a lineage graph to visualize how the data has passed through the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable features are that it is quick to connect and simple to use."

"Connects to many APIs in the market and new ones are being added all the time."

"The most valuable features are the option of integration with a variety of protocols, languages, and origins."

"I really appreciate the numerous ready connectors available on both the source and target sides, the support for various media file formats, and the ease of configuring and managing pipelines centrally."

"The ETL capabilities are very useful for us. We extract and transform data from multiple data sources, into a single, consistent data store, and then we put it in our systems. We typically use it to connect our Apache Kafka with data lakes. That process is smooth and saves us a lot of time in our production systems."

"Also, the intuitive canvas for designing all the streams in the pipeline, along with the simplicity of the entire product are very big pluses for me. The software is very simple and straightforward. That is something that is needed right now."

"The best thing about StreamSets is its plugins, which are very useful and work well with almost every data source. It's also easy to use, especially if you're comfortable with SQL. You can customize it to do what you need. Many other tools have started to use features similar to those introduced by StreamSets, like automated workflows that are easy to set up."

"The ability to have a good bifurcation rate and fewer mistakes is valuable."

"For me, the most valuable features in StreamSets have to be the Data Collector and Control Hub, but especially the Data Collector. That feature is very elegant and seamlessly works with numerous source systems."

"What I love the most is that StreamSets is very light. It's a containerized application. It's easy to use with Docker. If you are a large organization, it's very easy to use Kubernetes."

More StreamSets pros

Cons

"Lineage and an impact analysis or logic dependency are lacking."

"Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better."

"The documentation is inadequate and has room for improvement because the technical support does not regularly update their documentation or the knowledge base."

"The logging mechanism could be improved. If I am working on a pipeline, then create a job out of it and it is running, it will generate constant logs. So, the logging mechanism could be simplified. Now, it is a bit difficult to understand and filter the logs. It takes some time."

"One area for improvement could be the cloud storage server speed, as we have faced some latency issues here and there."

"We've seen a couple of cases where it appears to have a memory leak or a similar problem."

"One issue I observed with StreamSets is that the memory runs out quickly when processing large volumes of data. Because of this memory issue, we have to upgrade our EC2 boxes in the Amazon AWS infrastructure."

"StreamSets should provide a mechanism to be able to perform data quality assessment when the data is being moved from one source to the target."

"The software is very good overall. Areas for improvement are the error logging and the version history. I would like to see better, more detailed error logging information."

"One thing that I would like to add is the ability to manually enter data. The way the solution currently works is we don't have the option to manually change the data at any point in time. Being able to do that will allow us to do everything that we want to do with our data. Sometimes, we need to manually manipulate the data to make it more accurate in case our prior bifurcation filters are not good. If we have the option to manually enter the data or make the exact iterations on the data set, that would be a good thing."

More StreamSets cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten."

"We are running the community version right now, which can be used free of charge."

"I believe the pricing is not equitable."

"It's not so favorable for small companies."

"The pricing is affordable for any business."

"It has a CPU core-based licensing, which works for us and is quite good."

"The pricing is too fixed. It should be based on how much data you need to process. Some businesses are not so big that they process a lot of data."

"The overall cost is very flexible so it is not a burden for our organization... However, the cost should be improved. For small and mid-size organizations it might be a challenge."

"The licensing is expensive, and there are other costs involved too. I know from using the software that you have to buy new features whenever there are new updates, which I don't really like. But initially, it was very good."

More StreamSets pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,927 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rivery?

The tool's price can be a little steep for a small organization. I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rivery?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rivery?

My company has started to use the Rivery extract data from Hive. It is like a project management sort of program, and we started to use Rivery to get the data from there over into Mavenlink, so we ...

See all answers

What do you like most about StreamSets?

The best thing about StreamSets is its plugins, which are very useful and work well with almost every data source. It's also easy to use, especially if you're comfortable with SQL. You can customiz...

See all answers

What needs improvement with StreamSets?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for StreamSets?

We are using StreamSets for batch loading.

See all answers

Comparisons

dbt vs Rivery

Compared 18% of the time

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud vs Rivery

Compared 17% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Rivery

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText Migrate vs Rivery

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Glue vs Rivery

Compared 9% of the time

More Rivery Competitors

Confluent vs StreamSets

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs StreamSets

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs StreamSets

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs StreamSets

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs StreamSets

Compared 5% of the time

More StreamSets Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

December 2025

Download Rivery product report

Buyer's Guide

StreamSets

December 2025

Download StreamSets product report

Overview

Rivery is a serverless, SaaS DataOps platform that empowers companies of all sizes around the world to consolidate, orchestrate, and manage internal and external data sources with ease and efficiency.

By offering comprehensive data solutions and partnering with complementary technology providers, including Google, Snowflake, Tableau, and Looker, Rivery enables data-driven companies to build the perfect ecosystems for all their data processes.

Rivery

StreamSets is a data integration platform that enables organizations to efficiently move and process data across various systems. It offers a user-friendly interface for designing, deploying, and managing data pipelines, allowing users to easily connect to various data sources and destinations. StreamSets also provides real-time monitoring and alerting capabilities, ensuring that data is flowing smoothly and any issues are quickly addressed.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Availity, BT Group, Humana, Deluxe, GSK, RingCentral, IBM, Shell, SamTrans, State of Ohio, TalentFulfilled, TechBridge

Buyer's Guide

Rivery vs. StreamSets

January 2026

Free Report: Rivery vs. StreamSets

Find out what your peers are saying about Rivery vs. StreamSets and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,927 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Rivery vs. StreamSets report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.