Qt Squish and Qualibrate are competing products in the software testing market. Qt Squish has the upper hand in offering advanced testing capabilities, while Qualibrate excels in ease of use and quick deployment.
Features: Qt Squish boasts robust automated testing capabilities with support for multiple platforms and rich scripting options. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, essential for enterprise environments. Additionally, Squish provides powerful object identification and verification. Qualibrate offers an all-in-one approach that combines business process documentation, testing, and training, simplifying workflow for business teams. It features an intuitive user interface and efficient process recording and playback.
Room for Improvement: Qt Squish could improve by simplifying its learning curve, enhancing its user interface, and reducing initial setup complexity. It's also perceived to offer limited turnkey solutions. Qualibrate may need to enhance its advanced testing capabilities, expand its platform support, and offer more customization options to cater to larger enterprises.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qualibrate is known for rapid deployment, ease of use, and requiring minimal setup, making it accessible for teams with limited IT support. It provides solid customer service with comprehensive support packages. Qt Squish allows for a more customizable deployment but may present a steeper learning curve. Its customer service is well-regarded, serving as a technical resource.
Pricing and ROI: Qt Squish involves a higher initial investment but offers strong ROI for organizations in need of advanced testing solutions, with pricing justified by its capabilities. In contrast, Qualibrate features a more attractive pricing model for small to mid-sized businesses, with a focus on fast turnaround and quicker ROI, especially where rapid process adaptability is essential.
For the part that has been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
With one license, just one user or one test scenario can be run at a time.
If you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java.
For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
